income from foreign sources
What a skewed comparison! You really are clutching at straws. (I prefer the Polish,,sih version: a drowning man clutching at a razor!). According to oyu a casher at Biedronka can be comapred to a polticla party on the take. A political party influences legislation, the workings of government and the life of the nation and as such should not be on the payroll of foreign sponsors. That has nothing to do with individuals who have little if any influence on the common weal.
Another aspect of this whole row which has hardly been mentioend is PO's desperate bid to continue its TK monopoly. Although pluralism is the cornerstone of democratic governance, PO had 14 appointees on the 15-man TK and their hasty appointment of 5 new ones was intended to perpetuate that imbalance. When the only party in post-PRL Poland ever to democratically win an election outright tried to improve the compositon, PO launched yet another all-out battle in the ridiculous, wasteful and destabilising time-, energy- and cost-consuming Polish-Polish war.
That seems to be a pattern. When PO lost in 2005 they also went into shock and rebounded with furious, no-holds-barred attacks on the democratically elected government. It appears the PO views democracy as comrpising only one of two options: either they win or throw a destructive, destabilising tantrum!