Where the fvck is that British freedom of speech law?
The Two Saddest Nations on Earth... Poles and Jews
How did the newspapers where the shameful incident happened report it?
That's how...
Hollywood LOSES THEIR MINDS After Richard Dreyfuss Said This...
Your gulag press had access to what D said. Yet, they decided not to quote him....only his critics...
In the US, every citizen is a reporter and protected by the First Amendment. Not you, gulag inmates.
In your gulag, aka the UK, a woman was charged and found guilty for posting a rap song composed and performed by another guy.
A guy was charged and found guilty for posting his views about LGBTs.
The one who edited the above video had more integrity than all the UK garbage press combined...He actually played what Dreyfuss said!
Where the fvck is that British freedom of speech law?
Hollywood LOSES THEIR MINDS After Richard Dreyfuss Said This...
Your gulag press had access to what D said. Yet, they decided not to quote him....only his critics...
In the US, every citizen is a reporter and protected by the First Amendment. Not you, gulag inmates.
In your gulag, aka the UK, a woman was charged and found guilty for posting a rap song composed and performed by another guy.
A guy was charged and found guilty for posting his views about LGBTs.
The one who edited the above video had more integrity than all the UK garbage press combined...He actually played what Dreyfuss said!
Where the fvck is that British freedom of speech law?
Hollywood LOSES THEIR MINDS After Richard Dreyfuss Said This...
So that's a no.
How about actual newspapers not YouTube crap?
What did the NYT and NYP report?
What??? The ...are you on about? Who showed scorn towards the whole world, who for centuries focused on itself and only itself, who makes Hollywood movies about itself and only itself? Who comes from a nation that is the most closed within itself and separates itself from others and diregards other people as equal to itself?
Answer: A Jew
Answer: A Jew
So that's a no.
So it's a yes, bootlicker...Quoting Fox News:
foxnews.com/media/richard-dreyfuss-upsets-fans-gender-comments-jaws-event
Richard Dreyfuss upsets fans with gender comments at 'Jaws' event
Down below:
In a video posted to YouTube, the actor can be seen walking onto the stage wearing a dress over his clothes and dancing to a Taylor Swift song.
"a video posted to YouTube" is a link to this video where free citizens like me, as opposed bootlicking subjects like you, can hear what Mr. D actually said.
And the readers' comments from free and unafraid citizens:
Good for Richard Dreyfuss! He quickly sized up the fact that he was talking to a bunch of wild-eyed Democrats and thus decided to have some fun by making fun of their twisted values. It worked. Thanks Richard for ringing their bells!
"10 year olds shouldn't be allowed to get gender changing surgery". How can any real parent disagree with Dreyfuss? If you vote for Any Democrat in November, you're supporting this Agenda
The theater would not have apologized if a leftie made opposite remarks. They would have praised them.
That's the top 3 ...the next 6 are just like these 3...
From New York Post:
Richard Dreyfuss' son reacts to his alleged sexist, homophobic rant at 'Jaws' screening
At least they used "alleged" but still not what he said. Same garbage as DM. Leftists or scared rightists are all the same.
Comments:
And we still have no idea what he supposedly said.
Would love to see the text of what Richard Dreyfuss said or see some video clips.
Now the summary:
The real difference is not between woke leftist scum in the UK and the US. The difference is between our reactions to these mother fvckers.
We, Americans, despise them and say so publicly. You, gulag bootlickers, adore yours, never criticize them, and always defend them.
Where the fvck is that British freedom of speech law?
still not what he said
Of course not.
None of them do...
So much for your free speech fantasies...
How about actual newspapers not YouTube crap?
I asked the same thing in my post # 202 but strangely enough he didn't reply........
link to this video where free citizens like me, as opposed bootlicking subjects like you, can hear what Mr. D actually said.
In my post 202 I said to you that the Daily Fail had linked to a video clip:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13466099/Jaws-star-Richard-Dreyfuss-DRESS-delivering-sexist-homophobic-speech.html
Actually, there are 2 video clips in the article so that blows your lack of British freedom of speech out the window.
So much for your free speech fantasies...
Fox did because they are not woke leftists like you and your Soviet BBC.
You are deflecting. Free speech is tested when it involves ordinary people, not billion-dollar corporations. Nobody went to prison for posting offensive views in the US.
You, gulag bootlickers, are scared because 3000 of you end up convicted every year for posting offensive opinions about protected groups. BTW, in Russia only 200.
In your gulag, aka the UK, a woman was charged and found guilty for posting a rap song composed and performed by another guy.
A guy was charged and found guilty for posting his views about LGBTs.
Duh!
In my post 202 I said to you that the Daily Fail had linked to a video clip:
There is no such outlet. Go play those stupid games with that moron, Cymes...
Freedom of speech is measured in the number of people arrested for posting "offensive" opinions on the Internet:
Per year:
UK - 3300
Russia - 400
US - 0
There is no such outlet.
It is what the Brits call the Daily Mail, but hey! Try and distract from the British source that I linked to earlier.
Here it is again for you:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13466099/Jaws-star-Richard-Dreyfuss-DRESS-delivering-sexist-homophobic-speech.html
But of course you'll hardly ever admit that you're wrong.........
your Soviet BBC.
It's generally rather conservative but don't let the truth stand in your way.
But of course you'll hardly ever admit that you're wrong.........
He'd actually spontaneously combust.
But of course you'll hardly ever admit that you're wrong.........
I do when I am wrong. They didn't have those videos in the first version. I am not blind.
Besides, posting another man's video is hardly an act of bravery. Posting your own is in the gulag aka the UK.
Freedom of speech is measured in the number of people arrested for posting "offensive" opinions on the Internet:
Per year:
UK - 3300
Russia - 400
US - 0
In your gulag, offending X is not even necessary to get arrested. A mere possibility that someone out there MIGHT get offended is enough. That's how sick your gulag is.
Duh!
In your gulag, offending X is not even necessary to get arrested. A mere possibility that someone out there MIGHT get offended is enough. That's how sick your gulag is.
OMG! you are so biased and misinformed that I can only assume that you are accessing extreme right wing American views on the internet.
Look at how the UK deal with protests and demonstrations and then compare it to the American way.
I admit that I prefer the American way, but which one has the greater freedom of speech?
Think before you answer.
and misinformed
How many times do I have to ask for information about your freedom of speech laws? I think I already did 10.
protests and demonstrations
Anarchy is not freedom of speech. On my island, street blockers would never do it again.
US:
Hate speech is protected by the First Amendment.
UK gulag:
Current law provides for many exceptions to free speech. They include threatening or abusive words or behaviour intending or likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress or cause a breach of the peace,[4][5][6] sending another any article which is indecent or grossly offensive with an intent to cause distress or anxiety,[7][8][9] incitement,[10] incitement to racial hatred,[11] incitement to religious hatred, incitement to terrorism including encouragement of terrorism and dissemination of terrorist publications,[10][12][13] glorifying terrorism,[14][15] collection or possession of a document or record containing information likely to be of use to a terrorist,[16][17] treason,[18][19][20][21][22] sedition,[19] obscenity,[23] indecency including corruption of public morals and outraging public decency,[24] defamation,[25] prior restraint, restrictions on court reporting including names of victims and evidence and prejudicing or interfering with court proceedings,[26][27] prohibition of post-trial interviews with jurors,[27] time, manner, and place restrictions,[28] harassment, privileged communications, trade secrets, classified material, copyright, patents, military conduct, and limitations on commercial speech such as advertising.
Germany:
Offences contrary to ยง 130 of the Criminal Code committed abroad, whether by German nationals or foreigners, can be pursued as a domestic crime when they so act as if they had been committed within the country, affecting the public peace in Germany and violating the human dignity of German citizens.
What is human dignity to be decided by Neo Gestapo...
Hate speech is protected by the First Amendment.
UK gulag:
Current law provides for many exceptions to free speech. They include threatening or abusive words or behaviour intending or likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress or cause a breach of the peace,[4][5][6] sending another any article which is indecent or grossly offensive with an intent to cause distress or anxiety,[7][8][9] incitement,[10] incitement to racial hatred,[11] incitement to religious hatred, incitement to terrorism including encouragement of terrorism and dissemination of terrorist publications,[10][12][13] glorifying terrorism,[14][15] collection or possession of a document or record containing information likely to be of use to a terrorist,[16][17] treason,[18][19][20][21][22] sedition,[19] obscenity,[23] indecency including corruption of public morals and outraging public decency,[24] defamation,[25] prior restraint, restrictions on court reporting including names of victims and evidence and prejudicing or interfering with court proceedings,[26][27] prohibition of post-trial interviews with jurors,[27] time, manner, and place restrictions,[28] harassment, privileged communications, trade secrets, classified material, copyright, patents, military conduct, and limitations on commercial speech such as advertising.
Germany:
Offences contrary to ยง 130 of the Criminal Code committed abroad, whether by German nationals or foreigners, can be pursued as a domestic crime when they so act as if they had been committed within the country, affecting the public peace in Germany and violating the human dignity of German citizens.
What is human dignity to be decided by Neo Gestapo...
Europe's hate toward free speech is not trivial. This cancer has already invaded US universities and is spreading down to Main Street and our homes. It manifests itself as the generational gap that is getting wider by the year.
You send a normal kid to college and in four years she comes back as a raving lunatic leftist.
You send a normal kid to college and in four years she comes back as a raving lunatic leftist.
in four years she comes back
Usually they don't come back, they just go their own way through life.
They didn't have those videos in the first version. I am not blind.
You do realise that the DM link you posted originally is not the same one that I posted in #202?
This is what you posted:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13463937/Theater-apologizes-patrons-following-controversial-appearance-Oscar-winner-Richard-Dreyfuss-12-months-said-Academys-DEI-rules-want-vomit.html
This is what I posted which includes the 2 videos:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13466099/Jaws-star-Richard-Dreyfuss-DRESS-delivering-sexist-homophobic-speech.html
I do when I am wrong.
You should be apologising now then as my British source includes footage of what was said.
Freedom of speech is measured in the number of people arrested for posting "offensive" opinions on the Internet:
Per year:
UK - 3300
Russia - 400
US - 0
Try to explain THAT.
Per year:
UK - 3300
Russia - 400
US - 0
Try to explain THAT.
US - 0
A poster here has been arrested at least twice for online hate. He lives in Illinois.
johnny reb 48 | 7751
29 May 2024 #232
Any sources or names jon or is this another of your made-up convenient lies to diminish ?
In the US, hate speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Nice speech goes unprotected.
Nice speech goes unprotected.
names
MYOB
hate speech is protected
Why 'protect' hate speech?
johnny reb 48 | 7751
29 May 2024 #235
MYOB
Why, you make up lies about me too.
Then you call your pet lacky and have him chime in so I afford the same privilege.
It's called leveling playing field even if you do own this forum.
Why 'protect' hate speech?
Hate speech is a Woke term that is used by Liberals to shame the truth.
Yeah, right...
Only a moron or a British subject could ask such an insane question. Maybe JR has the patience to deal with it...
I don't beyond this...
Why does anyone need free speech laws? Obedient bootlickers don't need any such thing. Or guns...The King goons will speak for you and will protect you 24/7.
Oops...I was wrong...They will disarm you and let you deal with your security on your own...Especially when migrant hordes are involved...If you shoot one of those sobs before he rapes your wife, he goes free because he didn't know that rape was a felony and you go to prison for life.
I don't beyond this...
Why does anyone need free speech laws? Obedient bootlickers don't need any such thing. Or guns...The King goons will speak for you and will protect you 24/7.
Oops...I was wrong...They will disarm you and let you deal with your security on your own...Especially when migrant hordes are involved...If you shoot one of those sobs before he rapes your wife, he goes free because he didn't know that rape was a felony and you go to prison for life.
What a sick rant
johnny reb 48 | 7751
29 May 2024 #239
I thought it was spot on
What a sick rant
A lot healthier than fvcking another guy's ass...
BTW, would you be kind enough to highlight the keyword that made my post "sick"?