News /
Donald Tusk's Government of Poland Continues to Oppress Poles [161]
Gee, I don't know. But they do, and we can either help those families to raise and educate
their children, or we can say "hey, you poor destitute half-wits, you shouldn't have those kids
in the first place, now you won't be able to feed and clothe them - HA HA!"
Rewarding failure is bad policy. I'm sure that we all have stories, but I've got one here. I live in a pretty nice building. Old construction, high ceilings, good area, all around nice place. A family lives above me in a government owned apartment. It's the only one in the building. These are the folks that keep me up at night, boxing, yelling, lots of kurwa's to be heard. Nearly impossible to kick out, but that's beside the point. Anyway, both parents are drunks, and there are five children. Two older, and three younger. I've gone up there countless times, and ended up having to lay out one of the older ones for beating the crap out of his little brother. Apparently I was the bad guy in that situation according to the authorities, and nothing was done, but again, I digress. Anyway, quick and dirty of it is that the eldest daughter is pregnant with her second bundle of joy. The eldest son has one of his own too. Was this the next generation that you had in mind? It seems the story is repeated over and over again (defiantly not singling out Poland here). It's what happens when you throw token amounts money at people to breed. Do you think those kids are going to end up being much different from their parents? Will that be a net gain for Polish society (and the welfare state), or would the gain be better achieved from a household that can afford to have children and raise them right? Personally, I'll go for the "quality" choice over quantity.
I'm for taking care of the families, it should be done through charity, like paying for private English lessons for two of the kids upstairs. It comes directly from my pocket, and they see that someone is paying for it, and believes in them. It's a direct relationship, much better than handouts.
If there had been fewer children, Harry would have had fewer clients (there would have been
demand for fewer teachers) and would have earned less money.
Negative. If there had been fewer children, more resources could have been spread amongst them, and Harry could charge more money (and thereby attracting the best possible talent) and spend more time with individual students (as they can afford to pay a premium for foreign teachers).
