Harry
27 Apr 2016 #1741
It clearly states that a law whose constitutionality is about to be evaluated enjoys the presumption of constituionality.
Why do you insist on telling this lie so many times? Do you think that if you repeat it enough times it will stop being a lie? I keep telling you: laws are not presumed to be constitutional until ruled otherwise. If your lie was true, a government could simply pass a law saying that only women can be Constitutional Court judges and then refuse to accept the verdict of the Constitutional Court ruling that law unconstitutional because an insufficient number of legally approved judges voted on it. Such tactics might work in the banana republics of your own continent (most of which are funded by your own government), but here in Europe we do things differently: it's all about the rule of law, not the rule of the Party.
the TK acted in violation of the bindign amended law.
No, it did not, as is clear to everybody not blinded by their love of PIS.