News / Is NORD STREAM dangerous for Poland's natural enviroment? [540]

Because again, this pipeline undermines Poland's status as a transit country, costing Poland potential transit fees.

Hungary is happy for the same reason, because it now suddenly became a transit country.

News / Is NORD STREAM dangerous for Poland's natural enviroment? [540]

Crow, are you really that stupid? That pipe line is an attempt of Russia to diversify its' pipe line network and make it less relient on transit countries like Poland and the Ukraine. Thus you won't find anyone in Poland who'd be happy about this.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


They are in Germany illegally, or specifically the crossed the border illegally. Every refugee who crossed the border on foot usually signs a waver acknowledging this before they apply for asylum. But the right for asylum trumps any possible border violation, just as no hospital can turn you away because you parked in front of a fire hydrant.

Life / Vandalism in Poland: Has it always been this way? [80]


Just another proof how deeply irrational homophobia is.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


I just did that several times now. Merkel had the choice between two options, and she chose the one that would be less harmful to Germamy's interests in the long run.


It was a good decision given the circumstances and one can proudly look back to in the future.


Very true, everybody not in Southern Europe was willing to ignore the issue for years, until it came knocking in 2015. Merkel was briefed by the German secret service in 2015 that the refugees might upset the fragile peace in the Balkans. Not exactly something many would like to risk.


That is more or less what is being done with the new arrivals now.


Your ignorance is truly staggering. If you close the border for refugees you will need controls which of course will also heavily affect the traffic with goods. This scenario has been discussed a few times at the Brenner pass at the border between Austria and Italy, the costs would have been in the billions for each month.

themeditelegraph.com/en/transport/road-rail-air-transport/2016/04/12/news/closing-the-brenner-pass-costs-140-billion-1.38162554

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


Nobody in Germany in a leading position said this as justification as to why Germany did not close the borders in 2015. If anything this was said as to why Germany might be able to integrate the refugees into the work force - which as the link showed turned out to be true. Merkel always justified her decision as necessary for stabilizing Southern Europe and preserving freedom of movement and the EU.


Another quote never said by Merkel and others in the context that is often implied. It is a fact that most refugees, particulary from Syria, are above avarage qualified, with a particulary high amount of doctors among them (again relative to their country) but compared to European societies those are rather low. During the Covid crises, quite a few German hospitals were glad to have qualified people from Syria though.


Young men are refugees like any other people too, particulary in Civil Wars like Syria.


Sarrazin helped pointing out some of the problems with Germany's integration system, particulary the difficulties for refugees from non-European countries to integrate. It his partly thanks to him that many reforms had been made, including language courses from day one and less restrictions on finding work. By the 2nd book however he went off the deep end, and started spouting a lot of racist antisemitic stuff.


A right-wing conspiracy nut-job who used to be a reapected journalist, but who eventually only published in the German Kopp Verlag (the one for Hitler apologists and alien believers).


A mistake implies that there was a better option available. Merkel had to choose in 2015 between

A) Close the borders, disrupting trade and causing economic harm to Germany and risking the destabilization of Southern Europe and the Balkans, with the EU's future in question

or B) letting the refugees in, knowing that Germany was capable of dealing with the refugees (and as a Bonus, staying true to her Christian conscious as a parish daughter).

B was in every way the better option. Humanitarian issues aside, preserving the EU is Germany's vital interest.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


Yes it is. Those have had a lot of desire, considering the difficulties of finding work despite not knowing the language or having sufficient qualifications, which also means that those who so far failed must not have necessary lacked desire to find work. But it is good to know that you have changed your views on refugees for the better.


It would have been a mistake if Germany's motivation for accepting refugees in 2015 had been economic in nature, which you apparantly believe, but that was never the case. Germany decided to not close the borders in an effort to prevent the refugee crisis from destabilizing Southern Europe and the Balkans, which would have happened if the refugees already stranded in Italy or the Balkans had been confined there. Merkel has since 2009 tirelessly worked to keep the EU afloat and 2015 was but one of the many measures taken by her. Yeah, taking the refugees was costly - but humanitarian reasons aside - watching Southern Europe collapse under the strain with a possible end to the freedom of movement or an end to the EU would have been much, much worse.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]

Rich really likes to ask stupid questions.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


Indeed, that is a pretty good result given the challenges. But what interests me more, will you now stop claiming that most of them have no desire to work?


No worries, we will share them with you in time ;)

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


Skill maybe, but most of them desire work and had been increasingly succesful in doing so until the Pandemie hit.

google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/germany-half-of-refugees-find-jobs-within-five-years/a-52251414


No, just register their names and finger prints in an international data bank to make sure that they can not apply for asylum elsewhere and there won't be any issues with that.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


A perfect self-description.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [996]


The Taliban will be very surprised to here this.

History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

The idea that 4m people were murdered in Auschwitz had been put into question by Western historians in the early 1960s and debunked by the 1970s. It was the communist government who insisted on the number because they wanted to keep Auschwitz as the symbol of the Holocaust. The scale of the Holocaust was however never affected by this, since the number of victims of at leaat more than 5m is well supported by evidence. They were just not all murdered in KZs, but also decentrally by SS, Wehrmacht, Einsatzgruppen and so on.

On how the Nazis identified Jews:

aboutholocaust.org/en/facts/how-did-the-germans-know-who-was-jewish

History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]


Yeah, because you were not born in Europe in the early 20th century.

History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]


You mean aside from Königsberg and the billions taken from the GDR as reparation?


But nowhere the extent you seem to believe


They usually checked birth certificates but if there was no documentation, particulary in Eastern Europe, they were likely to just kill anyone remotely suspected.

History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]


Whoever was deemed as Jewish by the Nazis.


This is actually a good example on how that does not work. Oil companies tried their best to bury the evidence, financing studies that tried to seed doubts but now global warming is accepted as a fact by the scientific community.

Holocaust denial is an exercise in futility. Because there is simply no denying the many written sources that describe it. Which is why no Holocaust denier has ever attempted this, since they know there is no good explanation as to how this could have been faked. We are talking about millions of documents, spread in various archives across all of Europe.

Letters from German soldiers to their families in which they allude to having seen mass killings in the woods. Private diaries in which they go into more details. Official division diaries in which the commander notes how they rounded up families which were suspected of being Jewish and executed them in the woods. Official letters to local authorities, telling them that the "evacuated" Jews to the Eastern Territories had perished. And so on.

History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]


Their is no respectable historian who would put the number below 5m victims, there is too many written evidence backing it up. Whether or not 5.5m or 6.5m were killed is up to debate, but the scale of the Holocaust does not really change either way.


Nonsense. There are few historical topics that have attracted so much attention from scholars like the Holocaust.

History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

There are hundreds of thousands of documents spread across Europe telling the stories of the Holocaust. Do you think those are all falsified?

Also to answer any possible claim made by Holocaust deniers:

hdot.org/debunking-denial/

News / The Witcher 3 game - Poland's great success [37]

I am already very much looking forward to Cyberpunk 2077.

News / Years of Poland in the EU - assessment of pros and cons [1199]

You mean someone who turns his country into a autocracy and who abused public funds to enrich himself and his family?


It is the EU that invests.

News / Years of Poland in the EU - assessment of pros and cons [1199]

Being democratically elected does not mean you are democratic.

News / Years of Poland in the EU - assessment of pros and cons [1199]

Obviously PiS in this scenario.

News / Years of Poland in the EU - assessment of pros and cons [1199]

Nope, this time we won't leave them to their opressors unlike 1953, 1956 and 1968.

News / Years of Poland in the EU - assessment of pros and cons [1199]

1. Its a constitution nevertheless and a pretty good one which is why we kept it after 1990. Besides Grundgesetz and Constitution have the same meaning. Yeah it was originally hoped that it would only be temporary, but its' authors knew that it could last a long time and thus made sure it was designed as a lon-term solution. Hell, the American founding fathers expected their constitution to last a generation but it is still holding up (though it is showing its' age).

2. There is no need for a popular vote since it was drafted by democratic legitimated politicians. In fact most democratic constitutions have never been submitted to a popular vote.

News / Years of Poland in the EU - assessment of pros and cons [1199]

Spike, you are really embarrasing yourself here to anyone who has even a modicum of knowledge on the subject.

1. Germany has of course a constitution (in fact Polish lawywrs and other Eastern European countries looked into it before they wrote their own).

2. The criticism against lay judges is just an outlier and one that is not widely shared by experts. The high hurdles to become one are of course intentionsl since you don't want anybody to decide the fate of someone.

It worst it awards undue influence to local authorities with no influence on the bigger picture . Whereas the Polish justice reform is de facto a power grab by the Polish government with serious implications for the rule of law. But don't worry, the EU will help protect Poland's democracy!

News / New European Council's report: "Poland oasis of racism, xenophobia and homophobia" ... [343]


The internet is full of articles describing such events.


Sadly, they are not telling the truth here, or at least not the whole picture. Yeah, those LBGTQ-free zones are not expelling those minorities, but they are doing their best to create and maintain an hostile atmosphere against them with the hope that they leave on their own. The framing itself calling it "LBGT-ideology" instead of the simple wish for equality speaks volumes.

News / New European Council's report: "Poland oasis of racism, xenophobia and homophobia" ... [343]


Whenever you have a gay pride parade in Poland, you have violent protesters trying to attack them with only the police holding them back.


That is textbook discrimination, particulary the latter one. There is no good reason why two gay people should not be able to raise a child as good as a hetero couple, or a even a single parten.


That is not "teaching gayism". It is just educating children that LBGTQ is a perfectly normal orientation and no foundation for discrimination as it should be.

News / New European Council's report: "Poland oasis of racism, xenophobia and homophobia" ... [343]

Well, two Poles recently killed a German in Berlin because he was gay.

News / New European Council's report: "Poland oasis of racism, xenophobia and homophobia" ... [343]

Well, that is the difference. In Germany you have a few isolated villages. In Poland you have 1/3 of the country proudly displaying homophobia.

History / Do Polish people in general dislike Russia or Germany more? [369]

Not sure if I agree with the article. No doubt the series helped illustrating the horros of the Holocaust, but the engagement with the past had already started in the early 1960s with several high-profile trials. This statue of limitation for murder was also for the first time prolonged for 15 years in 1965 because of this (and then abolished in 1979). The protests in 1968 was also partly motivated by the shock over the crimes of the previous generation that had come into the open.