The law regarding something as serious as this should be concise and not open to misinterpretation
and you think it isn't?
as far as I know the main piece of regulation on the subject is as simple and concise as follows:
article 4a of the Family planning, protection of human foetus and conditions on which aboriton is allowed Act (translation mine)
Przerwanie ciąży może być dokonane wyłącznie przez lekarza, w przypadku gdy:
1) ciąża stanowi zagrożenie dla życia lub zdrowia kobiety ciężarnej,
Termination of pregnancy can be performed exclusively by a doctor in these cases:
1. the pregnancy poses a threat to the life OR health of the pregnant woman
there were 3 other cases in the original act (the act was passed in 1993) of which (after the two separate Consitutional Court rulings only one of which was recent) only 1 other remains namely: when there is a valid suspicion that the pregnancy is a result of a prohibited act
I actually should have said 'ignorance of the law' instead of 'misinterpretation of the law' in my previous post - I know many people raised the issue of the recent Constitutional Court ruling on abortion law having a 'chilling' effect on doctors but in my personal view it's just ignorance on their part - ignorance, cowardice and disregard for human life (yeah I know these are strong words)