History /
What do Poles owe to Germans? [396]
In a hurry, replying quickly
And you should remember that when Wa£ęsa was installed as Poland's first democratically elected post communist President, at the inauguration ceremony he received he seals of office from Poland's last President in exile Ryszard Kaczorowski.
Yes, that was interesting. However, I've never found anything to suggest that this was anything other than a symbolic act, as it didn't carry any legal significance at all.
I would be very interested to know if any of the decrees by the Government-in-Exile were transposed into Polish law after 1989.
The modern day Polish state has done absolutely nothing to counteract the Communist era legislation, and has routinely endorsed it by prosecuting people under those laws. They've gone after Jaruzelski and friends by prosecuting them under the 1952 Constitution, not under 1935 or 1921. The name of the State might have changed and the Constitution might have changed, but to all practical extents, the PRL is recognised as the legitimate Polish government at that time.
You just don't get it - the 'puppet parliament' pushing through these 'rules' (what rules?).
But are you sure that it didn't have the authority? The presence of Mikołajczyk as Deputy Prime Minister after resigning as the Prime Minister of the Government-in-Exile certainly gave a great deal of legitimacy to the parliament at the time, along with Prime Minister Morawski.
And the final question : if it wasn't a legitimate regime, why does the modern day Polish state recognise it?
I believe that all power is derived from the people for the people..
Would you agree then that the 1935 Constitution and Government-in-Exile were therefore illegitimate too?