Grzegorz_
28 Feb 2016
News / 2016, the year of change in Poland? [70]
It should be only for 2nd and 3rd child, to cut off Gypsies and other underclass "producers of children". It's not a welfare program but an investment program, to turn current 2+1 model into 2+2 and avoid importing millions of savages in the future, who (next to other... issues) would become a huge burden on the budget. The thing with taxes is that most of young families make so little that even 0 PIT would not help enough. The "rich" ? Perhaps top 10% shouldn't get it but on the other hand they contribute more than enough in taxes, so getting back a bit of it is a non-issue. Making it income based would generate additional administrative costs and opportunities for abuse.
Too bad PO's 500 also for the first child wasn't accepted, right?
It should be only for 2nd and 3rd child, to cut off Gypsies and other underclass "producers of children". It's not a welfare program but an investment program, to turn current 2+1 model into 2+2 and avoid importing millions of savages in the future, who (next to other... issues) would become a huge burden on the budget. The thing with taxes is that most of young families make so little that even 0 PIT would not help enough. The "rich" ? Perhaps top 10% shouldn't get it but on the other hand they contribute more than enough in taxes, so getting back a bit of it is a non-issue. Making it income based would generate additional administrative costs and opportunities for abuse.