The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by Arien  

Joined: 20 Oct 2008 / Male ♂
Last Post: 1 May 2010
Threads: Total: 3 / Live: 2 / Archived: 1
Posts: Total: 719 / Live: 439 / Archived: 280

Displayed posts: 441 / page 1 of 15
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Arien   
1 May 2010
News / Poland could emerge as new European and world power. If? [116]

Drac90, do you really want to talk about freedom to me, when I meet Polish youths everyday, who say they're really happy to be here for a while, because back in Poland someone's always talking fire and sin, or preaching about the rules when they don't conform to their norms? Yes, to you it may seem like some people are free to believe in what they want, but let me tell you that most of these people who really do, only socialize with the other scapegoats who have the courage to be themselves, because the rest will stigmatize them socially. (Conformity.) I don't hate these people who stigmatize us out of peer pressure, because deep down, I know they would like to be free. I've had to deal with this my whole youth, but I'm happy to tell you they're rapidly turning into a small minority here. There's a choice, follow your own heart, and hope others will follow their own heart aswell, or be a sheep and follow the shepherd, and live in fear. (Free to believe my ass!) I'd feel sorry for any person who has or had to live like I had to live though! But the good news is that you will always find a few people who think like you, and those people will also find more people who think like you. Untill one day, you'll see that people like you became the majority. (Which will happen eventually, because it's becoming more and more obvious who's lying.)

Anyway, let's give this discussion a rest for now, because I think Crow wanted to discuss the possibility of Poland becoming a new world power. (Honestly I can't see it happening anytime soon though!)
Arien   
1 May 2010
News / Poland could emerge as new European and world power. If? [116]

Drac90, I'm afraid the money goes straight to the Vatican. You don't have to provide those links for me, because as I've already stated previously, I'm not denying the fact that a few Priests and Nuns actually did something for their own country. But that doesn't change the fact that the Roman Catholic Church as a whole has always supported tyrants when it was beneficial for them. (Just read your history books!) I think you need to understand I'm not against individuals here, but that I see the institution as a whole as morally corrupt. (Okay?)
Arien   
1 May 2010
News / Poland could emerge as new European and world power. If? [116]

Drac90, yes, but ofcourse that doesn't change the fact that the Polish Roman Catholic Church supports the Vatican financially. Now think about that for a second before you actually defend an institute which obviously isn't acting in your best interest. Like it or not, you're defending the Vatican when you're defending their Churches. (It's tricky business, I know!) Dtaylor, maybe you're right about that, but then again a few disappointments in life will not stop me from enjoying the ride!
Arien   
30 Apr 2010
News / Poland could emerge as new European and world power. If? [116]

Drac90, for your information, local priests support the Vatican. (Or have they stopped calling themselves Roman Catholics all of a sudden?) Drac90, okay. Now you're being objective. I'm not denying the fact that a few priests and nuns actually did something for their own country, but it's not the Roman Catholic Church as a whole. (Even your Catholic Church.) It's not the Pope who saved Poland on his own, and that's what I meant.
Arien   
30 Apr 2010
News / Poland could emerge as new European and world power. If? [116]

Drac90, relax, I obviously don't like the Vatican, and for good reasons, but that doesn't mean I'm going to kill you because you disagree with me. You have your opinion, I have mine, and I can live with that. Just keep in mind that Lech Wałęsa and many other Polish people have done a lot when they began with Solidarność. (Dtaylor, yup, I know one Polish girl who has this natural talent, among other natural talents!)
Arien   
30 Apr 2010
News / Poland could emerge as new European and world power. If? [116]

Drac90, the Vatican fought off the Germans? Don't make me laugh! If you want to put your trust in people who have smuggled Nazi's to Argentina, then be my guest. Ofcourse you can give credits to Karol Józef Wojtyła for speaking to politicians, but don't forget Lech Wałęsa has done a lot for Poland when the Vatican wasn't there, and don't forget how other countries pressured the Soviet Union either. My point is that the Vatican itself will kneel to tyrants whenever it benefits them. History doesn't lie.
Arien   
30 Apr 2010
News / Poland could emerge as new European and world power. If? [116]

Crow, you should dump the Vatican. They've betrayed Slavic people in the second world war, and they will betray people again if they feel it's necessary. Just look at our history, and look at the facts. We don't really need these Nazi-supporting child-molesters to tell us what to do anymore, and if the people in the Balkans are smart, they would simply agree with us. You can't trust the Vatican. Ever. They only want power and influence, and they don't care about the people. Remember that.
Arien   
30 Apr 2010
History / Should visitors to Auschwitz pay an entrance fee? [82]

No, visitors to Auschwitz should never pay an entrance fee. (Out of respect for all the victims.) It's basically a graveyard, so I don't think you should charge people to see it. Besides, I believe education should be free for all. Maybe we should all consider a collective EU fund for memorial sites like Auschwitz?
Arien   
30 Apr 2010
Food / Poles prefer pizza & kebab? [64]

Well, Pizza and Kebab can be tasty sometimes, so I can't say I blame them.
Arien   
29 Apr 2010
News / Nuclear Power in Poland? Yes, please! Absolutely nobody disagrees! [73]

Voltage has nothing to do with energy consumption.

It has everything to do with frequency, energy transport and distance, and therefore, it has everything to do with energy consumption.

Lower voltage would mean higher amps,

Not necessarily, no. (Are you an Electrician, or did you just Google something?) Because if you are, I'm willing to explain this in great detail to you, but I'm afraid it won't make much sense to you or anyone else here if you aren't.

If you know how to make ICs use less juice, please let me know. I'll split the money with you.

It's just that it's never been done before but theoretically there are many options. (Ever thought about different types of conductors? Different circumstances? Distance? Cooling?) We all know that it's warmth which increases resistance, - ofcourse it also depends on what type of conductor - and that the warmth is caused by a higher frequency. (Hint!)

The problem with hydro is that if you build small, the cost is extremely high.

The actual size would depend on the pressure you intend to design it for.

Plus you need a huge swath of land to destroy in order to build a reservoir.

Who said anything about land? Ever seen the Delta Works in Holland?

Hypothetical situation. I'm an energy company. I need an additional 10000MW of base load in the next 10 years. How would you do it?

10 Giga Watt? Okay. (I'm just going to assume I have a lot of money here!) I would create a huge U-shaped artificial canal/pipe near the coast line, which would go through the dunes at one point, and exit through the dunes at the other point. (We're living 9 meter below sea level remember?) I would build 10 turbines in this canal/pipe, whatever! The pressure will be enormous, and these turbines will rotate much faster than the larger ones they're currently planting near the coast lines. You'll have your 10 Giga Watt (Probably 20!) within 4-5 years.
Arien   
29 Apr 2010
News / Nuclear Power in Poland? Yes, please! Absolutely nobody disagrees! [73]

Sure, why aren't they being built like mad?

Because of certain lobbyists, politicians and certain people *cough* who keep going on about nuclear power as if it's the only option we have.

Beautiful, 100% in, 70% out, on a good day. Plus of course the increased cost per kwh to the home.

True, but this is ofcourse a back up, and if you combine the use of multiple alternatives, you probably won't need to store energy at all. (Just trying to make a point to the people who were talking about power outages!)

Wow, don't know where to start with that. In Europe, all nuclear plants have a cleanup fund that has to be funded before construction can begin.

True, but have you looked at these funds? These funds are nowhere near sufficient to clean up the mess. Have you looked at the so-called insurances for nuclear power plants? No insurance company wants to insure these guys! Same story, they have an insurance policy, backed by the government and business ofcourse, but again these funds are nowhere near sufficient to cover in case of a worst-case scenario. (I guess they're keeping their fingers crossed nothing will happen?)

It's factored in to the pricing. The coal market is fairly volatile, and it's getting much more expensive year on year to burn coal.

I'm aware of that, and to me that's good news!

Not following you here. Wouldn't that be a bit dangerous?

What's dangerous about adjusting electronic equipment, so that it can work on a lower Voltage? We could adjust most of our electronic equipment so that this would use up less Amps and Watts aswell. We could even install two seperate powergrids in a house. (One for low power.) Oh, and you could also choose to put solar panels in parellel, instead of in serial, which will provide a higher voltage. (I'm sure Electricians will understand my Dutch?)

Nuclear isn't the long term end all answer. But we need energy right now, and gas and coal are quickly becoming unacceptable.

Europeans could build dams too if they really wanted it. The Itaipu dam for example, took 11 years to complete. If we would build smaller ones, and with today's construction methods, we might be looking at 5 or 6 years? Ambitious, I know, but the results don't lie. One dam could easily compete with 8 to 10 reactors. 8 to 10 reactors will cost billions, and a dam will cost billions aswell, but a dam will be cleaner, safer, reliable, produces no waste, will not damage the environment, needs no delving, or the transport of materials and resources and will have a lifespan of atleast a few hundred years if built well. So yeah, I'm all for water, because it's without question, the most powerful solution.

Who's afraid of water?
Arien   
29 Apr 2010
News / Nuclear Power in Poland? Yes, please! Absolutely nobody disagrees! [73]

1 reactor can produce way more power then a number of huge dams.. this isn't even comparable..

Kendal Power Station, the world's largest coal-fired power plant: 4.116 Giga Watt.
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Reactor, the world's largest nuclear power plant: 8.21 Giga Watt. (7 reactors.)

Hoover Dam: 4 Giga Watt.
Itaipu Dam: 12.6 Giga Watt.

Please?

But you know what? Let's forget about this whole discussion about needing more energy for a second. Let's all pretend we're Arien for a second, and let's all pretend we've been paying some attention to our surroundings, because I'm going to say something clever. (Yes, I'm serious.)

We can lower our daily energy consumption by making simple adjustments to electronics and electrical devices.

For example, I'm sitting behind my computer. My computer doesn't really need 230 V to work properly. It needs 12 V to be exact. I've just made coffee, and my coffee machine doesn't really need 230 V either! (I'm willing to bet it needs 12 V aswell!) Lightbulbs? Televisions? They don't need 230 V either! (Yup, 12 V will suffice!)

For your information, most lightbulbs work perfectly on 12 V, but the power grid in our houses still provide us with 230 V. (How the heck are we trying to be efficient here?!)

If we were to lower the Voltages, we would need less crazy ways to run all of our households. And Cardno, take it from an Electrician, we could all run a household on 20 solar panels if we really wanted to. (Easily!) I'm just going to be so bold and brave to say that we could probably lower our daily energy consumption by 30% (Maybe even 40 to 50% with alternatives!) if we made a few simple adjustments to electronics and electrical devices, so that they'll actually work on 12 V without converting, instead of on 230 V, which is obviously a waste of energy.

I don't mind if you disagree with me, but atleast give me some arguments and facts, instead of going on like nuclear energy is our saviour all of a sudden. It really isn't! It's just another money making scheme for a select few.

A few things to keep in mind; The average nuclear power plant will cost you 3.2 Billion Dollars to build. (75% of what it will actually contribute. With gas and coal this is 25%.) Keep in mind that it's subsidized, because in reality, nuclear energy is 15% more expensive than coal. (According to the IEA!) Nobody is picking up the bills when it comes to actually storing all that radio-active waste. Nobody is picking up the bills when it comes to undoing the environmental damage while they're delving for raw materials. (And also leaving radio-active material exposed to the elements.) Oh, and keep in mind that we don't really need all of this because there are plenty of realistic alternatives.
Arien   
29 Apr 2010
News / Nuclear Power in Poland? Yes, please! Absolutely nobody disagrees! [73]

Wind and solar can't provide base power.

No? Have you seen the E-126 produced by Enercon? 7 Mega Watt. If you build 143 of these windmills you'll have 1 Giga Watt. Build 2288 of these windmills and you'll have 16 Giga Watt. I don't think I have to tell you that's 16 times as much as the average nuclear reactor? You'll need to build 16 nuclear reactors (And factories.) to match that. Oh, and base power? Ever heard about energy storage?

Oh, and about solar power, solar power has the potential to provide over 1000 times the total energy consumption. (Worldwide.) Everyone is always talking about PV cells, but you should really look into CSP for a change, which basically means Concentrated Solar Power, which generates thermal energy. (Same principle as with coal, only 100% clean.)

Alright, I gave you an argument. Now where's yours?

Take it from a physicist, nuclear power is the way forward.

Is it? What are you going to do with all that nuclear waste? (It can stay radioactive for over 3000 years you know!) How are you going to deny that alternative sources, if you combine them, together have much and much more potential than nuclear energy will ever have? (Without waste, without risks!) Because you can talk for as long as you want, nuclear energy is not without risks. (Its effectivity isn't all that either if you look at what the whole process will cost you.)

Another thing which didn't get a mention here: Tidal energy. (Which will completely dwarf any of the above alternatives!)

Tidal Energy

That should give you an idea about the principle?

SeaGen, was installed by Marine Current Turbines in Strangford Lough in Northern Ireland in April 2008. The turbine began to generate at full power of just over 1.2 MW in December 2008 and is reported to have fed 150 kW into the grid for the first time on 17 July 2008, and has now contributed more than a Giga Watt/hour to consumers in Northern Ireland.

1 turbine. 1 Giga Watt/hour. Okay?

I still haven't heard any arguments that made sense.
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
Love / Are Polish men romantic and caring or... "plain"? [85]

tjhey are known to have two women and most want two women ones not enogh.

Yeah, but then again most girls I've seen going around town seem to like the ''men'' who have (Or have had.) two women, or three women, or five! (Or twenty!) because all those guys who didn't (Or don't!) can't be nice to be with, right?

Two words: Women. Logic.

Yes, very mad!
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
News / Nuclear Power in Poland? Yes, please! Absolutely nobody disagrees! [73]

Yea, hydro is awesome, but also very expensive.

Less expensive than all the nuclear reactors, factories and personel you're going to need to achieve the same results. (Energy wise.)

Or Thorium. Anyway, for the uranium argument, there is plenty. Little thing called reprocessing helps too...

You'll need to repeat the whole splitting process again, which means you're going to create even more nuclear waste than you did before. (Ever thought about that?) There are four billion kilos of natural Uranium which we could delve if we wanted to. (Unless technological miracles happen, the rest would be impossible to reach!) There are two types of variants. Only U 235 would be suitable material. With our current energy usage, this means that we're talking about sixty to eighty years of supply. (But ofcourse we're going to use more energy as the population is still growing.)

Again, no answer for base load. Would you suggest replacing all base load in a country the size of Germany with hydro? It's no feasible for the long term. Coal, nuclear, or gas, take your pick.

No? I think I've already answered your question, because it's going to cost you much more to build nuclear reactors and factories to achieve the same results. (And it's going to cost you even more to actually delve, transport, reprocess or even create Uranium.) How often does a nuclear reactor needs maintenance? (Every month?) What is the lifespan of a nuclear reactor? (70 years?) Thorium? How much of this material do you think you'll need? That's even worse than Uranium if we're going to talk about effectivity!

Windmills, water-turbines or solar panels. Take your pick. (Actually, take them all at the same time!) No waste, no transport, a less work-intensive process, a hundred percent effectiveness, no risks. More jobs, an endless supply of energy resources and more money in your pockets.

Give me a real argument please.
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
News / Nuclear Power in Poland? Yes, please! Absolutely nobody disagrees! [73]

Which is great when you've got sunlight and wind, not too great for base load.

Check out the Hoover Dam please.

Yawn, breeder reactors?

Oh really? Well, answer this question then; How much time, money, effort and energy will it cost to actually create Uranium? And even with breeder reactors, you'll still need a certain amount of raw, natural Uranium! (U 235.)

Green technology looks more promising and you know it.
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
News / Nuclear Power in Poland? Yes, please! Absolutely nobody disagrees! [73]

How much Uranium can be found worldwide? Barely enough for sixty to eighty years of energy production.

Even when they know where they can delve Uranium, it's still going to be impossible to actually reach some of these deposits. It takes eight years to build a fully functional, and fully productive nuclear reactor, and will cost a lot of money. In those wasted eight years, and for the same amount of money, you could've built many more water-turbines, solar panels and windmills, which all have an 100% effectiveness, without needing any other additional resources than the materials needed to produce them.

How much time, effort and energy does it cost to enrich Uranium? Much and much more than a water-turbine, a solar panel or a windmill, because these have an infinite supply of free energy, which makes them 100% effective.

Is coal sexy? No, it's not sexy. People who are afraid to lose their jobs shouldn't have to worry about that, if the government together with business people co-operate to make a smooth transition happen. People should simply be offered an education, so they can simply switch jobs from mine workers to electricians, engineers or become a part of the technical maintenance teams you will need to keep everything working. More jobs, more production, more money, and an infinite amount of cheap and clean energy for an infinite amount of time aswell.

Bring it on!
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
Love / I'm from Argentina, but I want to meet this Polish Girl.. [20]

Lesson: don't trust people on the internet.

True, you should always be careful, but he's talking about a girl who showed him her parents while they were talking to eachother on the webcam, which means she already informed her family of the possibility of a foreign boyfriend, which means she could be serious about him.

Just saying!
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
Love / I'm from Argentina, but I want to meet this Polish Girl.. [20]

Well, first things first? Go ahead and see what happens when you meet her!

In the meanwhile, you should already do some research for yourself to see if she'll able to obtain a Visa. (It might depend on what you earn aswell?) For example; What kind of qualifications does she have? What kind of courses could she do in Argentina to learn the language, or courses to improve her chances of finding a job?

If everything works out between you two on your first meeting, you should keep in touch and see about a second time, and if she really thinks she wants to move to Argentina for you, then atleast make sure you have some answers for her.

You can't expect people to throw themselves into the deep. You should really ask yourself if you would mind to live in Poland, because family seems to be really important to some Polish girls, and you never know if she might get homesick after a while. (Hey, such things happen!) Don't let me discourage you or anything, just make sure you're really certain about all of this. It'll be better for yourself, and for the girl aswell if you're prepared for anything.

Just stay positive, and see what happens when you meet her!
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
Love / I'm from Argentina, but I want to meet this Polish Girl.. [20]

I'm just saying you shouldn't expect too much untill you can say for certain that you two really like eachother after you've met a few times, and before any of that happens, you shouldn't invest or even risk everything for someone who might not turn out to be the one for you. Just ask yourself a few questions. Do you want to live in Poland? Will you be able to obtain a Visa? Will you be able to find a job in Poland? Are you learning Polish already?

If you can answer those questions with a yes, then you should meet her a couple of times when you have the money, and see how it goes. If you're not certain about your answers however, then you might aswell find a girl closer to home. I'm not going to tell you what you should do though, because she could be the love of your life.

Good luck!
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
Love / English Men vs Polish Men [207]

In all honesty I dont think Polish men are as popular with English women as Polish women are with British men.

That's pretty weird, because from what I'm reading here British men don't always seem to be popular with British women either?

Just wondering!
Arien   
28 Apr 2010
Love / I'm from Argentina, but I want to meet this Polish Girl.. [20]

I think there are many girls who seem nice on the internet, and a few really might be nice if you get to know them, but I think it's much better to meet someone in real life. There's always something you don't really know about eachother..

Sorry if that's not what you wanted to hear!