Poland needs to become a modern country
No. It would destroy Poland.
There was a time when the "West" itself wasn't actually modern, and one can say the west was modernism's first victim.
Human beings had it right before "science" and moderntardation. You just don't know what you don't know. The peasant who thought the sun was God knew more about "reality" than any astrophysicist.
To this, I would also add that part of the reason your so called "science" took the direction it did, away from the purely rational order the men of the Enlightenment were looking for, into this Babylonian pseudo-metaphysical mumbo jumbo about parallel dimensions, nothing being something other than nothing, all that assorted Quantum quackery, is that mankind needs the transcendent. Human beings need the infinite. By focusing entirely on material reality, while closing any pathway towards the place where real transcendence and actual infinity can be found, you forced people to try to fulfill this inner desire for things that are above contingency while being firmly imprisoned in a realm of pure contingency itself. The result is that people started to seek escape by cracking contingency apart, by piercing through the veil of "normality", reaching, not freedom, not expansion, but distortion and deviation. Not content with the natural world, you started to look in microscopes at the infinitely small, and in space for the infinitely vast, reveling in the intoxicating sense of vertigo generated by those ventures to the point now the simple observation of natural phenomena appears quaint and childish (this point was raised by Tarkovsky in Solaris). Science fiction was then created to fulfill the need to escape from "everyday" life into this realm of pseudo-infinity and pseudo-liberation. The same concept applies to art. Not content with the purely formalistic and all "too human" confines of "classical" art, you sought escape into pure essence, and thus again formlessness and distortion, hence modern art. And it just goes on and on like this. In the realm of sexuality, where you begun by braking free of mores and taboos, which, operating in a manner similar to a drug, led to more and more extreme experimentation (hence all the kiddie focking we see among the elites, who are at the vanguard of the effects of modernism, unlike the proles, whose stupidity actually works as a protection of sort. BTW, the same concept here applies to the development for a thirst for violence, sadism and graphic horror). And on and on like this. In every sphere of life, there comes this tendency to want to brake free, hence the desire to brake things apart, to disdain and subsequently seek to destroy everything that contains any trace of limitation. Everything becomes mired in this contorted esoterization of contingent phenomena. And of course, lastly, the primary effects of braking contingency apart is nothing other then multiplicity and quantity. That's really the driving force of modernity. Braking up contingency merely means creating ever more subdivisions, which then become their own elusive reward, for no matter how big the quantity, it is never enough, it is never quite close to true infinity, hence the push for ever more and more quantity. Hence also this obsession with extreme "complexity", which ironically also begets an opposite reaction into extreme simplicity to escape the confines of complexity and then back again into complexity as the need to escape the inescapable can only result in a viscous circle from which there is no escape.
And that, in a nutshell, is your precious modernity. And in a world that prides itself as having been able to "expand" and seek freedom from contingency but which in reality has only managed to create deviations and distortions coated in escapist fantasies, the simple life of an ancient, who was completely content with his few needs and with the natural world surrounding him, would appear incredibly backward and limiting, and the notion that such a "primitive" individual could possibly have a greater understanding of anything, let alone reality, would most certainly appear to be laughable. Except such a man did have a greater understanding of things, hence, why he did not seek to indulge and lead his civilization to the same type of extremes and abuses of physical reality that characterize this modern monstrosity all you demented faggots seem to be so proud of. The fact ancient peoples may have been naive and ignorant of certain "facts" of physical reality means absolutely nothing. What they had and what they knew was not worth losing to gain some dubious material advantage, which is really the only thing moderns can seem to offer, since modernity has nothing of value to provide except for brute dominion over matter.