delphiandomine
17 Jan 2012
Real Estate / Residential real estate values go down in Poland [455]
But it is where the property is/was purchased - that's more or less a direct transfer.
(don't get me started on the insanity of someone with a zameldowanie there claiming rights to the property)
There's sentimentality in that it was a very popular move to allow people to buy their flats for peanuts - not least because many of the flats were occupied by ex-Party (or ex-Party institution workers). A fair system would have redistributed the flats before allowing people to buy them.
The fair price would have been the market value at the time of purchase - be it 2011 or 1991.
As for the Government taking stuff - well, there are processes to deal with that. It's a separate issue, as I'm mainly talking about new builds (post 1945).
Social housing should be for those in need (and who are deserving, no drunks/wasters) - if someone needs a municipal flat, then they should live in a flat suitable for their needs. Don't you see the insanity of poor families living in tiny flats while Babcia lives alone in a huge flat? Both are owned by the State - and they should switch. Again - you can't allow sentimentality to override logic.
it;s by no means a direct money transfer - it's the use of the premises that's inherited and not any kind of ownership
But it is where the property is/was purchased - that's more or less a direct transfer.
(don't get me started on the insanity of someone with a zameldowanie there claiming rights to the property)
What are you talking about: sentimentality? That's what you think about inheritance?
There's sentimentality in that it was a very popular move to allow people to buy their flats for peanuts - not least because many of the flats were occupied by ex-Party (or ex-Party institution workers). A fair system would have redistributed the flats before allowing people to buy them.
Anyway, maybe their families had the money/holdings that the government took? How far do you go back the make sure the fair price have been paid?
The fair price would have been the market value at the time of purchase - be it 2011 or 1991.
As for the Government taking stuff - well, there are processes to deal with that. It's a separate issue, as I'm mainly talking about new builds (post 1945).
Also, who decides when the flat is too big? And how many people should live in it? That sounds like the good old communist times.
Social housing should be for those in need (and who are deserving, no drunks/wasters) - if someone needs a municipal flat, then they should live in a flat suitable for their needs. Don't you see the insanity of poor families living in tiny flats while Babcia lives alone in a huge flat? Both are owned by the State - and they should switch. Again - you can't allow sentimentality to override logic.