irishlodz
11 May 2010
History / Thinking of changing Wikipedia's Holocaust article to include genocide of Poles. [78]
I don't accept it and nor has anyone I've spoken to. I lived in the US for a while and know the fear people live in of insulting Jewish sensitivities on the matter.
The dishonesty toward history is that the word has been hijacked. It has been in use since long before WW2.
Someone had a different opinion to you and you suggest they drown themselves in a toilet! Why do you bother coming on a forum?
Because the Holocaust is generally accepted as the Jewish genocide.
Which is the correct description. If you try to change it, you are dishonest towards history.
Which is the correct description. If you try to change it, you are dishonest towards history.
I don't accept it and nor has anyone I've spoken to. I lived in the US for a while and know the fear people live in of insulting Jewish sensitivities on the matter.
The dishonesty toward history is that the word has been hijacked. It has been in use since long before WW2.
Someone had a different opinion to you and you suggest they drown themselves in a toilet! Why do you bother coming on a forum?