The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Home / News  % width   posts: 99

Nukes and Poland's Neutrality


Novichok  4 | 8785
23 Mar 2025   #61
This thread is about Poland and Nukes,

There is no such thing as Poland and Nukes - just as there is no Poland and ICBMs, Poland and aircraft carriers, or Poland and supersonic fighter jets.

There is Poland and a bunch of morons on drugs who hallucinate about nukes. That I grant you...
PolAmKrakow  2 | 872
23 Mar 2025   #62
More military, more nukes. Sounds a lot like Eisenhower and Krhushchev.

Poland needs a strong independent military. The EU was never meant to be one governing body that was taking over the soveriegn rights of member countries. EU law and direction should never over rule Polands laws or the direction the country wants to take. The idea of nukes in Poland at this time in history is not going to fly. Too many road blocks. If nukes were ever used in Europe, other than tactical ones, the fallout would spread across Europe. Russia doesnt want to use a big nuke unless its in a MAD scenario with the US. Putin didnt use a nuke in Ukraine these three years, the thinking that he might in the future in Europe doesnt match what we have all watched play out in Ukraine. Useless, nonsensical, and would not scare Russia at all.
OP Torq  10 | 1132
23 Mar 2025   #63
would not scare Russia at all

That's where you're wrong. There are not many things that Russia's afraid of but Poles with nukes is definitely one of them.

One way or another, we are not going to ask for anybody's permission. We are getting nuclear weapons and that's final. We wouldn't have to do it if America was still a credible ally. Unfortunately, they're not.
Novichok  4 | 8785
23 Mar 2025   #64
Poles with nukes is definitely one of them.

Russia would simply organize a revolution in Poland - just as the US organized one in Kiev in 2014. Problem solved.

If I were Putin, I would drop those Polish nukes on the Euro countries that helped Poland to get them. Another problem solved...
OP Torq  10 | 1132
23 Mar 2025   #65
Russia would simply organize a revolution in Poland - just as the US organized one in Kiev in 2014.

You're not thinking clearly.

It was easy for the US to organize the revolution in Kiev because millions of Ukrainians wanted to be a part of the West. Where would you find millions of Poles to organize a revolution to be a part of Russkiy Mir?
Novichok  4 | 8785
23 Mar 2025   #66
Unfortunately, they're not.

Fortunaly, we are not. Find another sucker...

By now, it should be clear to all parasites in Europe that no third-world nothing country like Poland or the UK will ever drag the US into a war with Russia.

The single greatest outcome of Trump-Putin talks would be an agreement to never, ever be at war - no matter what...with the red line clearly drawn between the two areas of interest, if not control.
Ironside  51 | 13078
23 Mar 2025   #67
Where would you find millions of Poles to organize a revolution to be a part of Russkiy Mir?

Evidently in the US. Are they Poles, I think not.
Novichok  4 | 8785
23 Mar 2025   #68
Where would you find millions of Poles to organize a revolution to be a part of Russkiy Mir?

Revolutions don't need millions. See the Bolshevik one. Less than 10% - and, viola - we have the USSR!

Well organized 5% is plenty. Not the same thing, but in the US, 0.1% of trans freaks intimidated 99% into silence and acceptance. Those who didn't get it were fired, shunned, and canceled.

Including girls and women - the targeted victims of this perversion!!!

Just an example...
OP Torq  10 | 1132
23 Mar 2025   #69
Less than 10%

That's 4 million.

Well organized 5% is plenty.

That's still 2 million Poles wanting to be a part of Russkiy Mir. Good luck finding them.
Novichok  4 | 8785
23 Mar 2025   #70
Good luck finding them.

It depends on the alternatives.

Those Poles who supported the USSR in 1945 did well. Those who didn't, did not do well.

This is commonly known as not being a suicidal moron. Powstancy in Warsaw in 1944 forgot that lesson and caused 200,000 Poles to die.
OP Torq  10 | 1132
23 Mar 2025   #71
It depends on the alternatives.

The situation in which Poland might find herself in the Russkiy Mir would require a set of specific circumstances:

- the US withdrawing completely from Europe (about 25% chance)
- Ukraine losing the war decisively (about 50%)
- Russia managing to gather enough forces to attempt the conquest of Poland (50%)
- Poland failing to get nuclear weapons on time (80%)
- Poland failing to build sufficient conventional forces to make the invasion unprofitable (5%)
- French nuclear umbrella turning out to be a bluff (99%)
- Europe failing to unite sufficiently (50%)
- European NATO/EU countries not coming to Poland's aid (25%)
- even the closest allies (Scandinavia, Germany, Czechia) not joining the war on Poland's side (15%)
- the EU failing to get an extensive trade deal with China (a very important event, in case of likely American-Chinese trade war, and possibly conventional war) (50%)
- the EU failing to come to some sort of agreement with China after the US withdrawal (25%)
- China allowing Russia to go on a rampage in Europe, disrupting their trade and communication lines (10%)

... the joint probability of all these events taking place is about 0,0000006%, so not very likely (to put it mildly).
Novichok  4 | 8785
23 Mar 2025   #72
None of the above would be a subject if Poland had fewer Russia-hating morons and acted less confrontational than the US.

If Trump can talk and smile to Putin, you could try the same. You may even like it.

Just don't start with:

Hey, Vlad, you Russian POS...we hate Russia for Katyn and every single event from the day Christ was born.

If you need help...I am always available.
Miloslaw  24 | 5277
23 Mar 2025   #73
None of the above would be a subject if Poland had fewer Russia-hating morons

Considering Russia's historical attacks on Poland I can't understand why you think that Poles that hate Russians are morons.I just see it as logical.
Please explain your point of view.
Tlum  12 | 295
24 Mar 2025   #74
For your education on "nuclear weapons" (aka glorified dynamites): rumble.com/v6q5s2w-nuclear-weapons-do-not-exist.html

Poland would pay billions for dynamites they can manufacture on their own starting tomorrow?
Novichok  4 | 8785
24 Mar 2025   #75
Please explain your point of view.

It's actually very simple.

There is no upside to telling a neighbor who you believe is a disgusting murderous nut that he is a disgusting murderous nut. Only downside. Act accordingly.

A real life practical example...

If my mother told the Werhmacht officer whom she asked for a travel document to go to Hamburg in late 1944 that she hates Germans for Auschwitz and other war crimes, she would not get that document. Very likely, show would end up at the Gestapo and be shot.

Instead, she thanked him and soon was on the train to Hamburg. While on the train, she smiled and didn't say anything stupid to the border control Germans, either. She was just 25 and had more brains than all the Russia-hating Polish morons here - combined.

Trump came to the same conclusion about Putin. No point in calling him a "tyrant" your stupid press is notorious for.
OP Torq  10 | 1132
24 Mar 2025   #76
No point in calling him a "tyrant" your stupid press is notorious for.

Press writes whatever they want to write - that's the whole concept of free press.

But you're right, we shouldn't be talking too much about Poland's real plans. Or Polish press should do some maskirovka of their own and report self-contradictory things... no, wait a minute... that's exactly what they're doing all the time. xD
Miloslaw  24 | 5277
24 Mar 2025   #77
It's actually very simple.

Yes it is, your explanation is perfect.Bow down to the barbarian to survive...... but what if the barbarian is nowhere near as strong as he thinks he is?
Logic says, take him down!.
Novichok  4 | 8785
25 Mar 2025   #78
Logic says, take him down!.

Go right ahead. London is only 2500 km away from Moscow.

Just don't get us dragged into it...
cms neuf  2 | 1879
25 Mar 2025   #79
Golden Cow's latest idea is that the US will develop some new overpriced fighter, the F-47 (named after himself) but a special worse export version will be made.

Luckily not one grosz of our taxes will be spent on this because of course nobody will buy that POS
Novichok  4 | 8785
25 Mar 2025   #80
I will report you to the FBI. You know more than does Trump.

As a military genius, could please explain why the US should be making artillery and tanks to stay safe.
cms neuf  2 | 1879
25 Mar 2025   #81
Not my business - if you don't like it write to your congressman
Przelotnyptak1  - | 703
25 Mar 2025   #82
I was correct, and you are like an Oracle-no different from the charlatans who predicted the future in ancient Greece or Rome.
Novichok  4 | 8785
25 Mar 2025   #83
Not my business

...but how we name fighter jets is?

I do admit you are not as stupid as your posts. It was a good move not answer why the US makes artillery and tanks because, as stupid as you are, you knew what was coming from me...
Miloslaw  24 | 5277
25 Mar 2025   #84
Go right ahead. London is only 2500 km away from Moscow.

And what? The UK could destroy every major city in Russia in no time at all.

And Russia knows that.

Equally, the USA is just as vulnerable to nuclear attack from Russia as the UK is.

So what is your point?
Novichok  4 | 8785
25 Mar 2025   #85
My point is that Europe is in pro-war hysterics to make itself more important than it is.

Also, that it must sting when the US and Russia talk and make decision while you and other Euro parasites sit in the waiting room to be briefed on what the two adults decided.
Miloslaw  24 | 5277
25 Mar 2025   #86
My point is that Europe is in pro-war hysterics to make itself more important than it is.

I really don't know where you get your ideas from..... probably RT....LOL!!!
Europe is not pro war,as you have said, we have more to fear than you do.

Also, that it must sting when the US and Russia talk

Yes it does, but sting is the wrong word.
Stink is better...... the stench of corruption is very strong.
Novichok  4 | 8785
26 Mar 2025   #87
Europe is not pro war,as you have said, we have more to fear than you do.

If you, Brits, were for peace, you would not send that azzhole Borys Johnson to Zhole to tell him not to sign a peace agreement with Putin.

Z and P were ready to do just that in April 2022. And don't tell me that an old mentally-ill fart made him do it.

the stench of corruption is very strong.

So T and P talking is corruption now? Would a war be better?
OP Torq  10 | 1132
26 Mar 2025   #88
If you, Brits, were for peace

And Americans are for peace? Why do you need your bases all over the world then? Now you only want peace with Russia because you want to concentrate on Pacific, namely China--the poor China (if an average Chinese consumed as much as an average American we would need three additional Earths) who dared to get a bit richer. The funniest thing is that when American greed finally causes nuclear war and the inevitable nuclear winter comes, the northern hemisphere will become uninhabitable and all the Novichoks and other wall-building anti-immigrant retards will have to emigrate to South America and Africa (Australia won't be able to take in everyone) themselves. Hahahahaha - imagine people in Africa saying: "all those Americans can f*ck off back to their frozen sh*thole and stop invading our countries". :D
Novichok  4 | 8785
26 Mar 2025   #89
Good post, Mr. T, but it needs to be broken into smaller pieces. The way it is now, it doesn't read well...

And Americans are for peace?

One more time...There are Americans and then there is that corrupt pile of manure with US MICC on top - looking for another oppo to kill, destroy, and make gobs of money. When they can't find one, they will create it - just as they did in Kiev in 2014, aided by local useful idiots.

Now I will switch sides...In US MICC's defense, when they decide to hit, they hit hard and fast. Unfortunaly, when they are done, DC lawyers take over and turn a quick victory into long-lasting nightmare.

Other than that, I am proud to be part of this great country - warts and all...

Why do you need your bases all over the world then?

To remind all kinds of azzholes who the boss is. Also, for the same reason why cities have many fire stations and police departments.

If the US had bases in Europe in 1938, there would be no WW2 and 50 million people wouldn't have died needlessly. That's why you, morons, need adult supervision.
Ironside  51 | 13078
26 Mar 2025   #90
need adult supervision.

Sunshine you are a missing link in human evolution. don't talk back,
---
And Americans are for peace?

Sure, they are for peace, the so-called Pax Americana. Of course, it is peace on their terms. Why? Because they can! C'est la vie!


Home / News / Nukes and Poland's Neutrality

Please login to post here!