pawian
9 Feb 2020
News / Dodgy PRL-holdover judiciary finally reformed [420]
No , it isn`t in accordance with the Constitution which states: Judges are irremovable. Paragraph 180, my dear gumi.
arslege.pl/zasada-nieusuwalnosci-sedziego/k15/a5415/
HA!
Besides, was the EU wrong when they pointed to the illegality of that move? They also have their paragraphs and Poland is obliged to stick to them. Or you want Poland out of the EU? Be sincere now....... :))
by lowering the retirement age of the judges appointed to the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) and by applying that measure to the judges in post appointed to that court before 3 April 2018 and, secondly, by granting the President of the Republic the discretion to extend the period of judicial activity of judges of that court beyond the newly fixed retirement age, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the combined provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ('the Charter').
curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=215341&doclang=EN
hahaha twisting and playing stupid, again. That`s how a discussion with a rightwinger look like. :):)
Dwa wyroki Trybunału Konstytucyjnego - wykazały, że zgodnym z Konstytucją RP jest wyznaczanie przez parlament wieku przejścia w stan spoczynku sędziów
No , it isn`t in accordance with the Constitution which states: Judges are irremovable. Paragraph 180, my dear gumi.
arslege.pl/zasada-nieusuwalnosci-sedziego/k15/a5415/
HA!
Besides, was the EU wrong when they pointed to the illegality of that move? They also have their paragraphs and Poland is obliged to stick to them. Or you want Poland out of the EU? Be sincere now....... :))
by lowering the retirement age of the judges appointed to the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) and by applying that measure to the judges in post appointed to that court before 3 April 2018 and, secondly, by granting the President of the Republic the discretion to extend the period of judicial activity of judges of that court beyond the newly fixed retirement age, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the combined provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ('the Charter').
curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=215341&doclang=EN
I said it's probably easy to name a couple of them - but so far you haven't given any
hahaha twisting and playing stupid, again. That`s how a discussion with a rightwinger look like. :):)