Food / What do non-Poles think about eating the following Polish foods? [1450]


As if you were going to use separate plates too so your wife could do more washing! LOL!

Poles at parties usually pile their plates high with everything on offer so they don't have to get back in line. Maybe you would know this if you ever got invited to one. :)

Besides, poppy seed cake is often made too savory. So much so that you could get away with spreading butter on it.

Being on the same plate isn't going to ruin the taste of the sausage.


He is the anti-woke resistance. Because of him Poland will not perish!


You might as well. Once your son and his generation become of voting age the woke left will only be read about in history books!

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Even though feminists hate men because they have daddy issues and problems with male authority in reality it is women who abhor having other women in positions of power and having to take orders from other women.


They would take all the money and never come into work.


They do that now.


Ever notice how feminists demand entry into male spaces while insisting women retain their own spaces?


They want free on-demand abortions now even at the moment of birth. If they had it their way they would take at least six months off after having an abortion too.


They will take any male because you will never see a woman lift heavy objects or repair sinks for another woman.

Food / What do non-Poles think about eating the following Polish foods? [1450]


Maybe it was message meant for you to say you are an overbearing parent as most leftist households are when it comes to their uncompromising ideology and demand for conformity. :)


You are suffering from white savior complex as is the case with most overbearing parents in leftist households who love to virtue signal. :)

Food / What do non-Poles think about eating the following Polish foods? [1450]


Nah, read the t-shirt.

They prefer to be awake rather than woke like you.

News / Grzegorz Braun extinguishes Hanukkah candles in Polish Parliament [459]


Many Jews or their ancestors have voluntarily converted to Christianity and even rose to prominent positions in it.

The first 'Jewish' archbishop of Canterbury heads to Israel

timesofisrael.com/the-first-jewish-archbishop-of-canterbury-heads-to-israel/

Jewish-born actor Shia LaBeouf converts to Catholicism, intends to become deacon

timesofisrael.com/jewish-born-actor-shia-labeouf-converts-to-catholicism-intends-to-become-deacon/


No.

Christianity is trinitarian, Judaism is not.

News / Grzegorz Braun extinguishes Hanukkah candles in Polish Parliament [459]


Not at all. You think your argument is watertight but it has too many holes in it.

Your era of comfortably taking it for granted that no one would notice or be shamed into not talking about it is over.


Well if they want to be distinguish from everyone else then you agree they should be issued ID cards and numberplate for their cars showing that they are different from the rest of society.

How else should be they be treated differently?


Great idea since they go to great pains to show they don't actually want anything to do with the society that hosts and tolerates them.

News / Poland - A True Bastion and Defender of Free Speech [250]

Spilling American blood and treasure (literally) overseas in any era in no way kept America in a state of isolation.

It meant trillions of dollars not invested in America's infrastructure and society.

It meant millions of American lives left scarred, disabled or dead for generation after generation.

News / Poland - A True Bastion and Defender of Free Speech [250]

Wrong.

America has been involved in constant wars globally before the Great Depression (WWI) and after it (WWII, Korea, Vietnam).

Here is a much longer list: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States

Europe enjoyed great long periods of great prosperity over the centuries and in particular after WWII thanks to American investment both economically and militarily.

Europe has no excuse to be so much against freedom of speech other than its penchant for such totalitarianism learned under decades of communist regimes in the East and Socialist regimes in the West.

History / Life in communist Poland - personal relations [503]


Lies!

Here are the facts!

President Duda Presents Teacher Salary Bill on Wednesday, Excluding Funding for Public Television

"President Andrzej Duda of Poland is set to present a bill on Wednesday, focusing on salary increases for teachers."

polanddaily24.com/president-duda-presents-teacher-salary-bill-on-wednesday-excluding-funding-for-public-television/politics/34821

Over to you to personally and publicly thank President Duda! :)

"The bill, expected to address the government's commitment to a 30-percent salary hike for teachers, has drawn attention for its exclusion of funds earmarked for the acquisition of public media."

30%! Yikes!

News / Grzegorz Braun extinguishes Hanukkah candles in Polish Parliament [459]

When these identifiers are nothing but shifting sands and randomly used and defined only to gain advantage or avoid responsibility then they should be disempowered and not recognized at all.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


The legal presumption is that the wife's husband is the biological father.

Therefore the burden is on the husband to go to court and prove otherwise.

That's what life is like for men under feminism.

Poland is a patriarchy? LOL. You're crazy!


And it is nearly always women.

This is why joint petitions are needed to correct this imbalance of catering to the wild whims of women.


Women don't bring more and you couldn't provide a single example to show they do.

When it comes to housework women don't to do any.

You've been saying so yourself over and over again and this problem is universal.

Does Unequal Housework Lead to Divorce? Evidence from Sweden

"We find women's housework reports drive these relationships, with important consequences for men's relationship satisfaction and women's relationship commitment."

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0038038516674664

Women are not committed to holding up their end of the relationship and this leaves men dissatisfied.


Spoken like a true feminist. You completely lack self-awareness. You value relationships based solely on what a man contributes and how much more he should contribute. And when a wife doesn't and won't contribute your lame excuse is that such women are "too tired" to honor their wedding vows and so the husband should do more.

News / Grzegorz Braun extinguishes Hanukkah candles in Polish Parliament [459]


Only liars, hypocrites, trolls and crazy people have wild inconsistencies in their arguments.

At the end of the day you only want homogeneity for your own in-group no matter where they reside.

And your own in-group is a complete social construct based on a highly selective narrative.


Such people only want to be Polish on paper when it suits them such as applying for benefits or when they get arrested.

News / Grzegorz Braun extinguishes Hanukkah candles in Polish Parliament [459]

News / Grzegorz Braun extinguishes Hanukkah candles in Polish Parliament [459]


Hyphenated does not equal assimilated.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Yes, absolutely.

But nature is cruel and doesn't care.

We evolved to pair bond and have children during a short window of time when both the male and female are young and at their fittest.

Biologically women know this but they believed the hype and thought they would some how stay forever young and had many options at their disposal.

Not so. There are many stories of women freezing their eggs for huge sums of money to delay their "family planning" only to find out the procedure didn't work when they were physically older even though they were mentally "ready to settle down and start a family".

Also, men don't want to settle down with an older women and just hear her talk about the "amazing career" she made for herself while knowing she had dozens and dozens and dozens of sexual partners along the way.

What women don't realize is they have to bring something to the table. But they can't. They know they can't and brazenly believe they shouldn't have to offer a man anything and that he should be grateful to her nonetheless.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Working women wanted to "have it all" but now resent "having to do it all".

With that said, what hasn't been discussed is the propensity of women to overstate not just the amount but the quality of work they claim to do at home. Why would any husband want to help with any work if it is obvious to him that the wife is trying to do little or nothing or so poorly in the hope the husband loses his patience and does it himself so then she will never have to?

What also hasn't been discussed is how much money are these so-called "working" women contributing financially to rent/mortgage payments, utility bills, groceries, amount in taxes on personal income (less if women are earning less as they usually claim or less if they are only working part-time or possibly none if they are working strictly for cash)? If men earn more and therefore contribute more financially to the relationship then why on earth should they also have to do manual work around the house for free? Who are the real freeloaders here? (Hint: It's women).


See response above.

Also, can any women guarantee 100% that the children are biologically that of the father/husband they are living with?

No then can't. Or rather no they won't because women always know who the real father is.



If the father/husband has been cucked by an unfaithful wife who was already resentful about the division of house chores then why should he look after another man's child?


Nope. I'm just honest and you are not ready to have an honest conversation.


Feminists have never acknowledged this during their campaigns for power. Their mantra over and over again was women can do anything a man can do and often times their propaganda would do everything to make it look like women can do everything better than men.

And if women know they have physical limitations then they know they are shifting the burden of this back onto men rather than pulling their own weight and sharing equally in the responsibilities of the job. Instead they demand to have jobs they know they are unfit for then scream about discrimination if they don't get it.


Nope. Plain misandry. Read the paragraph above. Women are privileged and want to be catered to and don't care what happens to men as a result.


Do your own homework rather than expecting a man to do it for you. :)


If you believe in gender equality as you claim then a divorce petition should always be filed jointly by both the husband and wife.

It shouldn't be for one party (nearly always women) to file for divorce and then let the courts decide (nearly always in favor of women).

Travel / Poland in photo riddles - part 3 [818]


Why not? You are full of it after all!


For show! Because you like to show off.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Like I said before, men are expendable and women are privileged and women have always been fine with this status quo.

Indeed, although women have often publicly protested against war this was only done self-servingly to look virtuous (without any repercussions), to burnish their communist credentials, or selfishly because they feared if their husbands were killed they would have to find another source of income.

Women have never protested for the equal right to fight in war.

Many women have also publicly shamed men who didn't want to fight.

The only other things women throughout history have taken to the streets to protest are the right to vote, the right to have an abortion and for the rights of migrants.


That's because they know it's hard to have and maintain unit cohesion needed for police and military work when someone who is only there to satisfy a diversity metric can't and won't pull their own weight and instead is only interested in creating a toxic work environment based on gossip, seeking entitlement for themselves, and at the same time doing everything to destroy the reputation of others whom they simply don't like for personal reasons.


Why not Poland? After all, Poland has a communist past and is presently feminist.


Reading comprehension. Plenty of information not only on official sites but many such stories told on PF.


Poland but the bias against men and in favor of women can be found all throughout the feminist West.


You said you regard divorce as a basic right and not some privilege. This only confirmed that you believe that the responsibilities of marriage can be disregarded at any time and for any reason. Especially so when you know the courts disproportionately favor women and have done so for decades.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Yes, and those feminist courts have a lopsided track record of siding with women. Their decisions are not made on a case-by-case basis. The wife and husband would have been deemed equally responsibly during the marriage and therefore joint custody should continue after a divorce.


Your response is so sexist.

You regard divorce as a right but conveniently disregard marriage as a responsibility of both the husband and wife. Why else are vows taken? I know, I know, women don't take vows seriously unless they apply only to the man.

Like I said, women not men are mostly likely to file for divorce. Women wield their "right" to file divorce as a weapon because they know full well that the man will be disadvantaged.


I knew that was your position all along because you don't actually believe in equality between men and women.

Sure, you will say you do but only as long as there is no cost to yourself or other women. And when a situation exists where women have advantages over men you are fine with this and try to convince men that this is what equality is supposed to look like.


Nope. For men, it's a necessity and expectation. Society doesn't look after men. Society expects from men in order to provide to women.


Okay, so give an example in recent years where being a woman rather than a man was the deciding factor in a positive outcome for everyone and not just women. Having representation doesn't count.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


It is fair. If a woman wants a professional career then that is a personal choice. The alternative is to stay home and take care of the children. Since the children are already at home and become more and more self-sufficient each year there is no reason the women can't do chores around the house as well.


Poland is always about a decade out of sync with other countries. Give it time.


There isn't a single instance in history where the female gender was the deciding factor in something meaningful apart from population numbers. And clearly that is a responsibility and job that today's women simply do not want.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Why were most of the men killed?

Because men are deemed as expendable and have always been ordered to serve.

There has never been an equal expectation that women should fight to protect the society they live in and benefit from.

Women have only participated on a strictly voluntary basis but most of them don't and wouldn't anyway.

The war in Ukraine is only the latest in a long list of examples of this gender disparity.

Even in situations when women have voluntarily joined the military their pregnancy rates skyrocket when orders are given to deploy and enter into combat. Each and every time.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Great. So when you as a woman come home late from a construction site or making lorry deliveries all day you will finish the laundry and dishwashing your husband couldn't do because he needed to give more time caring for the children during the day. Yeah, sure you will.


You are wearing blinders and only see that women in traditional countries are not earning as much or more money than men.

In developed economies both genders often need to work multiple jobs to try to get by and even then access to quality of life issues like home ownership and proper medical care are becoming scarcities.


It is sexist, female-chauvinism to assume only a woman has the ability to take care of children and a house and therefore the responsibility is on men to prove they can as well.

Why not give instant joint custody without any litmus test for men only? Oh right, because you are not about to cede any power and privilege that's why.

Statistically, women disproportionately file for divorce compared to men. So if you say you are willing to give up power and privilege then you will agree that no divorce petition should proceed unless both parties give their consent. Therefore in most cases a wife's divorce petition should be denied unless the husband agrees to it. You would agree to this, right?

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


What kind of "manual" jobs? Sitting at a supermarket checkout?

It would drive women absolutely crazy knowing they had to work outdoors in the cold or heat doing filthy and even dangerous work while their husbands were at home simply doing chores. You think women in this scenario would be having more children? Yeah, sure, but only if it would get them out from having to do real manual work.


No, I don't. But she shouldn't expect silence on this issue so she can "feel" she is right.


I agree. Feminists, like children, only believe in having rights and never having to face responsibility.

When the fall comes (and it will) they will still blame men.


Sure, sure. "Shared fairly" but only to women's satisfaction.


Not universally. Having both men and women working depressed wages while causing ever widening economic disparities.


Okay, so what privileges will you as a woman give up in exchange for men taking on more duties and responsibilities?

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


No country can survive on estrogen.


Polish families have maintained a nuclear structure for many generations that were beneficial to the birthrates as well as the wellbeing of children and society.

You obviously have a very particular feminist notion in your head as to how that structure should be arranged and maintained but it won't work.

Studies consistently show that women who live in a fantasy world where gender roles and responsibilities are flipped in order to privilege themselves even more are still unhappy.

Having men work and having women stay at home to care for children is what works best consistently and all across society.

Feminists like yourself envision yourselves getting all dressed up and pretending to do work by sitting at a desk in an comfortable office and updating spreadsheets while the men stay at home cooking, cleaning and caring for children.

Feminists like yourself never see yourselves getting dirty and tired from doing manual labor all day at a construction site while the men are at home cooking, cleaning and caring for children.


Lies.

It's feminist-matriarchal dogma to punish a father by depriving him of his children while still expecting him to pay for financial support.


No you don't. Women never want to cede their power and privilege.


You're not about to admit that many women don't want men taking a part and not just after a divorce either.

Travel / Poland in photo riddles - part 3 [818]


Plants.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Yes, female narcissism and self-preservation is very real and white women went along with absolute zeal with any agenda rolled out to compete with, attack and tear down white men.

Never mind white women already held positions of comfort and deference in society for generations.

They demanded more and they got it.

Look at any affirmative action program in any Western country and it has been white women who have been the greatest beneficiaries each and every time.

White female privilege has been criticized over the years in some leftwing media outlets but this is yet to get any traction in government and businesses.

But it is white women who decided to commit demographic suicide in order to have "amazing careers" for themselves.

Time is against though and they too face demographic replacement. They have just been too self-centered and too stupid for it to dawn on them yet. Transwomen competing in sports and using female only spaces have been the only areas of encroachment they have complained about because it is in their faces. They lack foresight and don't have the intelligence anyway to understand that becoming a demographic minority is going to knock them off their high horse permanently.


Absolutely. They thought sipping increased their chances of getting laid or starting a family never realizing women see such behavior as weakness. Indeed, they backstabbed other men and the birthrates never improved.


You have daddy issues and are not the average. Many fathers have parented and wanted to. Feminists fought against this and the courts sided with the women. Now study after study shows the many benefits of having fathers in the lives of children; both for the family and society.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]

Typical feminist answer. You only want rights and no responsibilities. No different than a child. Indeed, how can the West expect to have actual children when their hands are full dealing with women like you?

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


Is that still a sex-tourism hotspot for old frustrated Polish women who take advantage of desperate younger males looking to get into Europe through a sham marriage?


Co-parenting in Muslim countries is done with the husband who works as well as extended family. You know, the sort of arrangement that used to be done in Poland before communism and feminism.


Right and women have responsibilities in this matter rather than holding society to ransom.

Women who complain enough is never done for them to have children never say that once they get what they want they guarantee to have three or more children in exchange. Never.


It's feminist like yourself who are fine with the importation of the third worlders. Feminist won't complain until the third worlders begin to be given preferential treatment at the expense of feminists.

Love / Smitten and Wondering [81]

The wife is jealous and doesn't stop for a second to think how she has failed her husband.

Also, if the wife is a true feminist who believes in the legitimacy and advocacy of polyamory (in other people's lives obviously) she is enraged that her husband didn't seek her consent first to have an open relationship just so she could tell him no.

Life / Poland's birthrate on the decline [480]


An admission that selfish Western women want everything done for them.

Why should government and corporations be burdened with co-parenting?