The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Gruffi_Gummi  

Joined: 2 Jul 2011 / Male ♂
Last Post: 16 Nov 2012
Threads: -
Posts: Total: 106 / Live: 35 / Archived: 71

Displayed posts: 35 / page 1 of 2
sort: Latest first   Oldest first
Gruffi_Gummi   
16 Nov 2012
History / Pokłosie (film on Jedwabne) [36]

Was it balanced? Was it fair?

Czesław Bielecki (a prominent Polish politician, a Jew) has said:

Based on my family's wartime experiences, and on my own 1980's experience as a dissident, the painted picture of these evil and primitive villagers is a highly selective representation of the reality. I feel offended by this film.

Gruffi_Gummi   
10 Nov 2012
Genealogy / Wladyslaw and the English equivalent [22]

The choice of a English equivalents of Polish names will always be arbitrary. Władysław, actually, is not too difficult to propose an equivalent for. How about 'Vlad'? :)
Gruffi_Gummi   
7 Aug 2012
Food / Are there any Polish wines worth purchasing? [65]

PennBoy

"Wines" as defined by purists - most likely none. The region of Zielona Gora used to have wine industry, but these wines were known for their high acidity. Vitis vinifera require a lot of sun and heat to mature. Perhaps you can find decent wines made from hybrid grapes.
Gruffi_Gummi   
7 Jul 2012
Genealogy / Are Silesians people German/Germanic? [178]

Are Americans English? :)
Silesia has been a melting pot for German and Polish influences. There were people who declared themselves Polish. There were people who considered themselves Germans. There were people who were just saying "we are Silesians". And often the allegiances changed at a drop of a hat, because the intermarriage and cultural mixing allowed that.
Gruffi_Gummi   
7 Jul 2012
History / What do Poles owe to Jews? [586]

Oh dear, here we go again, Gummi making yet more unsourced unsubstantiated anti-semitic claims. Is there any point reply to them? Most probably not.

Oh, dear, this is the lesson I have learned: no matter how rationally one tries to discuss, the troll will always turn it into Alice's Wonderland, claim that 2+2=7.33 and that the discussant never provided evidence to the contrary. Then comes the unavoidable conclusion: the troll declares the discussant a vile anti-Semite.

"Here we go again" means that the troll perfectly well remembers the prior discussions, in which the troll participated. If he remembers the discussions, he should also remember the statistical data I provided about the language used at home. He should also remember the following Issac Singer quote. Discussing with the troll further is not worth my time.
Gruffi_Gummi   
6 Jul 2012
History / What do Poles owe to Jews? [586]

OK, Harry, one by one.
- Considering that the Polish army relied on conscript, this 100,000 number is hardly an evidence of any loyalty.
- The word "some" is (arguably intentionally) misleading. The unwillingness to integrate was a predominant trend, mandated by cultural factors that are visible even among present day Jews (consider, for example, the staunch opposition to inter-faith marriages expressed by rabbis, extrapolate this to the times when rabbis held absolute religious and substantial civil authority).

- The same criticism applies to your statement that "some Jews were communists or that some Jews showed no loyalty to the Polish state". It wasn't just "some". Jews constituted about 50% of the KomPartia in pre-war Poland, and this is not a statistical outlier. The trend continued until the Jewish faction within the Party lost the internal power struggle in 1968 (after which they mostly emigrated and found new occupations as denouncers of Polish anti-semitism, by the way). The trend was also visible among the early Bolsheviks, see, for example the dispatches by Capt. Schuyler from the U.S. expeditionary forces in Siberia (be warned, these dispatches are VERY politically incorrect).

- The statement that "some Jews did want to integrate and that some Jews did show loyalty" is absolutely true, on the other hand, and the word "some" is used correctly. There were such prominent examples as mathematicians Tarsk and Ulami, or Artur Rubinstein. The existence of such examples show that the Polish society made the integration possible, and if other Jews didn't integrate, it was primarily attributable to their choices and to the pressure of their own ethnic group.

- "the percentage of Jews in the Polish army matched the percentage of Jews in the Polish population as a whole"- again, when the army is conscripted, I expect nothing else. But you know, why don't you look at the pictures of the war cemeteries in Normandy and attempt a statistical sampling of Stars of David among crosses? You may like neither the result nor the conclusion...

- "some people try to claim that all Jews greeted the Red Army with joy" - you can always find people expressing fringe views, but while correctly dismissing them as fringe, the opposite side wants to also conveniently sweep under the carpet the true statement that the support for the invading Soviets was substantial among Jews.

Now, in this context we can state facts that the Poles "owe"

- Indeed, Jews were quite universally disliked, but don't cherry pick this statement, read to the end! Jews were NOT disliked based on genetic factors, as the denouncers of Polish anti-Semitism love to claim to create a straw man of a brute, primitive Pole. Jews were disliked as non-integrating aliens, not sharing the aspirations of the rest of the nation. On the other hand, a Jew could simply make a small effort to integrate and become recognized as a Pole. Just like that.

The example of Mexicans in the United States springs to mind: a person of Latino descent, speaking English and holding a regular job is considered a compatriot, and nobody makes any issue of his name ending with -ez. On the other hand, there is a rather universal dislike for people expressing allegiance primarily to Mexico, not bothering to learn English, gouging the welfare system (yes, this means that they formally are U.S. citizens) and claiming to be a poor, oppressed minority, discriminated against by Caucasian racists just "for being brown".

- The dislike indeed translated into anti-Jewish practices, but again, don't cherry pick: these were practices of individuals, never endorsed by any level the Polish government, either before, during or after the war (until the 1968 intra-Party power struggle, when the Gomulka's faction used anti-semitism as a state-sanctioned tool to secure the monopoly). On the contrary, occasionally the dislike manifested itself as pro-Jewish policies. Hard to believe? Consider, for example, the support of the Polish state for the establishment of Israel.

etzel.org.il/english/ac16.htm

- Some of the anti-Jewish acts crossed the line of crime. Such acts were duly, timely investigated and punished by Polish authorities. It is definitely hurtful when they are now regurgitated as "discoveries of new facts from the Polish history that should make Poles reconsider their role during the war". What am I supposed to reconsider, that a Volksdeutsch mayor of Jedwabne, together with German gendarmerie, gathered a group of Polish village idiots as supporters, other inhabitants as observers, and under the auspices of the German government organized a pogrom? While true, is this any rational basis for reconsidering the role of Poland and Poles played in World War II, as Jewish ethnocentric historians propose?

Harry, nobody is saying that individual Poles never committed any crimes against individual Jews. BUT practices such as: artificially inflating the numbers of incidents, manipulating facts to overemphasize the complicity of Poles, presenting Soviet occupiers and their collaborators killed by the resistance as innocent victims of ethnic hate, cherry picking incidents and bundling them together to create a clear victim/perpetrator perception (the Pole being given the latter role, naturally), has the following effects:

- Such historiography feeds the bigotry among Jews (well, perhaps this is an intentional, nation-building policy, but I see no reason to be forgiving)
- Such manner of discussion provokes in-kind responses, and then you are surprised that, in the context of the same discussion, Poles emphasize Jewish crimes.

I think the Jewish fighters who started the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto uprising were uniquely entitled to expressing the truth, and they did so by displaying the Polish flag alongside the Star of David - a fact that must be incredibly hard to explain for the proponents of the thesis that Poles were just as complicit in the Holocaust as Germans were. Why should I rather believe in the ethnocentric version of history peddled from Brooklyn, by descendants of schmucks who spent the war comfortably in the United States?
Gruffi_Gummi   
6 Jul 2012
History / What do Poles owe to Jews? [586]

Then, the complete truth also involves such elements as:
- The willingness (or a lack thereof) of the Jewish minority to integrate with the Polish society
- The level of participation of Jews in the totalitarian Communist apparatus
- The loyalty of Jewish citizens to the Polish state (or a lack thereof)

Are you sure that you want the complete truth? Based on my prior experience, you rather prefer a cherry picked subset of the truth, where the above listed subjects are carefully suppressed. You just want one element: the dislike of Jews by Poles (and its real and imagined consequences) to be emphasized, generalized, and stripped of context. But if you really want the whole truth, then I am ready to discuss.
Gruffi_Gummi   
6 Jul 2012
History / What do Poles owe to Jews? [586]

owe Jews the duty to tell the truth about (their greatly shared) history

Ahem, ahem, a complete truth?

When I report some elements of the truth and support them with legitimate sources, you call me an anti-Semite...
Gruffi_Gummi   
5 Jul 2012
History / What do Poles owe to Jews? [586]

Such a pity that your hated of Jews blinds you so.

Instead of playing the anti-Semitism card, you could simply type "Skidel uprising" or "Skidel revolt" in Google to corroborate. Reference to the revolt and to the participation of Jews in it can be found in: Shared History—Divided Memory: Jews and Others in Soviet-Occupied Poland, 1939–1941, Elazar Barkan, Elizabeth A. Cole, and Kai Struve. Also, you may find sources describing the town of Skidel as a shtetl. Your response, Harry, indicate that you are not interested in facts, just in peddling your anti-Polish bigotry and hatred.
Gruffi_Gummi   
26 Jun 2012
Life / Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland? [701]

In Poland not practiced, in Germany now outright illegal:

foxnews.com/world/2012/06/26/german-court-circumcision-on-jewish-boys-assault/

"German court: Circumcision on boys an assault"

Time to get rid of this ritual mutilation. All the claimed medical benefits can be just as well obtained through elementary hygiene.
Gruffi_Gummi   
5 May 2012
Genealogy / I have Jewish DNA, but only know of Polish ancestry . [120]

Also, did Jews and Catholics ever intermarry over a 100 years ago?

Intermarriage was uncommon (for religious reasons - non-Catholics could not marry within the Catholic faith, and, of course, interfaith marriages are even now an absolute no-no for religious Jews), but it wasn't necessary for mixing the DNA. :)
Gruffi_Gummi   
30 Apr 2012
History / Poland and Britain started WW2 [307]

DougTales
"Poland and Britain started WW2", murdered the Jews, raided Pearl Harbor, and finally helped the Nazis launch their Moon rockets from the secret Antarctic base. Yeah, we rule!
Gruffi_Gummi   
17 Apr 2012
Life / Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland? [701]

In order to survive it needs a host culture with a high temperature and very precise pH levels.

A virus is not a higher organism. It does not need to process energy to remain infective (in a broader sense "alive", although the term is disputable with respect to a virus). As for the pH - it is relevant to the cell entry of influenza (the conformational rearrangement of the hemagluttinin is pH-triggered), but HIV relies on a different mechanism, and the "very precise pH" is not necessary.
Gruffi_Gummi   
17 Apr 2012
Life / Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland? [701]

an unwashed one is less likely to be an environment where the virus could survive

According to what mechanism? As far as I know, the thing one washes away provides nice, semi-liquid, anaerobic conditions for the virus, facilitate the opening of skin pores (or even the formation of lesions, facilitating the viral entry).
Gruffi_Gummi   
17 Apr 2012
Life / Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland? [701]

I wonder if that's behavioural/cultural, rather than medical.

There are valid medical factors, IMO. Without the foreskin, it is easier to wash that body part, or, even without washing, the virus is more exposed to the environment and "dies" more quickly. If proper hygiene is maintained, however, both these mechanisms are moot.

P.S. "To się myje, a nie wietrzy" means "You are supposed to wash this, rather than ventilate".
Gruffi_Gummi   
17 Apr 2012
Life / Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland? [701]

Pretty well. The sad thing is that people in villages in some parts of Africa are told it prevents them getting HIV.

It does not prevent, but statistically it somewhat reduces the risk. Nevertheless, the same benefits are available through proper hygiene. So, here is my point: circumcision may be a good solution for people who have problems with maintaining hygiene. There is an appropriate saying in Polish: "to się myje, a nie wietrzy".
Gruffi_Gummi   
16 Apr 2012
Life / Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland? [701]

At least it is honest for you to say that you reject all the mountains of medical and scientific evidence for the benefits of circumcision.

All this evidence becomes irrelevant once you note that you can simply wash these body parts, instead of mutilating them. The benefits of washing are comparable to the benefits of mutilating, without the side effects. You know, some warm water, soap...

Speaking of hygiene - google the NIH grant 3U01MH066701-07S1. :)
Gruffi_Gummi   
26 Feb 2012
UK, Ireland / Raising Bilingual Children - How are you teaching your children? Your experiences? [74]

I have a comfortable situation: my wife is Asian, I am Polish, so we have adopted English as the primary language at home, and the "English first" principle with regards to our daughter.

I am aware of Chomsky's linguistic theories, but I observed that the early attempt of multilingualism has simply failed: the child was becoming a dictionary, capable of translating a very limited vocabulary between the three languages, to the insane joy of the grandparents. Yet the real language development (assembling words into phrases and sentences) just didn't want to happen - when the development of these skills lagged for about 5-6 months, I said "enough" and focused solely on English, before it became really too late. Our daughter is now within the top 1 percentile in the Iowa standardized test. If the extended family feels offended, it's their problem.

P.S. Naturally, opinions with regard to multilingualism will vary. The primary factor is the expectations. If by "proficiency" we understand being capable of communicating at the level "please hand me the TV remote", then, of course, multilingualism is possible. But if we want the child to think, reason and properly articulate, the brain power, IMO, should not be wasted on handling several languages.
Gruffi_Gummi   
2 Feb 2012
History / Polish inventors - what have they ever given to the world? [101]

The Teller-Ulam bomb is something that perhaps ought to be forgotten,

Science in itself is neutral from the ethical point of view. It's the application that counts. A bomb based on the Teller-Ulam design may vaporize a city, but it may be also used to deflect an asteroid on a collision course with the Earth. Even the former application is not entirely bad: the MAD doctrine (although seemingly literally mad) has kept the two superpowers from unleashing the World War III.

Also, the same scientific approaches that have been used by Ulam for the modeling of thermonuclear reactions can be used for other purposes. The Monte Carlo method (it was Ulam who proposed this name) is used, for example, in drug discovery.
Gruffi_Gummi   
20 Jan 2012
Law / Weapons laws in Poland. Carrying a concealed handgun? [918]

I apologize if I post redundant information - I don't have time to browse through previous pages. You may find my own experience useful.

1. As for a handgun - technically, if you have a permit in Poland, the law does not distinguish between concealed or not. The social expectation would be that you actually carry concealed.

Getting the permit, however, is next to impossible. Poland's laws are extremely prohibitive, compared to the rest of Europe. You need to provide a compelling reason (e.g. receiving threats).

2. There is a loophole with respect to long guns though. If you have a hunting license in the U.S., you can apply for a membership in the Polski Związek £owiecki, without the normally required 1 year training period - foreign hunter licenses, per PZ£ regulations, waive this requirement. You just need to take a hunter education class (a few months), pass an exam, and you will be free to bring your long guns to Poland. This is costly, compared to hunting in the U.S., but at least doable.

3. The process is NOT friendly, in any case. Actually, a couple of years ago I tried to return to Poland after some 8 years in the U.S. All the problems with bringing my guns to Poland constituted about 30% of the reasons why I gave up and moved back to the U.S.
Gruffi_Gummi   
14 Dec 2011
History / What proportion of the Polish population collaborated with the Nazis? [125]

There is a huge difference between patriotism and exceptionalism. Patriotism is not based on the principle of denying others their fundamental rights. Exceptionalism makes the rights of others outright subordinate to the needs of the group that considers itself exceptional.

As for "uniquely bigoted" and examples from other faiths: absolutely! Mullahs from Iran and Pakistan immediately spring to mind.
Gruffi_Gummi   
14 Dec 2011
History / What proportion of the Polish population collaborated with the Nazis? [125]

Lyzko: as I already have illustrated (post #88) with an example from contemporary America, it is Jews who don't want to assimilate, and who treat assimilation as an antithesis of Jewishness. Definitely, such attitudes slowly vanish, but this has nothing to do with the basic observation: Jews in the past didn't want to assimilate at all, and the cultural bias against assimilation is so strong that to this day it produces uniquely bigoted opinions from rabbis in America, such as the one that I quoted in #88.

Jews in larger urban centers were less dominated by religious factors, and thus more open to assimilation (prominent examples, in re: #106, include the already mentioned mathematicians Tarski and Ulam, also Artur Rubinstein, Julian Tuwim, Jan Kiepura).
Gruffi_Gummi   
13 Dec 2011
History / What proportion of the Polish population collaborated with the Nazis? [125]

Despite the 'quota system' in the US being designed to help a downtrodden minority.

Ok, this is really off-topic, but I'll bite. The AA system in the U.S. actually discriminates against a formerly downtrodden minority (Asians) for the sake of achieving strictly numerical quotas. The current "underrepresented" minorities' "downtrodden" status is attributable to cultural factors characteristic to these communities. All arguments to the contrary disintegrate when they are confronted with the success of East Asians, who don't fail to achieve, in spite of the past discrimination.
Gruffi_Gummi   
13 Dec 2011
History / What proportion of the Polish population collaborated with the Nazis? [125]

Please try to tell the truth

Please try to tell the truth: it was technically impossible for a professional self-government organization, where Jews constituted 65-70% (as in the case of the Lwów bar, see the reference in my above post) to introduce anti-Jewish policies out of anti-Jewish sentiments. There were university admission policies equivalent to affirmative action (introduced in 1937, if I am correct), but this neither constitutes making any country "unlivable" for the affected group, nor was unique to Poland or to the pre-war period.

I am happy that you don't support the present-day U.S. AA policies. Neither do I. Nevertheless, AJC does, and this substantially weakens the case of Jews against the Polish quota system.

There was no particular love in the pre-war Poland for the non-assimilating Jewish minority. However, this had NOT translated into genocide or a substantial participation in it during the war. The pre-war Polish solution was two-fold. 1. Assimilation (Tarski, Ulam etc.); 2. Actively supporting the establishment of the Jewish homeland in Palestine. You may find this Israeli source interesting, albeit it is yet another thing incompatible with the revisionist version of history most American Jews subscribe to.

He's also avoiding the issue of Jews being excluded from many (most) public sector posts and the mass expulsion of Jewish children

You forgot to add that these children were actually eaten by Polish anti-semites. Come on, there is no absurd you guys cannot say with a straight face.

In Poland there were no laws or institutional policies barring Jews from any public sector posts.
Gruffi_Gummi   
13 Dec 2011
History / What proportion of the Polish population collaborated with the Nazis? [125]

P.S. Numerus clausus is just a synonym of affirmative action, by the way.
Pre-war admission system in Poland wasn't banning Jews. It simply adjusted the number of admissions to the proportional representation in the population. As much as I personally disagree with ANY quotas, the quota system in pre-war Poland (introduced in a situation where Jews were already well represented among doctors and lawyers, and constituted over 50% of these professionals) was no different than, for example, what the American Jewish Committee advocated in the amici brief regarding some high profile AA cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. You guys not only can live with the quota system in the present-day U.S. You guys actively support it! Now, think a moment what makes your attitude toward the quota system in pre-war Poland so vastly different. There are several possible answers, and you are not going to like any of them, because they ultimately boil down to Jewish exceptionalism.
Gruffi_Gummi   
13 Dec 2011
History / What proportion of the Polish population collaborated with the Nazis? [125]

See what I meant? The myth is so persistent that JonnyM uses (in #105) an example of a family friend who "wasn't even Jewish" to illustrate the alleged persecution of Jews in Poland! Guys, hate blinds you so much that you don't even notice that your arguments are at the Alice in the Wonderland level of absurdity. Forget about historical facts. You know better.

Now, if you really want to hate Poles, then feel free. But what goes around, comes around. You probably wonder what may be responsible for the phenomenon of "anti-semitism without Jews"? Here you go - the hateful historical revisionism, by descendants of people who spent the war comfortably in Brooklyn and L.A., for example.

This concludes my participation in this thread. Thank you for the discussion.