The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by delphiandomine  

Joined: 25 Nov 2008 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - Q
Last Post: 17 Feb 2021
Threads: Total: 86 / Live: 15 / Archived: 71
Posts: Total: 17823 / Live: 4649 / Archived: 13174
From: Poznań, Poland
Speaks Polish?: Yeah.
Interests: law, business

Displayed posts: 4664 / page 139 of 156
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
delphiandomine   
22 Dec 2010
Life / Stubborn Polaks, anyone knows? [77]

Plastic Paddies, nothing else.

How many of them can name the Irish President, I wonder? Heck, I wonder if many of them can even name the Taoiseach?
delphiandomine   
22 Dec 2010
Life / Stubborn Polaks, anyone knows? [77]

In other words, America is populated by thugs who take offence at the slightest thing?

(for what it's worth, Irish-Americans are not Irish).
delphiandomine   
22 Dec 2010
Life / Stubborn Polaks, anyone knows? [77]

if you're not that ethnicity see if they wont get offended

I know a few Irish people and none of them are bothered by Mick or Paddy.
delphiandomine   
22 Dec 2010
Life / Stubborn Polaks, anyone knows? [77]

Jock would be far better ;) Nothing worse than being mistaken for being English :P
delphiandomine   
22 Dec 2010
Life / Stubborn Polaks, anyone knows? [77]

Who gets offended by Anglo??

I'd be highly offended if anyone called me Anglo!
delphiandomine   
22 Dec 2010
Life / Stubborn Polaks, anyone knows? [77]

Polak in English is ethnic slur word. Proper English word to name a person of Polish nationality is "Pole".

Only in American English - in British English, we wouldn't use it at all. I only use it on here to antagonise "dumb Polacks" ;)

I see it highly unpropriate that Poles and people od Polish descent use word "Pollack"

polockjohnnys.com

It's arguable that it's not even an ethnic slur in the USA - plenty of people are using it freely, and it doesn't seem to have the same impact as the n-bomb, for instance.
delphiandomine   
21 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

The religionists still have not answered to the accusations made by Father Wiśniewski.
They rant about GW, very poor argument.

Of course they haven't - did you really expect them to rationally talk about what he has to say? Nope, they bring up Michnik and GW yet again - which is exactly the kind of behaviour that Wisniewski is warning about. Funny, no?

By the way, how it is possible that the Lunar Twins were living in PRL times in Żolibórz in a spacious flat? Maybe their family did something special?

I think we all know that daddy Kaczynski sold himself to the Communist authorities - it may explain in part Kaczynski's hatred towards Communists - he's still trying to convince himself that his father wasn't a traitor.
delphiandomine   
21 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

I understand it just fine - it's utter nonsense to use someone's origins against them in Poland, because there are so many people with different origins.

Even if Michnik is a "Jewish Jew" - what's the issue? Why does his religion have anything to do with his politics?
delphiandomine   
21 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Is Adam Michnik Jew or not? He says he is Jew so what's your problem commie.

He says he's a "Pole with Jewish origins". That doesn't make him Jewish, but it certainly makes him Polish.

Unless of course, you think "Jewish origins = Jew" - in which case, you admit that many of Poland's greatest figures aren't actually Polish at all. Like Mickiewicz, who was Polish of Lithuanian origins. Or even Pilsudski.
delphiandomine   
21 Dec 2010
Life / Babcia or Busha - any social class difference? [359]

Well, Poles straight from Poland are offended by it.

Wrong. Poles couldn't care less about it - because they don't know it as a racial slur.

We left Poland 100 years ago, as it was being over run by Ukranians claiming to be Polish too.

Uh, when did this happen? If they left 100 years ago, there was no Poland - so how could Ukrainians "overrun" it?
delphiandomine   
21 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

The fact that you keep using "Jewish" to describe someone as if it's some sort of inferior race suggests that the only "moron" is you.
delphiandomine   
21 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

and I wont until I read it but not crap from szmatławiec GW. Have you heard?: Wyborcza kłamie.

So, you're refusing to comment because it was published in Gazeta Wyborcza?

What a surprise - any excuse.

Poland's most popular newspaper. Educated Poles evidently prefer Gazeta Wyborcza's point of view to yours.

Indeed. The fact that they constantly denounce it means that there must be something of substance there - otherwise they'd just ignore it.

Wałęsa appointed him to head the Soldiairty as the organ of the entire anti-ciommunsti oppositon, but crafty little Adaś and his fellow-ethnic comaptriots turned it into a private corporation called Agora.

I take it you missed the part where Walesa embraced the free market.

Wałęsa had to withdraw the Solidarity emblem from the paper's front page.

Or could it be that they refused to back 'workers' with no interest apart from securing high salaries and pensions for themselves, along with working as little as possible for the highest possible reward?

By then, the GW corproate structures and distribution network had been firmly developed and reading Wybiórcza had become de rigueur for egghead circles and wannabe intellectuals or 'wykształciuchy' as they're called in Polish.

Ah, the jealousy is strong! Then again, I suppose Michnik and friends never ran away to the USA, unlike others.

Badly we still have in country some old idiots and young idiots, luckily most of the last one will change mind when they start reading other sources but for some there is no hope.

Yes, you're right. Hopefully, these idiots will realise that Gazeta Polska and the like are manipulating them soon. I doubt though - as you say, there's no hope.

Did anyone else apart from Aphro point out that its good that this criticism came from within the church?

I see none of the usual NASZA POLSKA POLSKA KOSCIOL NASZA POLSKA ANTI HOMO POLSKA crowd have commented on the article yet.

It happen it's GW whose owner is Jew and communist.

Uh - Agora is publicly traded. I hardly think all the owners are "jewish communists".

An open question : does anyone actually know any Jewish Communists?
delphiandomine   
20 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

the way they dictate to people how to vote from their pews.

This is exactly what the problem is with the Church - it seems completely unable to deal with issues like this. The Episcopate itself cannot decide to keep out of politics - so what hope is there for the ordinary priests?

That's one of the things I mean - marketing investments instead of taking care of the initial principles that are long-forgotten now.

Yup. While we have to accept that priests are only human - someone should have said "hey, no!" before the whole project started. The fact that the priest in charge of the project has repeatedly declined to say how much it costs says it all.

- I read about that, in Krakow there are similar cases together with the oldest football team Cracovia being almost kicked out by greedy sisters who claimed their land back on slightly silly proofs and also wanted sky-high prices.

I think this is really all Poland's own fault in a way - they totally failed to put a time limit on such claims - and now that the land is worth something, suddenly it's all being claimed.

I'm not a huge fan of the SLD, but I thoroughly support their call for a proper investigation into many of these claims.
delphiandomine   
20 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Whjy is it ruined? Personally i feel that the church does mountains of good and attacks on it are largely unjustified.

The problem is where the attacks have merit. Look at Poznan - the Church here has committed two massive mistakes within a year. First of all, they tried to kick out a public school from a building that they "reclaimed" - and now they're trying to claim 95 million zloty for parcels of land near Lake Malta - land which was already subject to an agreement between the City and Church.

These two incidents are the tip of the iceberg - and this the problem.

But it is! Not by the priest of course but by Gazeta Wyborcza, i wonder could it be because so many of its top brass are jewish ex-communists with a bone to pick with a church?

Or could it be that their readership doesn't believe in the all-reaching, all-emcompassing power of the Church? Could it be that the newspaper is run by people who didn't want to replace the dictatorship of Communism with a dictatorship of the Church?

The article isn't an attack by Gazeta Wyborcza - instead, it's probably one of the few outlets that could carry such a story with a degree of credibility. Unless of course, you subscribe to the belief that the Church should not be questioned - ever.

The question that this thread begs to ask is why Gazeta Wyborcza assaults the church with such iron consequence and such mindless agression, why every critique, every minor episode instantly becomes a major article in GW.

You might want to ask yourself why opponents of Gazeta Wyborcza pick on their every move with the same mindless aggression. Perhaps you might also want to question why the lower elements of society tend to attack Germans and Russians with venom, while other people have moved on. Exactly the same situation.

That's the essence of it: it is not an attack on the Polish church. It is rather an attack on the paganism within the Polish church, paganism so well established and cherished under the name of Jesus ...

If anything, it's an attack on the way that the Church has failed to adapt in Poland. Really, all the priest has done is say publicly what everyone is thinking - that it's an institution in crisis.

Gibberish, why does an essentially ex communist newspaper attack the church so much though?

Ex communist newspaper? Do you need reminded again that the editor in chief was locked up for several years by the communists? Nah...doesn't suit your agenda to admit that, does it?

You mean hundreds of shelters run by church in Poland do not help people? Oh wait they do!

The problem isn't with the hundreds of shelters, but rather where the money comes from to fund such shelters. Don't forget, the Church enjoys quite a few concessions - what's a few shelters to fund when you've already looted the country for billions?
delphiandomine   
20 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Sweden and Western Europe is increasingly becoming a moral and spiritual wasteland, sorry if for more your age of reason is a pit full of mindless soulless animals.

Soulless? Soulless is donating money to fund some giant grotesque statue - while letting people die of the cold.
delphiandomine   
20 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

wouldn't that be fantastic, to rid yourself of the shackles of fictional bullsh*t.

The problem is that the Church does a hell of a lot of good in Poland as well - but all the good work is ruined by the minority.

Accusations of this priest aside its alarming that GW publishes so many articles that in effect attack the church, i wonder why do they see the need to attack the Catholic Church so much?

This isn't an attack on the church to begin with, so why call it that?
delphiandomine   
19 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

It's a very interesting letter - and pretty much makes it clear that if the Polish church doesn't watch itself, they'll end up destroying themselves - just as they've done in Spain and Italy.

A bit strange then (or maybe not) that all the nationalists on this forum did not mention this open letter.

Calling Polonius3, Sokrates and all the dumb American Polacks - where are you?

But of course they won't mention it - the nationalists will have convinced themselves already that Wiesniewski is some sort of traitor.
delphiandomine   
17 Dec 2010
Work / Favourite English textbook (to learn/teach from)? [13]

Macmillan Publishings book "CPE Use Of English 1" is absolutely superb.

Thanks - I need a new CPE book with a class of mine. They started off originally using CPE Gold, but it's so mindblowingly dull!

Many of my students for example love English file series but I'm not so sure that's my fave to teach from.

I like the way it's done, but some of it is rather poor in my opinion.

There's a distinct lack of ESP Business books; a book that covers ALL aspects of Human resources (interviews, CVs, Health and Safety, Corporate Culture) or one that ONLY deals with Marketing and Sales and explores those areas thoroughly.

I totally, completely agree with you. I found one good book - it's called English for Promotion, written specifically for the Polish market. It's a bit dated now (it mentions Ireland being a success story) - but as a book which focuses on business promotion through sales, advertising, etc - it's rather good. It's also quite clever in the way that it introduces general business vocabulary while being about one topic in particular.

One huge problem with Business ESP books in general is that what's relevant to the UK/US sometimes just isn't relevant here at all. I'm fond of a book called Business Handbook (Advanced) though - it goes into a decent amount of detail and has fairly interesting exercises.
delphiandomine   
17 Dec 2010
Food / Is brain-damaging vegan fad growing in Poland? [176]

It turns them into Libs.

So why is the biggest Conservative I know a vegetarian? Why is it very fashionable among middle class kids who like nothing more than saying "mummy and daddy bought me a horse so I can ride well away from those nasty black people"?
delphiandomine   
17 Dec 2010
News / Polish President Lech Kaczynski and gov officials die in a plane crash in Russia [686]

It seems that you have difficulty accepting Tusk's opinion on the Russian report of the Smolensk crash. Why is that? He's not part of Kaczynski's political party.

So - are you now submitting to the authority of the Prime Minister when it comes to this investigation? Good. It's nice to see that you actually recognise the authority of this country's representatives. Now, why have you spent the last 8 months trying to argue against their authority, only to accept it now?

As I said all along - the Poles will do the right thing.
delphiandomine   
14 Dec 2010
USA, Canada / Polack/American Polonia/Plastic Pole "culture" [568]

Why does my 18yr old cousin who was born in the states speak perfect polish yet she cannot say a sentence without inserting English words?

Because it's "Ponglish".

Vile!

But endlessly fascinating too. If some Polack wants to mix English and Polish when speaking, why not? Means her language is "alive".
delphiandomine   
14 Dec 2010
USA, Canada / Polack/American Polonia/Plastic Pole "culture" [568]

You Claim to speak it badly. It must irritate you when so called Plastic Poles as you call them such as myself are able to speak perfect Polish ;)

Perfect Polish? I have my doubts, racist.

You probably speak gutter Polish, as spoken by peasants.

(for what it's worth, why would it bother me? I didn't grow up with people speaking Polish around me)
delphiandomine   
14 Dec 2010
USA, Canada / Polack/American Polonia/Plastic Pole "culture" [568]

Oh, in terms of colour, of course it ended up that way. But I mean - more that there isn't much in the way of one Polish heritage - it's all a complete mix. You can see this here quite clearly - some families have Eastern traditions, others have Germanic traditions - it's not all the same thing.

Wasn't there a fuss over the American Polonia wearing the "wrong" clothes?
delphiandomine   
14 Dec 2010
USA, Canada / Polack/American Polonia/Plastic Pole "culture" [568]

I celebrate my heritage

Do you know what your heritage actually is?

There is no such thing as "Polish" heritage, as the country has been a melting pot of nationalities and traditions for countless centuries.
delphiandomine   
13 Dec 2010
History / Tuchola in Poland - roots of Katyn? [220]

what did Ukraine have and what does it have today? no culture, no sovereignty, no money

Ukraine has plenty of culture. It's a shame that someone like you is so backwards (and obviously, the child of peasants that ran away to America - are your parents actually legally there?) that you can't appreciate it.

Then again, I've been there several times - when was the last time you were there?

No sovereignty? They've got plenty of it. Perhaps you might want to examine their current President's actual foreign policy rather than what's reported in the English press.

No money? I saw plenty of money going around in L'viv two months ago. Where's YOUR Mercedes, peasant?
delphiandomine   
13 Dec 2010
History / Tuchola in Poland - roots of Katyn? [220]

Became obvious. A bit late to include this truth in the defence plans. That's what we call the Western Betrayal exactly. Promises of engaging the common enemy in due time, not fulfilled.

But - why on earth did Poland believe it in the first place? I still cannot comprehend why Poland trusted an ally which had a Prime Minister that didn't want war with Hitler.

Can't comment for France, but the UK quite clearly was trying to avoid any sort of fight with Germany.

Except if the Allies did a little bit, with traditional army. Like bombing. Or moving some divisions a little bit more to the East. Into the German territory, like. With intent to proceed, Inshallah.

Sure, I think it's fairly well documented that Germany didn't have the capability to fight a two-front war.

Have you ever considered that perhaps, France and the UK (and the USA too, probably) wanted Germany and the Soviet Union to smash each other to pieces? Poland was unfortunately in the middle - and I think the British attitude (at least) towards Poland, ever since WWI was that Poland was a pain in the ass and not worth fighting for. I'm not even convinced that Britain was particularly keen on an independent Poland.

At least from the evidence (Versailles, Munich Agreement, Yalta) - I've never thought that Britain cared much about Poland at that time. There was a lot of lip service paid to Poland, but generally, not much in the way of actions.
delphiandomine   
13 Dec 2010
History / Tuchola in Poland - roots of Katyn? [220]

You're hopeless, man, really. Do some proper reading before you start posting opinions on Polish history. I can understand your pro-Michnik stance on how communism fell, but WW2 should be free of this bias. I thought.

So - you're telling me that the Polish forces didn't withdraw to that area near Lwów before the Russians invaded?

Poland was beaten the moment it became obvious that the UK/French forces had no intention of seriously engaging Germany. With a traditional army, they had no chance of surviving.

Numerical advantage didnt matter so much, the border between Russia and Poland was swamps, huge forests and rivers aka it was defensible, it was featured substantial defensive installations and Poland did have a milion men under arms unlike say Finnland.

But the border between Germany and Poland was flat, fertile grounds - perfect for invading. Poland also had a hell of an indefensible border with Germany. So - anyone with sense should have seen that the situation was hopeless in terms of traditional defence.

Thats obvious today, back then it was not obvious at all, especially since the treason was carried out via backstage agreements hidden from Poland.

What's not obvious about the Munich Agreement and the British apathy towards another war? All common, public knowledge at the time.

Against enemies willing to exterminate your nation? Got any more brilliant ideas to share with us?

Seemed to work fine for the Chinese against the Japanese in WWII. And - the sheer effort required to actually exterminate Poland by the Germans would have required manpower well in excess of what they actually had available. And yet again - I make the point that the Soviets would not have invaded a country that wasn't beaten. Stalin was a smart guy - he wouldn't commit considerable resources into fighting a guerilla war against Poland. He'd have done what he always did and simply wait for the best moment for him.

How?

By looking at a map and looking at who was unfriendly towards Poland. Lithuanians, Germans, Russians, Ukrainians and Czechoslovaks all hated Poles.

Right. Now ask the Lithuanians and Czechs what is their typical Polish view. Ukrainians had no army, if I may refresh your memory.

Their view is clouded by Poland's actions between 1919 and 1939. Or do you need reminding about the annexation of Lithuanian and Czech territory?

Ukrainians had no army, but can you imagine the UPA on the Polish side? Would've certainly helped a great deal to have some savage, brutal murderers on the Polish side with no care or worry about what they did.

(but alas, Poland lost that by betraying them)
delphiandomine   
13 Dec 2010
History / Tuchola in Poland - roots of Katyn? [220]

And how about through Germany, delph? But this would require actually engaging the Germans, hmm... seems you're right... impossible thing. For the Brits.

At that time, public opinion didn't support it. The leader of the country wasn't particularly bothered either. In fact, I wouldn't be shocked to discover that the British wanted the Germans and Soviets to murder each other senseless, leaving the UK alone. Not bothering to help Poland was almost certainly a result of people simply not wanting anything to do with helping some "far away country of which we know nothing".

:)) so giving up the indefensible part of Poland is 'being routed by Germans in a few days', but giving up the whole country is a good idea to you. And then we will show them our guerillas.

It certainly is an interesting "what-if" scenario - how would the disciplined Germans deal with wild Poles who think nothing about murdering anyone German? Poland would have been occupied in 2-3 days - but equally so, there would be a huge amount of people who were armed and trained, just waiting to murder the first Germans they see.

Do you really think that the Germans would have been strong enough mentally to deal with it? They would have been promised a swift, decisive victory - not a war in which they were fighting only what appears to be civilians.

I say they should've formed an alliance with Germany. And Mexico. Solomon Islands wouldn't be a bad choice neither. Or we could've attacked the USA in July and surrender the next day, unconditionally.

Ah, typical Polish view - "omg, how could we consider going into alliance with LITHUANIANS. And Czechoslovaks, no way! AND UKRAINIANS?! NO ******* WAY".

I'd say that Poland couldn't have done any worse in WWII.
delphiandomine   
13 Dec 2010
History / Tuchola in Poland - roots of Katyn? [220]

Thats because in the 20s and 30's Polands army was 3rd in Europe after France and Russia, Russia became competitive only by 1933 and Germany became on par with Poland in 1934.

But by 1939, Poland was way behind Germany. She also didn't have the numerical advantage of Russia.

As long as the industrial race didnt kick in Poland had an army that could reliably compete with any european power out there so whats your point?

Competing with one power isn't enough when you're surrounded by enemies - and even with the problem of enemies from within.

Again an idiotic statement by you that denotes that you're 2/3rds an ignorant idiot and 1/3rd a prejudiced anti-polish prick.

Are you denying that the whole "Western Betrayal" thing was propogated by the Communists? If so, it shows that you're just like many others - brainwashed by communism, even to the point of denial.

France had a straight and completely undefended road to Berlin (unless you count 200.000 troops with 300 artillery pieces between them as defence) and England never landed a single tank in France prior to BEF.

And? Poland shouldn't have relied on allies who frankly were far more interested in themselves than Poland. It hardly takes a genius to work out that after the Munich Agreement, the UK and France were more interested in leaving Germany to it than bothering to fight Germany.

Again an idiot talks, you know what would have happened? Germans and Russians would just exterminate all Poles, period.

You assume that the Russians would even want to invade a country where Germans were being killed indiscriminately with no clear army command to go after. Bear in mind that history shows guerilla warfare to be terribly effective in terms of causing havoc among the enemy.

The Russians only invaded once it was obvious that Poland had lost, anyway.

Why? France had every means of ending the war then and there' strategic sense dictated it would, no one expected France to betray Poland so unreasonably.

Strategic sense would have dictated looking at Poland's isolation and realising that the only country that could help Poland was Poland. I really, really, really cannot figure out why Poland placed so much emphasis on help on two countries that had previously shown mass indifference towards Poland and her independence.

For what it's worth, the whole "western betrayal" thing seems to be a big excuse for Poland's poor performance in WWII.