Men who think this way get burned by the legal system.
Agreed, so you should stop being 'macho'. It never wins in court and besides, women find it stupid.
No, but men should be smart men not like the ones who fear having recourse to legal protections, especially in our society which nourishes cries of false abuse and yes, even false charges of rape.
It's liberalism that has infected our courts with anti-male bias and (it) keeps men second class citizens when it comes to justisce for men.
Analyse of your posting is quite interesting... :)
You concentrate fully on a legal system and courts and this is very wrong attitude. (state is interested only to collect your money ) You think that this is smart to win a case in a court? I think that same fact that such case is already in court is a disaster. The point is to handle the relationship and this is smart! When a men is abused by women this is because he does allow her to behave like that. Women might be far from perfection but she don't have natural ability to succeed in this field. Neither interest to become a lonely mother for example.
You are a dinosaur in your thinking and there are women in this forum who hate what I say yet understand the truth of it.
You see, this is
confrontation rhetoric, you are obsessed by this issue. Instead to calm down the emotions you go the opposite way and this is your mistake.
I probably have more contact with women in one week than you have in several months, and there's a reason for it.
I don't know you, perhaps this is true. However this is you the one who appears to have serious problems and this is you who seems to cannot handle the situation.Your supposed experience lead you to this confrontation rhetoric that you use in this thread.
It's liberalism that has infected our courts with anti-male bias and (it) keeps men second class citizens when it comes to justisce for men.
As I have wrote before. I see that mad political correctness reached to courts but this is separate problem.
Beside of that this is bad American custom to say "liberalism" instead of "leftism". The first is freedom minded ideology, while the second preach for the oppression of the state.
The classical definition is that "liberalism is a broad class of political philosophies that considers individual liberty and equality to be the most important political goals".
Absolutely not. You can have either liberty or equality. Equality is a goal of egalitarianism, and this is in fact a totalitarian (anti-liberal) ideology.