Why Poles are so much different than other slavic nations? Poland must return to mother Poland.

Its really interesting , I have been in many slavic and east europe countries and poles are so much different than the people there like they are so warm if you know you and altough they are a bit cold if they dont know you , they are extremely kind when engaged.

It's the same reason why Syrian are different from Turkish.

well honey , syrians are arabs but turks are not.for example turks in turkey and turks in middle asia are so similar. and what I said was why they are different from other slavs. other slavs are much more like each other.

Give some examples, I am not sure what you are talking about

no, not that different. Specific, yes. All Slavs are specific in their mutual differences and similarities.

Merged: Polish must return to real mother Poland

We must reach deep within our Polish roots and beyond into our Slavic origins and take what is best from it. We should do more searching and analysing of our behaviours in the past and embrace the elements that in the past made Poland a culture that Polish could have been proud of. This is not quite the case now.

Yes, Poles in general are very nice, kind people. Even towards foreigners. Quite unlike the Czechs.

This is only because Czechs think that everyone is laughing at their funny language that functions (sometimes) without vowels.

Really a very beautiful language.


Some.

The Czechs are right. Foreigners, just like LGBTs, are tolerable only if the numbers are low. See London - 35% white Brits.

The rest - foreign-born cancer, slowly devouring once white country...

Poles, along with Czechs, are perhaps the more Westernized among the Slavs!
First off, they're both Roman Catholic, secondly (and most significant), they use
Latin script.

Thirdly, Czechs are smart. Poles are dumb.

66,000 vs 137 deaths during German invasions of Poland and Czechoslovakia.

Again with the useless, nasty stereotyping!

Wrong!53.8% white.

Thats correct Novi.

Stereotyping is always correct because perceptions are developed over time and are based on a large number of cases.

For example....

White IQ is significantly higher than black.
Czechs have a better instinct for self-preservation than do Poles.
German women are uglier than women in Colombia.

And greed is healthy, stereotypes are neat pegs upon which to hang inadequate experience etc. ad nauseum......
Come on, Rich, get a life already!!

White IQ is significantly higher than black.
Czechs have a better instinct for self-preservation than do Poles.
German women are uglier than women in Colombia.

Which of the above is not true?

IQ is a test of acquired skills. It is impacted by given cultures and visual stimulus. It is neither inherent nor connected to DNA.

Hey, Lyzko, are you there?

I'm here? Are YOU all there?

Is there anybody out there?

Indeed there is and I'd already responded to Rich who maintained the stereotype that Poles
are less intelligent than Czechs along with other assorted bilge!

This was especially visible in the example of the good soldier Švejk. Believe me, Czechs are like that.

During the German invasion...

Poles - 66,000 dead
Czechs - 137 dead

So who is a dumb ass?


Alive.

That's no indicator, Rich, and you know it.
Cleverness and intelligence aren't mutually exclusive.
While intelligence is surely a part of cleverness, cleverness
in and of itself is not necessarily the same thing as intelligence!

Example. Someone is intelligent enough to realize that if one
enters a burning building, they too will probably get burned...or worse.
Someone who is clever will estimate which is the strongest section
of the structure and the proceed to either enter from there or simply
stay away.

A clever person might be able to outsmart another person, yet smart and
clever aren't the same thing either in and of themselves.

Second example. A smart person knows how to figure out the answers on
the test. A clever person might be able to figure out exactly what the teacher
wants the student to say/write.

See the difference?

During the German invasion...

Poles - 66,000 dead
Czechs - 137 dead

Which one would you rather be during the German invasion...A Pole or Czech?

I will not read anything beyond the first sentence.

You troll incessantly like a child and expect that by repeating the same moronic question like a robot (or an idiot, take your pick!),
that you will arrive at truth, just like these ******* lawyers who like to badger the witness.

Geez Louise, give it a rest, Rich.

I just ignore him, laugh at him, toy with him and occasionally tell him what a crazy cvnt he is.

He's not worth taking seriously (nobody else does) and his questions are best ignored.

Annoying slippery snakes is my mission and passion.

So, during the German invasions, which one would you rather be...(1) one of the 66,000 Poles or (2) 137 Czechks?

1 or 2, Mr. Weasel?