Hitler was an Austrian that joined the German army, rather than the Austrian army, in WW1 because he didn't want to serve in an army containing such a high percentage of Slavs.
Rather because he admired Prussic Empire.
Indeed, threads like this one, that proport to give "answers" to questions involving massive counter-factuals, may be interesting to read but these answers have absolutely no historical value. History is about what actually happened and no one can claim to know the truth about how WW2 would've turned out if the titular counter-factual had actually happened.
That is obviously what if qestion and none is pretending otherwise.
Although that could be interesting as a means to find out rationale behind Poland decision to refute German offer of alliance. So far it seems like a mistake.
It is even more pressing that you know as Poland at the moment is in fact German close "partner" not to say "younger partner". Question:
Was all those sacrifices and looses including lost of half of Polish territory and then 46 years of Soviet occupation were all for nought as Poland is back in the square one and in close relationship with Germany.
True but we can only wonder how it would look like if he won the war.
well would he won or would he just destroyed Soviets? that is the qestion for which there is no answer.
Only suggestion that given more time the western powers and the USA would have to really put their back into it and win the war in fact.