The Two Saddest Nations on Earth... Poles and Jews

People should be careful what they wish for. Aliens could be gruesome looking things with recipe books for pierogi z Polakami.


You've never been. Yet you mention it 10 times daily...

Isreal may be a good illustration of the adage or rather to quote Nietzsche:

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster.

I am old but not stupid. In your UK shilhole, I would already be in prison for hurting someone's feelings. Like this:

I hate Muslims.
I hate migrants.
I hate LGBT freaks.
I hate NATO.
I hate Brits.
I love Russia.

OK, jon, can you post the above in your British gulag and not be arrested?

I see some disturbances in the emotional sphere here.

Who said that what I wrote is true?

But it sure would have me charged criminally in Germany and in the UK. Especially this:

I love NAZIs and Hitler.
Hitler was a great German patriot.
Hitler would know how to deport Muslim migrants.

Tell me that you could post this today and not have your Gestapo arrest you tomorrow.

I can here, in the country of the First Amendment. In fact, I just did.

Just curious...How many exceptions did your ruling mob manage to smuggle into your "freedom of speech" lie?

Not correct.

It would in Germany, but in the UK you would have to be proven to be inciting violence.

That is a completely different "Kettle of Fish"!

That is complete and utter bollox! And you know it.The UK currently has more freedom of speech than the USA, just watch how our two different countries deal with demo's.....

No. In the UK, anxiety is enough. In the Soviet Union, you would have to be acting against communism to be in trouble. A causing B anxiety was never a problem. I know. I lived there.

In your Orwellian hell it is. Go to Post #180, fast forward to 5:15, and watch the video for a minute or so.


No, you don't. In the UK, for my posts, I would be in prison by now.

Dealing with lawbreakers is outside of free speech. Those who block traffic should be given 1 minute to clear out and beaten into a bloody mess if they don't because their freedom of speech ends where my right of free movement begins. If that block causes the death of a person in an ambulance, they should be charged with the second degree murder.

Do you want to compare our First Amendment with your freedom of speech laws? Here it is:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Nothing about feelings and anxieties. No howevers, umlesses, and other weasel words...

Considerably more.

How much more? Show me the UK version of the First Amendment.

Far much more. The freedom of kids to go to school without having 'active shooter drills'.

You will have to wait until hell freezes over Novi.


knife attack drills.

We don't need them since your son is fortunately thousands of miles away and in any case ineligible to enter the U.K.

A shooting B has exactly zero to do with freedom of speech or "democracy". By that standard, North Korea is a model to follow.
As JR said...you are really stupid.

I found it!

Quoting:

British subjects are allowed to say any damn thing they want as long as the parasites at the Ministry of Good Manners do not object.

Don't you like democracy y?

And freedom from risking being shot is pretty important.


A weird comparison, considering the number of their citizens that they kill. Not great at making arguments, are you?


Yes you are, and insane too.

How many school mass shootings did NK have last year? The answer is zero!


Are there any words in the above sentence you don't comprehend?

Hey, subject, how posting your version of the First Amendment?

How many judicial murders did it have?

Your country, Poland, is far safer and far freer than the country you're an immigrant in.

Pretty well anywhere in Europe is more free than there.

My country is the US. That is where my family is and that is where I pay taxes to protect you parasitic asses.

I self-identify as an American, not a Pole. The US is the only country I am 100% loyal to.

English is my primary language. I speak only English with my Polish-born wife. My kids don't speak a word in Polish.

What about your wife? What language do you speak?

About that First Amendment...Can you post the British Freedom of Speech Act?

This is how sad the UK has become. A major news outlet is scared to quote what somebody said because the Ministry of Appovved Opinions and its goons may not like it.

Quoting Daily Mail:

Richard Dreyfuss sparks outrage at Jaws screening as movie theater apologizes for his 'sexist and homophobic' remarks

So what did that sob say, I wondered when I read the title above...Let's see....Nowhere to be found. Apologies, shock, and condemnations ... plenty of those...and this admission that journalistic integrity is now a concept only hateful right-winger adhere to:

It's unclear exactly what the actor said, but some of those present say he made 'sexist, homophobic' remarks.

Bullshit! You know exactly what the man said. You won't quote it because that dump you are in DOES NOT HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!! Duh!

That's how the brave Brits that want to go to war with Russia are fcking scared of their own Thought Gestapo.

If you want to see this shlt for yourself, here is the link:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13463937/Theater-apologizes-patrons-following-controversial-appearance-Oscar-winner-Richard-Dreyfuss-12-months-said-Academys-DEI-rules-want-vomit.html

What a stupid rant.

Nobody cares what a particularly trashy tabloid read by the uneducated elderly says or doesn't say, however if they say something's unclear that not is probably unclear.

After all, it's full of smut and bike from the front page to the back page.

Where are the reports of what was said in the US media? This did take place in a US movie theatre after all and it was this venue that apologised for what he said. So much for freedom of speech. I don't get why you think the British press would be that interested in an aged American actor making insulting remarks in an American theatre? Slow news week?

You didn't look too hard either. I found a 6 minute video clip courtesy of the Daily Fail. It was very hard to hear what he was saying to be honest.

What a stupid post...

DM reported everything condemning the actor for saying bad things ... in front of witnesses. Somehow, DM failed to get from them what the man said.

Bullshlt! DM didn't report what he said DELIBERATELY because it would be "offensive" or because quoting those offensive words would get DM in trouble.

Let's face it...the UK is a Euro gulag where 3000 people get arrested every year for posting "offensive" stuff on the Internet.

FYI, azholes, the First Amendment is meant to protect offensive speech...Nice speech does not need protection. Duh!

The Stockholm syndrome at its worst...Defending the ruling mob and that powerless idiot king with bad teeth...just to feel like a subject...

Yes, you are.

You are an absolute pill.

The exact words were not known, hence not reported in your trashy tabloid.

Would you rather they made something up??

Then you say:

According to the witnesses, Mr X, allegedly said "....."

Got it, stupid, or are you trying to tire me out ....

Hey, where the fvck is that British freedom of speech law?

You don't.

You report facts not hearsay if you have lawyers that are any good.


Did you think there was such a thing as a British legal system???

Stick to things you know about like delinquent daughters.

You are trying to outlast me again...

No, moron...So-called MSM routinely start with "Sources claim that..." Duh!

Where the fvck is that British freedom of speech thingy? You, bootlickers, ain't got any...You can wiggle your azz all you want...

I already produced mine...

Most people reading this will outlast you by several decades.


No, moron, tabloids have lawyers and have to check their "someone said" stories carefully.

What did other newspapers, perhaps ones in the country it happened, report?

Does this one clam much?
usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2024/05/27/richard-dreyfuss-jaws-screening-rant-the-cabot/73872215007/

And if they can't, they keep quiet.

DM is actually better that MSM because DM allows readers' comments. Real MSM garbage like AP and Reuters does not. So, in that sense, DM is "democratic" because it allows opinions that are contrary to the DM editors'. I know because I posted many of mine.

Now...

Where the fvck is that British freedom of speech law?

The Daily Mail is certainly 'MSM' personified.

As lowbrow mass market newspapers go, it's about as mainstream as it gets.

How was the scandal reported in the country where it happened?