News /
The spiritual heirs of the Polish Communist Party [91]
Request seconded, Ms journalist.
You just showed you true colors A. You doing it all the time and yet you view yourself or you want to be viewed by others as somebody impartial.
Let make it clear once and for all, you are partisan of political clique, biased to the core - end off!
Ok, enough of rumbling ;)
Yes I agree that little speech you have written there means nothing, it just noise, a waste of typing power.
HHis words could have big impact on GW (also financial one)
That statement is provable and you could be brought to court if you lie, I'm sure that is the only reason you used the word "could"! As you know that Rymkiewicz's words had no impact at all on GW neither financial nor moral.
said that it is Concience-Logic Syndrome.
No it is a left bolox syndrome!
So, can we use defamation law, or not?
I have already explained my stance and the fact that there is no contradiction. Predictably you choose to ignore my explanation and quote once again my posts because you have nothing else to support your logical fallacy. I'm sure that you will bring it few more times. Good luck.
Bashing the Bible is not a political debate and serve no other purpose but bashing for a sake of bashing,hence should be punishable by the law.
On the other hand Rymkiewicz's words were a part of public, political debate in which GW takes active part for years and what more it was an opinion, hence the law should keep away.
One of the clearest of those boundaries is accusing someone of a crime without offering concrete proof. In this case that boundary was crossed.
What crime editors of GW have been accused, pry tell !
Say, I am a bar owner. You run your local community paper. One day you assert in your paper that I hate Irish Catholic people. I summon you first to publicly apologize and optionally compensate me for your wrongdoing. You refuse. I sue you. Now the burden is on you to prove in court my Irish-Catholic-hating attitude.
Say that story has nothing to do with the case we discus. Firstly it was newspaper that somebody expressed opinion about!Secondly business wasn't some bar but political publishing of politically controversial opinions. One would expect that such newspaper would be first to defend freedom of speech in political debate, soon that ruling could be used against them with impunity and if then they will scream murder I will laugh!
Not under the Polish civil law.
Lets agree for the sake of an argument that you are right about that. You would agree with me that the law should apply equally to everyone.?
Well, it isn't happening because GW many times published articles which in the light of the case were slanderous and should be punished by the law.
Anyway I still think that for the sake of freedom of speech such ruling shouldn't have happened.