Atch
10 Mar 2024
Life / Womans day in Poland? [242]
And I'm delighted. I myself would have voted No to both proposed changes in the Referendums. People voted 'no' for an assortment of reasons. A lot of people, including myself, felt that the replacement clauses were far too vague in their wording and as Irish people have a lot of experience in voting in referendums we won't vote yes for something we're not sure about.
However, more importantly I would also have voted No because I agree with the present wording:
1. In particular, the State recognises that by her life within the home, woman gives
to the State a support without which the common good cannot be achieved.
I absolutely agree with this point. Women do invaluable work within the home. The constitution was written in 1932 and nowadays though most women are working outside the home too, they continue to be the central figure in the home. I like seeing that respected and acknowledged.
2. The State shall, therefore, endeavour to ensure that mothers shall not be obliged
by economic necessity to engage in labour to the neglect of their duties in the
home.
Point 2 may seem outdated by modern standards but it is still a model to which we should aspire. I would like to see the wording altered slightly to reflect the times we live in but the bottom line is that women should be given all the supports needed to make it possible for them to remain at home with their children if they wish to do so, especially in the crucial early years. It would be nice to see the government actually act on the promise made in the Constitution instead of simply paying lip-service to the idea.
They did and the results were clear!
Ireland Rejects Constitution Changes, Keeping 'Women in the Home' Language
Ireland Rejects Constitution Changes, Keeping 'Women in the Home' Language
And I'm delighted. I myself would have voted No to both proposed changes in the Referendums. People voted 'no' for an assortment of reasons. A lot of people, including myself, felt that the replacement clauses were far too vague in their wording and as Irish people have a lot of experience in voting in referendums we won't vote yes for something we're not sure about.
However, more importantly I would also have voted No because I agree with the present wording:
1. In particular, the State recognises that by her life within the home, woman gives
to the State a support without which the common good cannot be achieved.
I absolutely agree with this point. Women do invaluable work within the home. The constitution was written in 1932 and nowadays though most women are working outside the home too, they continue to be the central figure in the home. I like seeing that respected and acknowledged.
2. The State shall, therefore, endeavour to ensure that mothers shall not be obliged
by economic necessity to engage in labour to the neglect of their duties in the
home.
Point 2 may seem outdated by modern standards but it is still a model to which we should aspire. I would like to see the wording altered slightly to reflect the times we live in but the bottom line is that women should be given all the supports needed to make it possible for them to remain at home with their children if they wish to do so, especially in the crucial early years. It would be nice to see the government actually act on the promise made in the Constitution instead of simply paying lip-service to the idea.

