The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Des Essientes  

Joined: 6 Feb 2010 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - O
Last Post: 10 May 2015
Threads: Total: 7 / Live: 0 / Archived: 7
Posts: Total: 1288 / Live: 386 / Archived: 902

Displayed posts: 386 / page 1 of 13
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Des Essientes   
10 May 2015
History / Good enough for British - Joseph Conrad? Poland-born novelist. [30]

I wonder whether one of his novels has since been censored by the free-speech-suppressing PC dictatorship into "N-word of the Narcissus"?

Conrad's British publisher tried to convince him not to give the novella that title, but he refused to change it. However, in the United States, his publisher refused to use that title, and thus the novella was initially published under a completely different one. Although this was long before the term "politically correct" even existed.

Conrad meant no offense by using the "N-word" in the title. One of Conrad's dear friends from his sailing days was a black man, who continued to visit Conrad and his family after Joseph had become a professional writer, and that is how they referred to him. Conrad seems to have been unaware of the infamy of the word in the United States.
Des Essientes   
5 May 2015
History / Sarmatism in Poland [119]

The title of this merged thread, Turks says that Sarmatism wasn`t Polish but Turkish thing, misrepresents the content of the article it references.

At that time, along with the Poles and Lithuanians, the Commonwealth was also inhabited by Ruthenians, Germans, Jews, Italians, Greeks, and Scots as well as Armenians, Tatars, Hungarians, and Walachians. Each of these nations contributed to the creation of a rich, exotic, multifaceted Polish civilization, known as "Sarmatism."

muftah.org/islams-long-lasting-influence-polish-culture/#.VUjsfpNs1-w

There is absolutely nothing controversial in acknowledging oriental influences on the martial, sartorial, and culinary fashions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth because they are obvious. The reasons that the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth orientalized parts of her culture are numerous. Some of these reasons were pragmatic I.E. Turkish, Tartar and Magyar influenced cavalry tactics won battles, but many cultural appropriations were done out of aesthetic concerns. There is an interesting story behind the adoption of these aesthetic concerns.

Tacitus' Germania, lost since late antiquity and discovered in Hersfeld Abbey in 1425, ascribes the rule of the area, that would later comprise the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, to the Sarmatians. The szlachta wholeheartedly took up the Sarmatian label for themselves. They conjectured that their ancestors must have come from the East, conquered the area, and subsequently adopted the Slavic and Baltic languages of their subjects. They had the example of the Slavic speaking, but originally Turkic, Bulgars for the plausibility of this belief. The szlachta mistakenly believed that the Sarmatians were a Turkic people (they were actually Iranic) and so they began adopting some Turkish styles to celebrate their supposed heredity. Sarmatism allowed the diverse szlachta to believe in a distant common origin for themselves, and to create a style of living unifying them in the present.

Despite, the possibly misleading, title of the article, Islam's Long Lasting Influence Polish Culture, this style had very little to do with the religious precepts of Islam and a lot to do with the aesthetics of certain oriental peoples who had adopted Islam. Another originally oriental people, the Magyars, had at least as much influence on Sarmatism as the Turks and Tartars. The szlachta saw the Hungarian nobility as their closest peers because they had embraced Christianity like themselves.
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

Hey, TheOther, why don't you post on the topic of the thread? Is making stupid claims about "usual suspects" and extending your friendship to condescending Germans really more important?

Hey, Jolly, I asked you if you are ashamed to be hijacking a thread about Polish Jews to make it about ethnic Germans. I ask because Germans murdered three million Polish Jews during WW2. Do you not see how the reader may find this shameful? As for the AK. They fought to liberate Poland from the very same Germans that murdered all those Jews. I am proud of the AK.
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

I am German with a mother born in Poland because people like you are unable to reconcile historic events properly.

Can you explain this claim? Are you in the least bit ashamed to be complaining about the plight of ethnic Germans in a thread asking about the terrible past for Jews in Poland?
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

How many "guts" does it take to be a German, whose government perpetrated the worst genocide in the history of mankind, to lecture Poles on not being culpable enough?
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

Harry now claims he mentioned the Madagascar Plan in conjunction with the Final Solution in order to contrast their vast difference! What an asinine attempt to backpedal! Harry, are you taking lessons from Netanyahu?
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

Here, again, is the post in which Harry implicates Poles in the creation of the Final Solution:

And of course, last but by no means least, the government commission to investigate of possibilities of deporting Polish Jews to Madagascar, the 'Madagascar plan', which the Nazis took up and then turned into the Lublin und Nisko plan before turning to the Final Solution.
That enough for you?

What do you think reader? Am I right? If not, then why does Harry mention the "Madagascar plan" in conjunction with the "final Solution" and why would a plan that was merely investigated, and not implemented, be "by no means the least" part of a terrible past for the Jews in Poland?
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

Harry, I have already quoted the post in which you stupidly use a slippery slope fallacy to implicate Poles in the creation of the "Final Solution". The reader can see this above. Acting like a petulant baby about it won't get you out of the disgusting hole you have dug for yourself. Lie in the mud.
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

Harry, when you use a slippery-slope fallacy to blame Poles for the Holocaust it is blood libel. You brought it up and you should be ashamed of yourself. You have done this in the service of your fetish, the Holocaust. Holocaust fetishism exists and your disgusting post is a clear example of it.
Des Essientes   
9 Apr 2015
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

And of course, last but by no means least, the government commission to investigate of possibilities of deporting Polish Jews to Madagascar, the 'Madagascar plan', which the Nazis took up and then turned into the Lublin und Nisko plan before turning to the Final Solution.
That enough for you?

It is enough to say that using the slippery-slope fallacy to blood libel Poles is a particularly disgusting example of Holocaust fetishism.
Des Essientes   
5 Jan 2015
History / POLAND: EASTERN or CENTRAL European country? [1080]

I was taught in primary school that Poland is in Central Europe and I will stick to that till the day I die

Please understand that "Central Europe" is not a term that is used much in the USA. In accordance with simple binary thinking, Americans divide Europe into East and West. In the USA itself the "Mid-West" is on the Eastern side of the center of the country and "Central-America" is an isthmus far to the South. You really shouldn't believe that Americans are somehow stereotyping Poles as barbaric or impoverished when they call Poland Eastern-European. I understand the inveterate Polish desire not to be lumped in with autocracies like Russia and Belorussia, but you shouldn't assume that Americans see "Eastern" European culture as a monolith even if they are using one term to refer to it geographically. They haven't been educated to discern a distinctly "Central" part of Europe as you have.
Des Essientes   
4 Jan 2015
History / POLAND: EASTERN or CENTRAL European country? [1080]

like 90% of EE are slavic and for common folk in western Europe EE are Slavic

The combined population of Rumania, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is around 36 million. There are estimates that place the total number of Slavs in the world at 350 million people, but that includes Southern-European Slavs and Russians East of the Urals. I wonder what percentage of "Eastern-Europe" is Slavic if one includes the Wends, Czechs, Slovaks and Poles as Eastern-Europeans.

So I guess it boils down to the "economical difference" nowadays.
Europe A (the West) and Europe B (the rest) lol

.if poles were as rich as germans,we would be considered western europeans.

Poland's wealth relative to countries farther West is not the reason many consider Poland part of an "Eastern-Europe". It is the fact that Poles are Slavs and they speak a Satem tongue which speakers of Romance and Germanic languages find exotic.

You really shouldn't have a chip on your shoulders about this. "Eastern-European" is not a derogatory term.
Des Essientes   
30 Dec 2014
History / Origins of Polish Slavs [138]

Here is Jordanes' text in English translation:

Within these rivers lies Dacia, encircled by the lofty Alps as by a crown. Near their left ridge, which inclines toward the north, and beginning at the source of the Vistula, the populous race of the Venethi dwell, occupying a great expanse of land. Though their names now vary amid various clans and places, yet they are chiefly called Sclaweni and Antes.
The abode of the Sclaweni extends from the city of Noviodunum {New Town, modern Isaktscha, Romania} and the lake called Mursianus to the Dniestr, and northward as far as the Vistula. They have swamps and forests for their cities.
The Antes, who are the bravest of these peoples dwelling around the bend of the Black Sea, spread from the Dniestr to the Dniepr, rivers that are many days journey apart.

harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/Goths/Goths1.htm

Yet, ancient chroniclers name people living in Central and Eastern Europe befor 550 AD

Very true, Herodotus writing in the Fifth Century BC mentions several peoples in the area (including a race of seasonal werewolves) and Tacitus wrote of the Venedi at the end of the First Century, but the text above from 550 AD is the oldest one to use the name Sclaweni.

Such an argument is irrelevant. According to many specialists, those names are of Indoeuropean origin.

The names of Polish rivers meaning nothing in Slavic languages is not irrelevant, even if they are of Indo-European origin. Names from different branches of the Indo-European language family would be consistent with the widely accepted theory that posits Indo-Europeans migrating in waves, with the Slavs being the last wave.

If they are so old, we may say they may have been formed in a language which is now called the Proto-indoeuropean language.

One may say this, but although Poland has been proposed as the Proto-Indo-European Urheimat, the most popular candidate for this place is the Pontic-Caspian steppe. Others argue forcefully for Anatolia.
Des Essientes   
29 Dec 2014
History / Origins of Polish Slavs [138]

The Poles came from the same places as others. People kept moving onto other places where there was more food, more to hunt and gather, and less crowding.

If the Polish Slavs are the autochthonic population of Poland then they did indeed arrive as hunter-gatherers many thousands of years ago, but if Slavs had been in Central Europe all along then why are they not mentioned in any written sources until 550 AD? The more widely accepted theory is that Slavs migrated into the area not as hunter-gatherers but as horticulturalists and herders during the Fifth Century.
Des Essientes   
30 Jan 2014
Genealogy / Do I look Polish? (my picture) [375]

One option might be to go to Ellis Island and enquire there, as that's where most were processed and admitted.

Going to Ellis Island would probably be pointless because her OP states that her family is from Baltimore:

city of origin in the US (Baltimore)

A lot of the Polish immigrants coming to the USA, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, had the port city of Baltimore, and not Ellis Island, as their landing point. All of my paternal great-grandparents arrived in the USA via Baltimore. Much of this Polish immigration through Baltimore was "illegal" and so there is no government record of the processing and admission of these immigrants.
Des Essientes   
26 Nov 2013
History / Differences between Poland and Russia [43]

Where did you go to school?

I went to public high school in Southern California and the partitions of Poland were included in the history curriculum.

I know for a fact that there are highschools in CA, OR and WA which do not teach the partitions in their history classes/ curriculum.

Are you really sure that you know this for a "fact"?

Chicago by any chance?

Polish-Americans live throughout the United States. It isn't just in places wherein they are highly concentrated that Poland is mentioned in history courses. It isn't always lobbying by an ethnic group that gets its ancestral homeland's history included in curricula, and it most certainly isn't the case with respect to Polish history. The partitions of Poland are included in history courses in the USA because they are such blatant cases of the greed and immorality of autocracies. The republic of the United States uses the actions of Prussia, Austro-Hungary, and Russia as negative examples when educating her citizenry.
Des Essientes   
26 Nov 2013
History / Differences between Poland and Russia [43]

EuropeInterestingly though, except when talking about WW2, Poland is never mentioned in history classes in the west as far as I know.

The partitions of Poland are mentioned in high school history classes in the United States and the textbooks used often include a famous political cartoon, of the time, depicting three fat and ugly caricatures of the partitioning powers.
Des Essientes   
31 Oct 2013
Life / Halloween vs All Saints' Day in Poland [48]

Halloween is only superficially about shallow consumerism. The deeper meaning of the holiday is about acknowledging the reality of death. Children face their fears on Halloween, engage in adventurous pranks and gorge themselves on the candies that they so enjoy, but Halloween is even more fun for their elders. Adults indulge their passions for creativity, and satire, in the clever costuming that they devise for themselves, and at the house parties and nightclubs they attend a delicious atmosphere humor, and eroticism prevails. Halloween is a celebration of joy and sex in the face of death and it is grand!
Des Essientes   
6 Jul 2013
News / Poland will have a queen again [75]

So, as long as Belgium will keep existing as a country, a constitutional monarchy is the best option. A president would be highly decisive. He would be the president of the Flemish, or the Walloons, but neither of both.

Hahahahahahaha! Way to bungle, Belgian!

How dare anyone call the Queen of England the English Queen what an outrage but its fine calling other benefit claimants dole scum and bottom feeders? They give themselves a whole series of official .titles carried with pride, it is frankly a dead heat between the Windsors and the ex politburo members as to who had the most ridiculous chest full of gongs.

Hear Hear!

Nothing to do with Ireland (yet again) and everything to do with democracy and financial probity

Barney it appears that the bitter British on this forum cannot forget that the Irish revolted and threw their monarchy out. Every time you post, Barney, they will read your posts as those of an Irish rebel. A rebel like the ones who humiliated their imperial monarchy. Poland and Ireland and the USA all know that the republican form of government is far superior to governments that maintain royal families at the public expense, and Britain's monarchy is most certainly maintained at the public expense despite the pathetic lies of Harry, jon357 and the rest.

Barney, when faced with an angry royalist gang you have acquitted yourself admirably by exposing their lies. PF would be a far worse place were it not for republicans like you.

Horsefaced Lizzy is the Queen of England and she, and her "regal" ilk elsewhere, are a stupid anachronism.

This post is nothing more than flaming.
Des Essientes   
25 Jun 2013
History / History of Poland in a pill - illustrated [38]

A huge spider spun a web in the entry to the cave, thus stopping the pursuit.

I wonder how many cultures have a version of this story. The Muslims tell of Muhammad and Abu Bakr's flight from Mecca. Pursued by Meccan soldiers, led by Satan himself, they sheltered the first night in a cave, and Allah caused a spider to weave a web over the entrance, thus fooling their pursuers into believing the cave was unoccupied.
Des Essientes   
18 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

he detested Slavs and had big problems with them. One of his problems with Austria was that they allowed to many Slavs to live there.

Hitler was an Austrian that joined the German army, rather than the Austrian army, in WW1 because he didn't want to serve in an army containing such a high percentage of Slavs.

True but we can only wonder how it would look like if he won the war.

Indeed, threads like this one, that proport to give "answers" to questions involving massive counter-factuals, may be interesting to read but these answers have absolutely no historical value. History is about what actually happened and no one can claim to know the truth about how WW2 would've turned out if the titular counter-factual had actually happened.
Des Essientes   
21 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

People believing that a mandatory interview about prospective residency had no bearing on whether residency would be allowed are either deluded or disingenuous.

Vexatious trolling by somebody with a very, very unhealthy obsession.

Yes trolling, that is exactly what Jon357 is doing here. He is trolling because he cannot allow any information to be revealed on this forum that shows that some Jews in Poland have actually been discriminatory towards Gentiles in Poland. Such information deviates from the myth of eternal Jewish victimhood. So he personally attacks people by calling them unhealthily obsessed. These are low-down, dirty and scummy smear tactics. Foreigner4 put it well earlier in this thread:

There are two sides to every story in history, unless it is the story of the Jews- then there is only one story and any deviation from it is sure to draw the "racism" choir, ultimately drowning any discussion on it..

Des Essientes   
19 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

If the obligatory interviews with the Jewish Community Board that were required for Gentiles requesting permission to move into the center of the town of Bransk were just a formality, that had no bearing upon whether of not said Gentiles would be allowed to move into the center of Bransk, then why were they mandatory? People that are not insane will infer that these interviews were indeed held to decide wether or not said Gentiles would be allowed to move to the center of town.

I seem to remember that you were told that if you again make references to people's supposed mental health problems, you'd be banned. Shall I PM the mod in question?

Please "PM" the mod. All of the moderators here are sick of your ridiculous antics. I am sure that this mod will have a good laugh at your paranoiac assumption that my reference to sane readers is worthy of suspension.
Des Essientes   
19 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

the man in question was "someone who worked in the town hall" and "vice mayor". You are of course free to keep claiming that he was a historian.

He is also a historian and he was interviewed in the documentary because of all the research he has done regarding the history of town of Bransk. He may not be a professional historian but he is a historian nonetheless. Herodotus didn't get paid for his historical research either, but he is nonetheless considered a historian. Harry, you are grasping at straws and it is hilarious! Hahahahahaha!

One presumes that if the vice mayor had wanted to say that gentiles needed permission in order to live in the centre of Bransk, he would have said that gentiles needed permission in order to live in the centre of Bransk, just as you claim that he said. Unfortunately, he did not say that.

Hahahahaha! He said the following:

If a Pole wanted to live there, he had to be interviewed by the Jewish community board.

The readers of this forum, that are not insane, can infer, from the above statement, that the Gentiles subjected to this mandatory interview were indeed required to receive permission from the Jewish Community Board before being allowed to move into the center of Bransk, otherwise the interview wouldn't have been required.

So for 60 years Jews were in the majority in Bransk and for hundreds of years Jews were not allowed to live in the town. I wonder why you wish to focus attention on the decades and not on the centuries.

Hahahahahaha! So my citing this interesting fact about the power granted the Jewish Community Board in Bransk is an attempt to "focus attention" away from the centuries! How paranoid are you? Do you really believe that my daring to relate this interesting fact about the history of Bransk is an Anti-Semitic plot?

How very interesting. Unfortunately there is a rule against posting PMs in open forum and so I can't post it here; however, I was told by a mod that my suspension was imposed by a mod other than the one you mention. Perhaps you might like to get your story straight?

What mod did I mention? My story is as straight as an arrow unlike your hilariously serpentine illogic.
Des Essientes   
19 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

You have repeatedly stated that the documentary made the claim.

The documentary made the claim in that a historian featured in the documentary made it.

Care for me to link to those statements?

I don't care.

He says quite specifically " If a Pole wanted to live there, he had to be interviewed by the Jewish community board." Nothing about permission being needed.

Hahahahahahaha! Harry, you really are clowning now! Do you honestly believe that these mandatory interviews were not about the granting of permission to live in the center of Bransk? If not then why require them for prospective residents?

Des Essientes: Weren't you just suspended for three months for accusing another poster of being drunk? Yes you were.
Actually, no. Do feel free to ask your friend to forward you the PM in question.

Harry, you accused a poster of being drunk on the main forum and you were suspended. A moderator had previously warned you to stop trolling in that manner. Your suspension was not the result of a "PM". I would like you to know that I reported your obnoxious slur against said poster and reminded the moderator of his promise to suspend you. It worked! For three months this forum was free of your lies and your logical fallacies.
Des Essientes   
19 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

You have repeatedly claimed that an American Jewish film-maker stated that the Jewish elders of Bransk had the right to forbid Gentiles from living in the town center. That claim is nothing more than a lie.

No, Harry you are the one that is lying. I never claimed that a Jewish-American filmaker stated this fact about Bransk. A Polish historian in a film produced by a Jewish-American filmaker stated this fact. Your claim that I have "repeatedly" stated otherwise shows the forum, yet again, that you are delusional.

As it happens, I would normally find that a constant repetition of Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! while simultaneously spitting out a thesaurus and making mistakes with basic English to be more than suggestive that a poster is somewhat drunk.

How about poster like you that repeatedly lies like a rug and posts logical fallacies? Are you drunk on booze or just drunk on resentment towards others who speak the truth about Polish history? Weren't you just suspended for three months for accusing another poster of being drunk? Yes you were. Will you ever learn?

In Des's mind, shtetl were straight outta Fiddler On the Roof.

Jason, I have never seen "Fiddler on the Roof" because I despise musicals. Your claim to know the contents of my mind is stupidly presumptuous.

Of course a gentile wouldn't want to be caught "conspiring" with Jews, and would get a letter or some such saying they had business to conduct there. There was no "permission" to be given.

Jason, if a Gentile wanted to reside in the center of Bransk, in the 19th Century, then he had to receive permission from the Jewish elders of Bransk. This permission that the Polish historian spoke of, in the documentary Sztetl, was for residency, not for merely for conducting business.
Des Essientes   
18 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

Could it be from later on that the documentary is referencing? Could you both be right, but not talking about the same time periods?

Yes billpawl, the privilege that the Jewish elders of Bransk had in denying Gentiles the right to live in the town center of Bransk does date from the time after the partitions, but since Harry is wrong to claim that this privilege never existed then he cannot be right. Harry uses the false dichotomy fallacy in the following statement:

So we are left with four possibilities

Yes, we have established that; however there are four theoretically possible explanations for that statement (as outlined above).

Who is this "we" you are speaking of Harry? None but yourself is pretending that your four possibilities are exhaustive. Why are you using the plural "we" to put forth this fallacy? Perhaps you are using the "royal we", H.N.R.I..........hhaha!

By the way, the "Hahahaha!" adds nothing to this discussion and suggests a very disrespectful attitude.

You find laughter suggestive of disrespect. Others, without a huge chip on their shoulder, may see it as an expression of amusement, and it certainly is amusing to watch the purveyor of logical fallacies put in his place.

So to say that Jews had priviliges or advantages over other Poles is an anachronism.

Yehudi doesn't understand what "anachronism" means. Just because people were born into their respective social groups in medieval times in no way makes the privileges enjoyed by one group over another somehow "unreal" by modern standards.
Des Essientes   
15 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

You keep claiming the documentary says that that but for some reason you won't support that claim.

Hahahaha! I have given my word upon the forum that I saw it. Anyone can aquire the documentary and see for themselves if I am mistaken. If it matters that much to you, and, given your obsessive performance upon this forum regarding the subject of Polish Jewry, one may assume that it does, then see the documentary for yourself. But, be forewarned: The documentary is several hours long.

a town where non tolerandis Judaeis applied

Are claiming that Jews were not allowed to live in Bransk? The documentary was produced by a Jew whose Jewish ancestors were from Bransk.

the centre of town was an area where no Catholics could live, because only Jews could live there.

Wrong, Catholics could live in the center of the town if the Jewish town elders approved. That is what the documentary stated and I found it surprising, but there are a lot of things revealed in that documentary that were surprising.
Des Essientes   
15 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

the very simple fact remains that in Bransk there was non tolerandis Judaeis and not non tolerandis christianis.

According to the documentary I saw the center of the town of Bransk was uniformly Jewish and the Polish authorities granted the leaders of the Jewish community the right to refuse residency to Polish Gentiles attempting to move into that part of the town. This doesn't mean that the Polish authorities didn't also place restriction on Jewish residency in Bransk as well. You seem to be ignorantly believing that these residency regulations are somehow mutually exclusive. They are not.
Des Essientes   
15 Mar 2013
History / Terrible past for the Jews in Poland? [930]

Harry, I saw the film about the history of Bransk and it said that Gentiles were required to obtain permission from the Jewish town fathers before being allowed to reside in the town's center. If you don't believe me then so be it, but you need only watch the film to be disabused of your ignorance.

Harry, in the future I would also like you to address me by my full screen name. The use of a diminutive of my screen name sounds very creepy coming from someone like you.