POKO and LGBT lobby is trying to sexualize children in Poland. Now they aim for adoption

They've adopted the laws protecting kids from an aggressive LGBT propaganda? Good news then


No. It's a long term thinking about a well-being of the whole Polish society

Always interesting how creative homophobes get when they try to rephrase perfectly normal endeavours. Teaching children that LBGT is perfectly natural and nothing to be either ashamed of, or discriminate against is "agressive LBGT propaganda" instead of a) common sense and b) based on scientific research. But some people just want to feel powerful by discriminating against people who were born with different sexual orientations to give some meaning to their empty lifes. It is so pathetic.

Not really. This is all about political orders over all, as witnessed by the fact that most places passing these resolutions are very poor by Polish standards. I'd be quite irritated if my local representatives were wasting time and money on nonsense like this.

I could rip your post apart with both of my hands tied behind my back but I know I would be wasting my time since the weasels leftists like you never respond on points - only with the bs adjectives.

If its perfectly natural then how come 2 homos can't create a baby? Why did God punish them at Sodom and Gomorrah?


You might get serious hurt by one of these kids parents if you start brainwashing them with this rubbish.

Because these bio parasites live off the host - you, me, and the rest of the normal humans who can.

You post is a good example of the ideological bias.
Even your language is revolutionary. If I were to use your vocabulary I would say that you using a language of hate and discrimination against those who disagree with your ideology.

In other words it is an aggression and attacks where you are trying to belittle those who disagree with your ideology.


I agree, it is a very weak and inadequate response to demands of the people.

Well, firstly there are a lot of people who don't believe in god, so that is hardly an argument. You might as well ask why Christians are sinners and will go to hell because they do not believe in Allah. Secondly, the god of the old testament is hardly a moral authority by modern standards. Remember how he tortured his most loyal servant just to make a point? Thirdly, if you actually knew this part of the bible, you'd would that homosexuality was actually the least of the sins commited in those cities.


Not like you ever made one that doesn't boil down to our insecurities and which are based on empty hatred.


Homosexuality is common occurence in nature, with many different species engaging into. Research indicates that people are born with those sexual orientations, with no way to change it. And since there is no harm in two consenting people engaging in sexual preferences of their choice, there is also no logical reason to discriminate against it. Why would anyone divulge hatred against a man who likes to date other men? As a man myself, it is not my concern, and if anything that makes one fewer competitor for the ladies.


Anyone who resorts to violence because they can not accept human nature is unfit to be a parent at all. And again, those stupid propaganda "phrases". People are in fact brainwashed to hate on LBGTQ, because there is no logical reason to do so in the first place.


I would take it more serious if they offered in terms in arguments than hypocrisy, superstition and empty hatred.

Name me one mammal that can reproduce within it own sex? You cant, because its actually against the Laws of Nature as well.


Its the Libs pushing this deviant behavior upon our society and now our children. Like simulated sex acts during public parades and guys kissing on TV, exposing innocent children to this sickness with out their parents consent. Gays are a small population in society, yet they want to force their beliefs upon everyone.

So is child abuse. So is wife abuse. So is alcoholism, gambling and drug addiction. So is death by venomous snakes and poisonous mushrooms.

I am not talking about reproduction. There are lots of other species who engage in homosexual behaviour. Since most sexual intercourse is nowadays not done with reproduction in mind, this is hardly an argument. Science has shown that people are born with their sexual orientation and can not change. Trying to convince homosexuals that there sexuality is wrong is an act of useless cruelty.


It is more like you forcing your belief on others, namely that homosexuality is "deviant" when there is no rational argument for it. Poland will only advance as a society when it does not base its' values on superstition and hatred. But to Polands' credit, it is moving into the right direction.

@ Rich Mazur


Q.E.D.

This thread is about sexual departures from the normal, not "our insecurities" or "hatred".

I am against child molestations. Does it meant I feel insecure posting about molesters? BTW, don't even bother with that bs that molesting kids is a crime. That's a separate issue.

It is the sexaul attraction to children that is abnormal and revolting just as the attraction to another man's rectum - abnormal, revolting, and without biological purpose.

If you know what that bio purpose of sticking a dick into another guy's rear end is, please, don't keep it a secret.

You are such an innocent snowflake in one way. I don't know if anyone has bothered to give you the "talk" but there are ways of sexual intercourse in which hetero couples engage in and which are not intended for reproduction (nevermind that most couples dont have sex with the aim of producing children and may even take active measures to prevent). And just because you dont like anal doesnt mean other hetero couples dont either.


Sure, but this has nothing to do with homosexuality. Unless you want to imply that you as a hetero are potential molester of girls.


But this is what your arguments ultimately feed fronm . Insecurities are the most benevolent interpretation mind you. You hate them, possibly for reasons you dont want to admit to yourself, and try to justify it with arguments that fall apart at the first glance. Because ultimately they are just window dressings for you empty hatred.

And yet, when they finally decide to have children they are able to do so. Homosexuals, on the other hand...

That does not make my fact-based arguments invalid.


What I hate or love is my business and you have no business crawling into my head. The only thing on the table for discussion is that homos are parasites on the hetero host and, therefore, biologically useless. That's it. How I feel is irrelevant.

LGBT is an ideological movement. It doesn't focus on improving lives of homosexuals' but uses them for its won ideological means. In the same way communist used and use so called workers or workers rights.

You are giving these parasites more credit than they deserve.

It's all about money and, as a sideline, stifling the critics by demanding to be classified as a protected minority. Hence, the references to the black civil right movement. The comparison which the blacks resent deeply.

The money part is simple: once "married", they qualify for the tax breaks the heteros get to help them raise kids.

The other big bucks are in being treated when they get AIDS - a 100% preventable disease.

It's really that simple.

Are also nowadays able to have children if they so desire, thanks to medicine. Of course that is easier for lesbian couples, but surrogacy is an option for gay people. But even if it were still impossible for homosexual couples to have children, that is no reason to discriminate against. There are many hetero couples who are unable to conceive children for medical reasons, and others do not intent to have children in the first place. There are even many hetero couples who engage in sexual practices that dont even a theoretical chance of conceiving a child. I would fully support the notion that only married couples with children get e.g. tax benefits, because the reason they do is because the state wants to encourage people to get children. But why should for example a childless married couple over 60 receive those bonuses, while homosexual couples do not? Neither of them have any children, but the homosexual couple might theoretically still conceive one via medical means.


That may become issue once full equality is achieved and hate crimes against LBGTQ are no longer an issue, but as long as those are not achieved or exist, this is certainly not the case.

Quit if-ing. How many children did gays and lesbian sactually give birth to in Germany?
No, I am not talking about adoptions which so far have been sourced 100% by the normal heteros. I am talking about a lesbian actually delivering a baby whose sperm donor was a homosexual man.


Because laws are based on the statistics. Some hetero couples do not have kids. Many do. That's the chance we, the society, take. Maybe they tried but failed for any number of reasons. Call it the lottery of life.

No homo couples have kids. Ever. That lottery has only one outcome - zero kids. We, the society, should not be forced to buy tickets for that lottery.

In each case there's not be a donor. In case of female homosexuals a sperm donor. In this type of "family" a child will grow up without a father figure, in most cases they won't even know their biological father. That's hardly a healthy envirnment for a child to grow up.

The things are even more complicated, and outrageous, in case of male homosexuals. A woman would have to give away her biological child so a pair of pederasts could play a "family"

Because I'm sick of hearing about their "pride" and supposed oppression. No one cares what you do at home in your bedroom and we sure as **** don't need it advertised. Whenever some dude is all happy abou this "pride" or feels the need to bring it up all he's saying is "i eat semen, i suck cock, i take it up the ass, etc." no one gives a **** and straight people are sick of hearing it - even worse brainwashing kids into thinking such behavior is somehow normal. You don't hear about swingers or even fetishists going on about their sex lives. They go to some club or have their partners or whatever and that's it. They don't hold parades and turn it into a political and ideological tool and then demand special treatment or other **** just because some girl likes getting whipped and clothes pins on her nipples or a guy and his wife sleep with other people.

I have never heard it put as well as you just did, Dirk.
Sad part is that these sick people refuse to get help for being abnormal to the human species.
These maggots try to convince normal people that if they are not hurting anyone else that it is o.k. to do lie.

This is a huge problem and children shouldn't be exposed to these perverts!


They are only a tiny majority and they are forcing their sick beliefs upon the rest of the world, its like a war against normal people.


Its child abuse!

My question is: When are the real men going to finally stand up against these predators and put a stop to this attack on our children?

We'd have to start right in the classrooms at the children's schools Joker.
Fire every damn one of those Liberal Politically Correct Commie teachers.
That would be the starting point.
Then put God back in the schools to teach kids right from wrong and some morals.
You know the Bible spells it out very clearly........1 Corinthians 6:9 -10
"Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

As a religious country that Poland is why would/should they have any tolerance for homosexuals at all ?
The tiny 1.5% of homo's sure have a loud voice for reasons beyond me.

There is nothing supposed about it. They will be oppressed as long as gay couples don't have the same rights as hetero couples, it is as simple as that.


There are children who nowadays grow up with single parents, or whose parents are divorced. Having instead two loving fathers or mothers is certainly better than that.


Just goes to show how irrational your arguments are.

Hate, hate hate. That is really all there is to your arguments. And some strange persecution complex, because it somehow infringes on your rights when others are treated the same as you.

It's not hate but a proper name for it. I refuse to use a politically correct names such as "gay"


Then ask those children whether they would like to have both parents or just a single parent

Associating gay people with paedophilia is as hateful as it can get.


Then you must be in favour of gay couples, since they mean two parents for a child.

Of course they don't, when was the last time you read your Bible.


Wrong again, children need both a father and mother figure.
That's why the courts give the fathers the right to see their children and do things with them.


My argument is on the same side as the Lords.
Go tell the Lord that His argument is irrational because it infringes on your rights. lol
You are the one that is self serving by making up the rules as you go.

As if that was relevant, even to people who see that as more than a fantasy book. We don't stone adulterers anymore either. Or discriminate them in any other legal way.


Because he is their parent, not their father. Two men can be just as loving towards a child than a hetero couple.

It's very relevant if you are going to teach children morals, right from wrong, what is normal and to be a Christian, Meathead.


The statistics to that have already been established in this thread and you are wrong.


Just because a couple is divorced doesn't mean both parents don't get to spend time with their children.
How many children have been raised with step dads and step moms ?
Either you are gay or someone has brainwashed you but good son.