Your arguments are what they teach kids in western schools. As I quoted in an early post, "The communism is not hard to understand", but it's hard to explain why it did not work, coz the whole world, together with all of us, indirectly supporting the exploitation of the poorer, are working against it!
1. Communism hasn't really worked anywhere, so... I guess that's one answer.
Depends what you demand. Do you demand a decent living for the majority or an extravagant living for few while the majority, the old, poor, live in slums, as it is nowadays with the world. We should not put the Soviet implemantation of communism as the communism. And everytime soem country tried to go its way with communism, the west with it's money interfered.
It was imposed by the Soviets/Russians. Sure, there were Communists in Poland before Poland was incorporated under Soviet influence, but they weren't the ones in control. I wonder if things would have been different had the Soviets backed off, and let Communism take root in Poland on its own. (Obviously, that wasn't the plan.) And we all know how the Polish feel about taking orders from everybody else:)
What was made wrong in Poland by the communists was repreated by the allies in Vietnam. Poland as well as Vietnam underwent a long period of occupation so Poland as well as Vietnam fought in their big wars to get independance primarly. The Vietkong were nationalists first, they didn't want foreign troups fighting their war. They wanted them all out, the French, the US. The Polish would maybe have rather embraced communism were the russians not the worst during the partation of Poland, were there not Trotsky who tried in the twenties to bring communism to Europe over "the dead body of Poland".
So yes partly that was the reason why Poles did oppose communism out of frowardness.
The soviet leaders were not unquestionable. But things done wrong, and there were many, were part of a bigger picture. The soviets planned for a world revolution. This plan demanded in their eyes a harsh treatment of some subjects and an involvement in weaponrace with the west, which they ultimatevly lost due to unability to deliver the additionary consumegoods the public demanded. And besides the real hardcore army-guys, the nomenclatura of the sovietunion was decadent. The weapons they produced were supportior.
3. The Church. Obviously Church leaders were against Communism (well, some played both sides, but we all know about that), and in Poland that means a lot.
This had partly historic reasons, as the church was regarded part of a burgeouise system to ease the demands of the proletariate. Therethrough the church grew into the role of supporting exploitation systems. Though in Poland the church had a positive role in my eyes, in opposite to say Franco Spain, during the socialistic times, as it eased the peoples pain done by a regime which did not understand the peoples resistance. Or maybe better put, understand it, but due to the bigger goal (World Revolution) chose to overlook it and play it down.
4. Poland's level of industrialization was not up to the standards of say... Czechoslovakia, which did better under Communism. Really, if you look at the former Communist countries, the ones that did the best (comparatively) were the most industrialized. Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, the Baltic Republics of the Soviet Union (which weren't all that industrialized, but compared to other Republics, they were). The countries that did the worst were the more agrarian ones: Poland, Romania, Albania, etc.
Its rather the level of infrastructure you are refering to. Poland had some industrial sectors which were regarding pure output on the top of the world.
Everytime you buy a new Nokia-handset, produced in Romania, due to lower wages there, you support the system. You may say, well the Romanians at Nokia get paid quite well for Romanian measures. But ask yourself, why is it cheaper to live in Romania? And secondly, what is the conclusion of the Nokia-worker buying from his hardearned money a Metabo-powerdrill made in Germany, which will allow the German Metabo-worker to buy a handset for each of his family?
answer:
It's the exploitation of workpower. An hour lifetime given by a Romanian is less worth than one given by a German. And lets not start with Peruans, Chinese, Indians ....