The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by kondzior  

Joined: 16 Oct 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - O		 Last Post: 17 Apr 2021
Threads: Total: 11 / Live: 5 / Archived: 6
Posts: Total: 1026 / Live: 349 / Archived: 677
Speaks Polish?: YES

Displayed posts: 354 / page 2 of 12
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
kondzior   
2 Nov 2020
News / Women`s Party in Poland - a good means to end Women`s Hell ? [62]

Yes, there's even a thread on it.

It is just a smokescreen.
Why would PIS even NEED this ruling to change the law? They have a single majority in parliament. It's not an issue that requires an amendment to the constitution. They could go ahead and pass a law right here, right now, that would ban abortion completely. But they don't. And they didn't the other three or whatever times when the draft law was submitted to parliament by pro-lifers. The draft laws were always stuffed into the trash after first reading, with Kaczyński always voting against adopting them. It is nonsensical to say they suddenly decided to implement the thing they trashed a number of times before, and that they'd need some weirdo roundabout methods of doing it by first obtaining the court's ruling on the matter.

Everyone was pissed with PIS about their retarded lockdown measures, their lack of preparation for muh second wave, the anti-fur law, Sasin's 70 million, etc. etc. etc. So they took this ruling straight out of their ass because they knew it would redirect (or at least redistribute) the outrage from themselves onto other entities, and that the people would start arguing amongst themselves again instead of burning down the parliament building.

It was a trap that all the local retards very predictably walked into. I would say Kaczyński is brilliant to know his enemies so well and to anticipate their reactions with such precision if the entire thing wasn't so foocking sad.
kondzior   
2 Nov 2020
News / Abortion still under control in Poland [2986]

The constitutional court made a ruling that parts of the law on abortion are unconstitutional, which means they need to be changed. Yes, this includes things like terminal conditions of the fetus that are going to lead to certain deff after birth.

However, the court does not have executive or legislative power. Abortion won't be "banned" until the law is amended to do that. And:

- Various governments in recent history straight up ignored the rulings of the court on matters they found inconvenient.
- The action that needs to be taken after the ruling is issued has a very comfy deadline, which while I don't know what it is specifically, I think it might even be two years?

- The law can be amended with enough legal gymnastics to appease the ruling while not actually changing anything.
- The most likely course of action will be that the law will be amended to continue allowing abortions of children with terminal conditions but will prohibit aborting cases such as downies.

- The government had countless occasions to ban abortion before but didn't. To think it will do so now is lunacy.

This is a gigantic nothingburger, and as each and every single other abortion drama of the last five years, it's based on nothing but lies and is heated up by demagogues who profit from people's ignorance regarding the legislative process and general lack of political knowledge in order to further their own agenda. And I'm once more profoundly disgusted by it.
kondzior   
2 Nov 2020
News / Abortion still under control in Poland [2986]

You are missing quite a few variables here:
- can you really accurately pre-determine if a child will die within a few hours and can that accurately be regulated per law?
- there *IS* also the Moral complicatiion of the murder of a human, just because this human is disabled. That a fetus isn't alive is not a scientific fact, what life is is a highly debated topic because it's foocking complicated. The Law can only ever define if a fetus can have rights.

This whole issue is not easily solved and the "but it's the womens body" thing is just a feminist construct, to have only women have a say in reproduction, you can not expect everyone to believe that (sh!t).

Just listen to what you are saying here, even if you argue that the polish government does not know better, you deem the women to be the sole arbiter of what is right and what is not. That is not better in the least, there is (or should be) at least one more person involved, possibly 2.

I do not have a good answer on that topic personally, currently I am more occupied with understanding how Abortion can or can not be fair when looked at the opposing interest of the sexes, but that this is clear and done deal is a ridiculous position.

In fact I would assume that this will be an issue that will never be fully "solved".
kondzior   
15 Oct 2020
News / Years of Poland in the EU - assessment of pros and cons [1158]

Brexit only happened because TV Globo and Radio Homo slept on their laurels. They all thought it was a done deal (i.e., the UK wouldn't leave), so they didn't bother going into overdrive with an incessant onslaught of propaganda.

I mean, there WAS an incessant flow of propaganda, but it wasn't dialled up to 11 like we would've seen had they got their wish for a second referendum for instance. All the useful idiots would've cranked up the amount of voter fraud, too, if they hadn't been told the UK was going to stay.
kondzior   
29 Sep 2020
News / Poland rejects international criticism over LGBT rights [28]

49 ambassadors in Poland (including that of Venezuela!) to co-sign it?

And including Albania XD.
Does Albania have gay parades? Also lol at the US and Venezuela signing the same letter. Peak clown world.
kondzior   
25 Sep 2020
Life / How are electric cars doing in Poland? [413]

Consider this:
Rudolf Diesel ran his diesel engine on vegetable oil and peanut oil. He didn't have access to fossil fuel.
He wrote a whole manifesto for his hopes the working class in villages and towns the world over would grow their own fuel and use it to power the diesel engine.

He died under (what some would call suspicious circumstances) on his way to Britain to convert their submarine fleet from petrol to diesel.
Petrol engines were 3x less efficient than diesel engines and yet it was petrol engines that were given to the public in Britain until the fuel crisis in the 70s that prompted the turbo diesel attachment to speed up the diesel engine.

All of the most reliable engines in every industry that fuelled the growth of the west were almost entirely diesel because of efficiency and reliability.

The fuel "diesel" was only named after Rudolf Diesel died, and most people are completely unaware that alternative fuels can be used to power the diesel engine.

Most people I've brought this up with think petrol is for petrol engines and diesel for diesel in much the same way as you would say electricity is for powering an electric car.

The reasons for not using vegetable oil (a clean burinig fuel without the polluting effects/contaminants of fossil fuel) are all weak.
The engine is essentially the same today as it was 100 years ago.

So in summary, if black Africans stopped killing white South African farmers, and learned the skill of farming from them...it could solve a lot of problems for them and other countries. And it could go a long way towards solving one big problem.

But then governments wouldn't get everyone financing electric cars that are just PCs on wheels would they? Electric cars that are not going to be financially viable to repair, so the working classes are going to be shackled to financing them/trading in every few years for the entirety of their driving lives.

So there it is. Pollution is real, but it needs to be seperated from what is the transfer of wealth and socialism under the politics of "global warming".
kondzior   
12 Sep 2020
Life / How are electric cars doing in Poland? [413]

The vastly more advanced Edison cells powered the electric fleets of 1901 and these cars were far more comfortable and well designed than toy crap like the exploding Tesla produced by Elon Musk the fake entrepreneur who is completely government funded to pretend it is so.

lowtechmagazine.com/overview-of-early-electric-cars.html
kondzior   
5 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Post-'89 Polish foreign policy always openly supported any attempts of any eastern european or post-soviet state to democratize and westernize. In the case of Belarus this also included things such as polish public TV operating a TV channel airing in Belarussian and Russian.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belsat_TV

Kicking as many states out of Russian orbit is geopolitically in Poland's interest. Of course it also just so happens Belarus shares a border and is in close military ties with Russia, which adds further reason for Poland to support a change in status quo on Belarus, even if it is fabulously optimistic to think Belarus will happily switch sides away from being a Russian staging ground (Crimea showed the problem with that).

There's also historical baggage similar to Ukraine (polish minority, parts were former polish land in ancient history etc.), but that's usually just a smokescreen for the plebeians. There's also a Belorussian minority in Poland. So the usual eastern european mess.
kondzior   
18 Aug 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Now you go topple the regime down and put your children in chaos and complete unknown

Vatniks were telling similar sh!t about Yanuk. And it was even somewhat plausible in his case. But Lukashenko cannot be unelected. He ruled country for 27 years ffs. So what does your proposition to get rid of Lukashenko looks like?
kondzior   
16 Aug 2020
History / Battle of Warsaw - One hundred years ago [7]

No, Poland saved western civilization three times and deserves credits therefor: Battle of Liegnitz (diverting Mongol hordes from northern European plains), Battle of Vienna 1683 kicking Kebab ass and crushing Bolshevik scum in front of Warsaw in 1920.
kondzior   
13 Aug 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Eh, the Belarusians are getting beaten up pretty badly by the riot police. Hopefully it will end up with another Maidan but without annexations and war, which would damage the region again (including Russia).

Also, yet another example of Eastern Euro protests that do not feature smashing shops, looting them, throwing rocks at apartment blocks, burning regular people's cars, pulling random people out of lorries, forcing other regular people to crawl on their knees, etc. Very focused on the state.

The knee-jerk reaction against the protests just because the Dems and such support them is unwarranted. Say, they were supporting Ukraine too, and it now has unprecedented freedoms for the nationalist right, unlike Russia where everyone is in prison. Broadly speaking, they tend to support some of the better states like Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, etc. for foreign policy reasons even as they unsuccessfully try to push them for internal politics.
kondzior   
11 Aug 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Poland Calls For Extraordinary EU Summit On Belarus

Poland on Monday called for an emergency European Union summit on the situation in Belarus after clashes in the night in Minsk following a disputed presidential election.

"The authorities have used force against their citizens, who are demanding change in the country. We must support the Belarusian people in their quest for freedom," Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said in a statement.
kondzior   
7 Aug 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

claim they live in a police state

if someone is playing with fire, then don't let him cry that he got burned
o kurwa the foocking police are chasing us for doing roughhouse, what gives?
kondzior   
7 Aug 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

A leftist rag was waving on the monument of the Savior. It does not matter at this point whether the hour, minute, second was fluttering, whether anyone actually dared to touch Christ's face with the left banner, or only waved him in front of his face. The very fact that in the country of John Paul II whoever dares to even think about such a slander is symptomatic - leftist cancer is rolling this unhappy land. Fagots and leftists should immediately stop being "tolerated", since they cannot respect the already hardly maintained tolerance for their perversions, resulting only from Christian mercy. More than once or twice, the other cheek was turned, because we thought naively that they were our erring brothers. It turned out to be a mistake - fagots are not our brothers, but a leftist junk funded by someone else's money, which we do not put up against the wall only by the Fifth Commandment.
kondzior   
1 Aug 2020
Po polsku / Elity wygrywają. Z narzędziami, które posiadamy nie ma nadziei dla ludzkości. [14]

Powodem, dla którego prawica stale się cofa, jest fakt, że zasadniczo nie chcą angażować się we wzajemne wyniszczenie. Gdy konflikt osiągnie pewien poziom, prawica będzie na ogół oferować niewielkie ustępstwa, aby go zakończyć. Natomiast lewica jest gotowa zniszczyć kraj w służbie swojej sprawie.

Na początku nie był to problem, ale w końcu dochodzą do tego setki małych ustępstw, co doprowadziło do obecnej sytuacji na zachodzie.
kondzior   
1 Aug 2020
Po polsku / Elity wygrywają. Z narzędziami, które posiadamy nie ma nadziei dla ludzkości. [14]

Ludzie, niektórzy z was znają ten termin, ale pomyślałem, że powinienem się upewnić, że odbędzie się tutaj dyskusja na temat poprawnych terminów i ich używania: Metapolityka.

Jak wszyscy wiecie, narzekanie na coś w Internecie niczego nie zmienia. Ale może tak samo jest z próbami zmiany tego w parlamencie. To wtedy, gdy masz władzę polityczną (jak Trump, PIS, lub niektóre partie prawicowe w niektórych krajach europejskich), ale brakuje ci władzy metapolitycznej. To jest w zasadzie potencjał kontrolowania opinii publicznej. W rezultacie Trump musi nieustannie walczyć z kłamstwami i decyzjami podejmowanymi na ich podstawie przez MSM, intelektualistów uniwersyteckich i najbogatsze firmy na świecie.

Pomyśl o tym w ten sposób: dlaczego "intelektualny" jest w naszych czasach terminem obraźliwym (dla mnie jest)? Ponieważ każdy, kogo to określenie dotyczy i jest publicznie widoczny, jest pełen gówna. Każdy "odważny, wolnomyślicielski" jest lewicowym radykałem, który absolutnie nie jest w konflikcie z głównym nurtem. Dzieje się tak, ponieważ lewica ma absolutną metapolityczną władzę i dlatego może forsować każdą narrację, jakiej chce, a obecnie przeważnie nawet rażące kłamstwa.

Czy mogli to zrobić kilka dekad temu? Nie, ciągle przesuwają Overton window. Prawdą jest, że boomersi mogli łatwo zatrzymać ten trend. Dziś istnieje realne, a w pewnym momencie zaistniało niebezpieczeństwo, że jeśli się odezwiesz, możesz stracić pracę.

Jednak patrząc na lata 50. lewicowi ideolodzy byli w bardzo podobnej sytuacji i w tym czasie media nie były pod ich kontrolą i same musiały wystąpić przeciwko mainstreamowi. Ale udało im się wprowadzić ogromne zmiany, nawet bez władzy politycznej.

Teraz pytanie brzmi, jak wiele z tego można powtórzyć po prawej stronie. Brakuje mu poparcia światowych elit. Jednak jego ideologia, na przykład dwie płcie kontra dwa miliony, narody posiadające własne kraje kontra genocyd, katolicyzm kontra szatan, jest zakorzeniona w rzeczywistości. Ale jeśli piszesz biznesowy e-mail bez języka gender, może to wpędzić cię w kłopoty, co tu mówić o wystąpieniu bezpośrednio przeciwko elitom. Zasadniczo wymaga to ludzi, którzy nie przejmują się własną przyszłością.

Oto krótkie nagranie wideo autorstwa jednego z takich ludzi, Martina Sellnera (po niemiecku), na ten temat. Ruchy tożsamościowe w Europie zmierzają w tym kierunku. Mogą nie być zbyt skuteczne, ale jest przeciwko nim wiele represji. Myślę, że to wskazuje, że przynajmniej trochę szkodzą elitom.

bitchute.com/video/G5Ew6oyA588
kondzior   
26 Jul 2020
News / Thousands of Polish women attend Czarny Piątek rally in Warsaw [780]

Do tell us the specific parts which you claim are

First example::
"Parties shall take the necessary measures to promote changes in the social and cultural patterns of behaviour of women and men with a view to eradicating prejudices, customs, traditions and all other practices which are based on the idea of the inferiority of women or on stereotyped roles for women and men.

As I said, it is hidden among legalese finely-dressed globalized and homogenized culture.
Forced gender courses, white guilt, white fragility, forced gender reassignment and so on.
Name it "treaty on violence against women" and accuse of fascism and sexism whoever doesn't bend the knee to sign it.
kondzior   
26 Jul 2020
News / Thousands of Polish women attend Czarny Piątek rally in Warsaw [780]

Istanbul Convention

I just read it out of curiosity, and much like all other such subversive legalese, it's pretty nefarious. For a longer while I was wondering what the big deal was about it, because for the most part it's your standard "plz think of the poor exploited ppls in bad families who stay silent out of fear, here's sum statistics." Eventually it gets much more juicy in the section dedicated to practical measures that should be taken to combat abuse/violence (not just domestic), namely working against traditional gender roles and definitions, or concepts derived from religion. It's p. much finely-dressed globohomo.
kondzior   
23 Jul 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

Your whole argument comes down to "being different is bad"....

No. "Being different is not normal". Being gay is not persecuted, you have legal rights, so everything is rosy. Yes, personal prejudices will never go away, because they are based in human instincts, but that's what life is. Some people might think you are **** because you are from the village on the opposite side of the river, why should you care.
kondzior   
23 Jul 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

Given those odds getting upset that 2 or so per cent of men don't reproduce seems kind of silly....

Continuing from the past post - the greatest silliness is openly lying to others, be they gay or not, that living as a gay - consciously turning your back on creating a family and children of your own - is somehow a "normal" lifestyle.

It's just a normal reaction to refuse to take part in this hypocrisy and in the normalization of the deviance, just because a small segment of the population (not even all of the gays) will feel better hearing this lie. And the fact that we are being pressured to believe and perpetuate the lie makes it all the more ugly.

Being gay is never going to be "normal". What's normal is to take a wife/husband, have babies and help them on, help each other on your way through life and up to death.
kondzior   
23 Jul 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

And it has seen fit to keep homosexuality around.... so......

And have always been a deviation from the normal. What's bending the natural is to coerce people to pretend that they are not a deviation.

I'm left-handed. Left-handed people have also existed forever. I wouldn't get miffed at people refusing to accept this deviation as something normal, so what's wrong?
kondzior   
23 Jul 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

Mother nature doesn't care.

The way Nature "shows it cares" is through evolution. Some traits are encouraged, some are discouraged. Some parts become more specialized, others are phased out.

Gay rights are about redirecting raw sexual urges into ways that can work for society (and giving gay people a stake in society).

What counts in this world is what you leave behind - how many trees did you plant, how many children did you raise into being good people. Everything living on this planet lives in order to best pass its genes. What does a gay man leave? Nothing, he will be buried in the ground one day, probably with some other guy's sperm up his ass. It's a wasted life. And it's not just gays. The same applies to every shitlord frequenting brothels, afraid to talk to woman normally, to every dumb woman who comes to believing that children are too much work and will screw up her lifestyle.

Sure, there have been gay men with great achievements in arts and in science. There have also been non-gay men with great achievements. But even with the value they brought to the society, 9 out of 10 people would prefer that their son gives them grandchildren to their son being a genius musician but gay. And this sentiment is also natural.
kondzior   
23 Jul 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

Societies treated gays with utter hostility coz they were unproductive, I mean they didn`t bear children.

Human beings, as rational animals, are by our nature directed towards (among other things) procreation and living in society. Since part of our nature is that we are animals, we procreate by sexual reproduction, which is why men and women have natural tendencies towards life-giving conjugal act. Conjugal act involves one man and one woman and its natural end is fertilization of an egg and conception of a new human life. Furthermore, a man and a woman are by nature directed towards family life, for family is the basic unit of society, necessary for the children to be properly raised into healthy adults that can fulfil their natural (and supernatural) ends as human beings. A reminder that a family is a unit that consists of a husband, his wife and their children.

Sodomy is not a conjugal act. It is contrary to human nature, since it is contrary to procreation. It represents a perversion of the natural order and an affront to the truth. Anus is not a sex organ. Sodomite perverts cannot create life. It is contrary to proper raising of children, for sodomites cannot form a family, that is necessary for children to grow into healthy adults. Thus it is contrary to natural tendency of humans qua humans to live in a society.

Since they cannot form a family, sodomites work to destroy it. They are actively targeting children. They have taken their degeneracy to the streets, TV, schools, libraries and even kindergartens. It is well past time to stop acquiescing to their demands, and to start working on their eradication. If they try to expose themselves to our children, we must prevent them by any means.

edukator
kondzior   
22 Jul 2020
News / Poland's post-election political scene [4080]

I'm all for individual gay rights

Have you ever stopped to ask yourself where all this societal "bias" came from, and why it is has been present in almost every single civilized culture (save a few exceptions) throughout history? Societies disgust towards homosexual behaviour is not something that materialized out of thin air, nor was it learned from religion (after all, what made it manifest itself in religion?). Have you perhaps considered the fact that over thousands of years, society has come to realize the destructive and disgusting tendencies that come with accepting homosexuality? This isn't even mentioning the fact that homosexuality is a psychological/hormonal disorder, and that the normalization of it very often leads to increased rates of homosexuality.