Po polsku / Kobiety odrzucają politykę kościoła [56]


U pojebanych Anglosów ogłoszono "transfobią" ograniczanie zabiegów "zmiany" płci wyłącznie do osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi znanymi jako "dysforia płciowa". To znaczy, każdy gnojek który sobie zamarzy, może sobie uciąć kutasa i udawać kobietę.

Będąc przebierańcem, osoba zdana jest do końca życia na wstrzykiwanie sobie estrogenu, pod ryzykiem dla zdrowia i życia, ponieważ organizm nie jest już w stanie regulować własnych hormonów. To nie tak, że może sobie darować na jakiś czas i będzie tylko trochę mniej przypominać kobietę.

Spory odsetek wszystkich dziwadeł to dzieciaki które przeczytały bzdury na portalach społecznościowych (zjawisko analogiczne do propagowania anoreksji), geje z "homofobią" chcący zostać kobietami by nienawidzić siebie mniej, fetyszyści (najczęściej faceci w średnim wieku z historią przebierania się w damską bieliznę) i narcyści wyrażający w ten sposób samo-uwielbienie.

Są jeszcze trans-pedofile nakłaniający dzieci do wstrzykiwania sobie hormonów, często zapraszający do siebie czy podający sposoby załatwienia sobie dawek w postaci kontrabandy. Jakkolwiek pedofilia w przypadku zwyczajnego gejowania to margines, wśród trans-fetyszystów to prawdziwe zjawisko.

Ponadto, wstrzykiwanie sobie estrogenu przez kilka pierwszych lat powoduje euforię. Dzieciaki jednocześnie radykalizują się trans-ideologią i odurzają preparatem. Estrogen w ilości nadmiernej dla męskiego organizmu jest trujący, dla każdego z dziwadeł bez wyjątku.

Dla mnie niech sobie żyją tak długo jak nikomu nie wciskają "transfobii" i nie próbują wymuszać zmiany poglądów. Kogoś kto to praktykuje trans-aktywizm, nie nazwałbym przez grzeczność kobietą.

thefederalist.com/2021/02/27/snapchat-is-a-transgender-propaganda-and-grooming-machine/

Life / Poles turn their backs on organised religion. [147]


Atheism, secular humanism, marxism, liberalism, all just tools of the enemies of humanity in their eternal war against Christians and against the seed of Rome. Embrace any branch of their poison at your peril.

Life / Poles turn their backs on organised religion. [147]


It is fair to say there isn't an atheist argument against religion that isn't aimed at Christianity, Protestants being the first target and the Catholic church only secondarily but I'm assuming that is mostly because English speaking atheists mostly had Protestants to content with.

Other religions are rarely touched, or seen with approval under the mistaken notion they are "free thinking" and not "oppressive", which is false either in regards to Hinduism, what with the caste system and everything and Buddhism which is actually just as harsh as Christianity in its ascetic demands (no free love there lmao).

Life / Poles turn their backs on organised religion. [147]

Atheists have no principles beyond hating Christians

youtu.be/OC53AHXNNIc

If you have less than three minutes to spare, I invite you to see a most satisfying spectacle: an atheist fraud got caught in his own web of lies, squirming and sweating, and eventually getting into such a state that he actually claimed the Founding Fathers of USA said that we were given unalienable rights by evolution.

Also, the youtube id for this video is id=OC53AHXNNIc;list=PLU-nJq1k5wmgTmwvHMXBq8jew-8LpfDSh, so I knew I had to post it. Deus Vult.

News / Poles march against Mandatory poisoning by vaccines [202]


You know Jon, maybe you should take ALL the vaccines available and then make a YT channel about it. Tell us which one you liked best.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]

Equality of the sexes doesn't make any sense because the sexes are clearly not equal.

I don't like to use the word gender due to the leftist connotations.

I don't support anything that can be achieved with affirmative actions or quotas.
I consider active attempts to alter status quo (for example by pumping resources into trying to give promising but underprivileged people equal start, but lowering requirements) or other forms of affirmative actions accomplish exact opposite of their stated goals.

The problem now is the lowering of the standard to compensate for women's inferior ability. I really have no problem with women wanting to be a part of anything quite frankly, but the same expectations should apply, with the emphasis being on the subject's performance. Like for instance, in most military institutions, they have a strict set of requirements on male recruits, so simply being a male doesn't guarantee you a spot. However, you then have females coming in, who literally perform at a much lower level than even worst of the males, let alone the ones that truly qualify, and these women get the spot solely because of their sex. If anything, this reverses the inequality spectrum of the two sexes, putting men in a huge disadvantage here, for having to live up to a higher standard of expectations while getting the same amount of pay as women who get by with mediocrity.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]

Here are some weightlifting records (combined):

Men -56 kg: 307 kg
Women -58 kg: 252 kg

Men -105 kg: 437 kg
Women +87 kg: 348 kg (Tatiana Kashirina=107 kg)

Want more fun?
Men -62 kg: 333 kg

Yep, the strongest woman in the world barely lifts more than a 62 kg man.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]


In order to do it you must lower the standard to compensate for women's inferior ability. The rules for both sexes should be the same, but by no means is it to be achieved by dragging the measuring stick down and pussifying men, or babysitting women. Women have never broken the 10 second barrier in the 100m sprint, for instance.

fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/04/confessions-of-ex-feminist.html

Muslims rapes in the West are a symptom of the breakdown of the Feminist Utopia. Women's freedoms need to be enforced, or they are meaningless. Even though women can take steps to protect themselves, the primary responsibility for protection will always belong to men. Women will only have as much freedom as their men are willing and capable of guaranteeing them. It is a major flaw in many feminist theories that they fail to appreciate this fact. Perhaps you can succeed in turning your men into doormats, but it will be on the cost of doing so to your nation and to your civilization as well. Male energy is a driving force of any dynamic culture.

Amen.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [957]


Józef Piłsudski.


Not by some sort of popular elections, no. Military coup would have been necessary.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [957]


We don't have true kings, anymore, but instead the hand rubbing godless globalist satanist merchants. You can't be much further from the definition of a true king than that. Even a cockroach is closer to a king than this.

A true king is a leader, not a boss. He feels loyalty and responsibility for his people. What we have now is godless mercenaries who are only looking out for themselves and are executing the will of their archon overlords. They cannot be killed, they are utterly replaceable, they have no responsibility. They are what CEOs are to true entrepreneurs.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [957]

I do like proper Monarchy myself. Where the king is tied to the land, feels and acts responsible for it and its denizens and can occasionally be killed.

Poland from before the zabory, the Rzeczpospolita Szlachecka may be also example to look up to.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]


LEFTARDS= beta males. Simple as that.

The situation is this: dominant males don't give a sh!t about women, but still get all the sex. Beta males care about women, but get no sex. And who do you think is to blame here? Dominant males, of course! The mangina delusion in a nutshell.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]


Being submissive to women is the fundamental condition of beta faggotry. It has everything to do with beta fags being "womanish". Otto Weininger figured this out a long time ago but nobody paid attention to him because all you god damn moderntards are too busy jerking off to your sophisticamated nominaltard bullshit to pay attention to anything based on the simple observation of concrete realities.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]


... and are replaced with with thirdworlders who refuse to be emasculated and let the masculine principle to work together with the feminine principle to create and provide for the furthering and general health of society.

In the main, I am not opposed to women pursuing which ever path they chose for themselves, whether it's science, art or whatever, as long as the principle of masculinity and the principle of femininity remain well defined entities. But that is not what is happening you see? Neither masculinity nor femininity have any meaning anymore, and women are encouraged, nay, almost arm twisted in partaking into activities which have traditionally been the domain of men and which require a level of conceptual ability most women simply do not posses, for whatever we might say about the exception, the reality of gender is the rule. For every woman who can think conceptual there are thousands more who's only concern is nurturing (yes, that's the god damn kitchen), and they will bring nurturing with them into the conceptual world of man and by extension destroying this world. That is, btw, why men are so intimidated by women, and once women begin to flock into their world, men will simply move somewhere else, until there's no where else to go at which point they will retire into idleness and self indulgence.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]


Don't you ever get bored of those retarded empty platitudes? "Partnerships ".

The western world is being dismantled precisely because of this wishy-washy sentimentalism that is death to all spirituality by virtue of it's suffocating banality.

It's like you think life is a romcom. Do you seriously, genuinely believe people have "partnerships"? That men and women are attracted to each other because they like their respective subjectivities? Don't you see there are more primal forces a work (and i don't mean merely biological ones)?

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]


Yeah, a little difference of opinions never hurts. Except when its muh values and muh morality. Leftard trololo.

Indeed, I got to where I am by doubting the leftard narrative in the first place. By doubting the idea that race does not exist, by doubting the notion of equality among the sexes, by doubting the materialism of modern science, and so forth. In fact, my descent into right-wingery started when I first disagreed with a retarded SJW on workplace, in what almost feels like a lifetime ago. "Free" thinking seems to go both ways, doesn't it.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]


For every women who didn't get to vote because of "oppression", there was a man going down on a sinking boat because women and children had to go first. So called "patriarchal" societies weren't driven by a desire to keep women down for the benefit of men. If they relegated women to an inferior social position, they did so not out of malice but out of a particular understanding of the sexes and the roles both men and women had to have in a society, and this reflected in the way those same societies were equally hard on men on a different level.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]

That's why you are so miserable. You are living in denial.
We don't hate women. That is just a leftard canard. To argue that we hate women for merely refuting to accept any distortion of the natural order of things is like arguing that to refute the idea animals should be considered equal to humans is to actually hate animals.

Love / How do Polish men feel about gender equality? [780]

Marxist thinking, Marxist thinking never changes.

The irony is that being a woman was better in traditional societies as well. People are happier when they are allowed to be what they are. Shocking concept, i know.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [957]

The West isn't interested in helping refugees. All they care about is their deranged multikult ideals. This is why refugees actually make less than half of the total number of Muslim migrants coming into Europe. And also why Germony was blocking refugees from Ukraine.

This is all about making the Europe "less white" and it has nothing to do with helping Syrians, or anyone in need.

News / Poles say a big YES to our European Union [957]


I am not surprised. Europeans are cucks. It makes me want to let the Muslims go visit and rape you all, but sadly that would affect us as well.

Your ignorant, irrational beliefs are not truth. Do you know how you can objectively determine which societies are good and which societies are bad? Bad societies are societies people want to leave, they produce emigrants. In contrast, good societies attract immigrants, because they are places where people actually want to live. Proves that communism was sh!t (they literally had to lock people in because those societies were so horrible), proves that Islam is sh!t.

As long as Muslims keep leaving the Islamic world to come to the West while we certainly don't want to live in sharia ********* they are not telling us how to build something good.

Morals? Dignity? Self-respect? Patriotism? You know the things decent, respectable people have, but Muslims unfortunately don't. And one cannot build something good on lies. We do not actually have a "Every bedouin who wants some juicy welfare can come here" offer, you know? They need to claim to be "refugees" and that they are coming here for "protection". If they said the truth.. the authorities wouldn't accept them.

And they need to keep lying. E.g. if they were open about their beliefs and goals not even the German Green party would defend them. It's all dependent on lies. On fraud.

Muslims are pretty much animals. They don't want to build their own wealth, just like we did, instead of trying to jump into our made bed. Germans, Poles, etc had and have to work hard for it. Prosperity does not rain from the sky here, and unlike in the Gulf Arab states it does not come out of the ground either. We have to work for it, and then foreign parasites come feeling entitled to it. They certainly aren't.

History / What Poland expected from western Europe? [78]


Today, material wealth or power is mostly a source of pride and hypocrisy, but that is just a symptom of the dysfunction of modernity.

History / What Poland expected from western Europe? [78]


No. It would destroy Poland.
There was a time when the "West" itself wasn't actually modern, and one can say the west was modernism's first victim.

Human beings had it right before "science" and moderntardation. You just don't know what you don't know. The peasant who thought the sun was God knew more about "reality" than any astrophysicist.

To this, I would also add that part of the reason your so called "science" took the direction it did, away from the purely rational order the men of the Enlightenment were looking for, into this Babylonian pseudo-metaphysical mumbo jumbo about parallel dimensions, nothing being something other than nothing, all that assorted Quantum quackery, is that mankind needs the transcendent. Human beings need the infinite. By focusing entirely on material reality, while closing any pathway towards the place where real transcendence and actual infinity can be found, you forced people to try to fulfill this inner desire for things that are above contingency while being firmly imprisoned in a realm of pure contingency itself. The result is that people started to seek escape by cracking contingency apart, by piercing through the veil of "normality", reaching, not freedom, not expansion, but distortion and deviation. Not content with the natural world, you started to look in microscopes at the infinitely small, and in space for the infinitely vast, reveling in the intoxicating sense of vertigo generated by those ventures to the point now the simple observation of natural phenomena appears quaint and childish (this point was raised by Tarkovsky in Solaris). Science fiction was then created to fulfill the need to escape from "everyday" life into this realm of pseudo-infinity and pseudo-liberation. The same concept applies to art. Not content with the purely formalistic and all "too human" confines of "classical" art, you sought escape into pure essence, and thus again formlessness and distortion, hence modern art. And it just goes on and on like this. In the realm of sexuality, where you begun by braking free of mores and taboos, which, operating in a manner similar to a drug, led to more and more extreme experimentation (hence all the kiddie focking we see among the elites, who are at the vanguard of the effects of modernism, unlike the proles, whose stupidity actually works as a protection of sort. BTW, the same concept here applies to the development for a thirst for violence, sadism and graphic horror). And on and on like this. In every sphere of life, there comes this tendency to want to brake free, hence the desire to brake things apart, to disdain and subsequently seek to destroy everything that contains any trace of limitation. Everything becomes mired in this contorted esoterization of contingent phenomena. And of course, lastly, the primary effects of braking contingency apart is nothing other then multiplicity and quantity. That's really the driving force of modernity. Braking up contingency merely means creating ever more subdivisions, which then become their own elusive reward, for no matter how big the quantity, it is never enough, it is never quite close to true infinity, hence the push for ever more and more quantity. Hence also this obsession with extreme "complexity", which ironically also begets an opposite reaction into extreme simplicity to escape the confines of complexity and then back again into complexity as the need to escape the inescapable can only result in a viscous circle from which there is no escape.

And that, in a nutshell, is your precious modernity. And in a world that prides itself as having been able to "expand" and seek freedom from contingency but which in reality has only managed to create deviations and distortions coated in escapist fantasies, the simple life of an ancient, who was completely content with his few needs and with the natural world surrounding him, would appear incredibly backward and limiting, and the notion that such a "primitive" individual could possibly have a greater understanding of anything, let alone reality, would most certainly appear to be laughable. Except such a man did have a greater understanding of things, hence, why he did not seek to indulge and lead his civilization to the same type of extremes and abuses of physical reality that characterize this modern monstrosity all you demented faggots seem to be so proud of. The fact ancient peoples may have been naive and ignorant of certain "facts" of physical reality means absolutely nothing. What they had and what they knew was not worth losing to gain some dubious material advantage, which is really the only thing moderns can seem to offer, since modernity has nothing of value to provide except for brute dominion over matter.

News / The Witcher 3 game - Poland's great success [37]

cybercuck is sh!t, oh no, shock and disbelief

News / Thousands of Polish women attend Czarny Piątek rally in Warsaw [780]


Speaking with people who refuse to acknowledge potency and act gets really tiresome. Imagine talking about geography with a flat earth adept.

Still, let's try again.

The fetus is destined to be a human being. Disrupting the process of its development is the same as killing the person.

Funny thing is that most PETArds are probably pro abortion. How is it ok to kill a fetus, but it's cruel to eat eggs? At what point does the ovum become a chicken?

News / Thousands of Polish women attend Czarny Piątek rally in Warsaw [780]


Did i?


Why? Why can they take that decision away from another person?
Who decides what 'sever defects' are?

There's your death panels, just like the very democratic solo death panels of every individual prospective mother - which is very liberal, individualistic position.


and thus we finally arrive at my favourite kind of abortionist logic leaps, where the answer to "there are underlying socio-economic problems that make giving birth and raising a child rough" is "kill the child" and somehow this is a perfectly sound statement

News / Thousands of Polish women attend Czarny Piątek rally in Warsaw [780]


The only question to discuss here is "do people with birth defects deserve to live?" If the answer is NO, then sure, abort them, but also kill anyone with birth defects that is currently alive, regardless of age. If the answer is YES, then you may not abort him. There is no moral difference between killing a person before or after birth, so it is nonsense to restrict eugenics policy to fetuses.

News / Thousands of Polish women attend Czarny Piątek rally in Warsaw [780]


A person born with a severe disability still will, at some point of his life and quite early if I may say (not more than 20 years needed), obtain an ability to simply kill themselves. If living as a cripple was oh so terrible as you make it sound to be, then we wouldn't even be seeing cripples doing what they can to endure and live however they can, now would we? Instead, from war veterans to people who had a freak work-related accident that had made them cripples, will often times choose to live with it, coping however they can, and even go out of their way to live their lives to the fullest (from their perspective).

And what is so terrible in allowing such child to be born? Yes, a world of pain and suffering awaits them, but over time - decades if need be - they may yet discover something to give them sufficient comfort and enjoyment in life. Alternatively, if they fail to do so, well they can simply kill themselves (and damn themselves in the process, but that's another topic). An average human lifespan is around 80 years, and like I said 20 years is enough for such people to make a choice: end it all, or endure. You want to deprive them of said choice simply because it is convenient for you to do so, or you subscribe to what is essentially a "projected morality", where your beliefs & experiences you deem as absolute and needing to be applied to everyone else.

News / How do Poles feel about Biden? [59]


The first order of business is going to be dissident suppression. This means "non-stop" flood of non-whites (Biden's own words), "white man bad" propaganda in everything, 24/7, complete sanitation of the internet until it becomes as water tight as TV, and so on and so forth.

America is essentially headed to become South Africa and Americans are going to love every minute of it.

News / How do Poles feel about Biden? [59]

Now that Biden will be at the helm, say hello to the American Empire again.
I wonder where will the American Empire strike back first.
-NATO expansion - Belarus and Serbia?
-Franco-Israeli proxy war - Lebanon?