Return PolishForums LIVE
  PolishForums Archive :
Posts by Babinich  

Joined: 26 May 2008 / Male ♂
Last Post: 4 Mar 2014
Threads: Total: 1 / In This Archive: 1
Posts: Total: 455 / In This Archive: 246
From: Chicago
Speaks Polish?: not quite yet...
Interests: Math, history, science, economics, & hockey

Displayed posts: 247 / page 8 of 9
sort: Oldest first   Latest first   |
Babinich   
4 Sep 2009
News / Poland Remembers start of WW2 [200]

In the West, in 1939/40 they used little more than their middle finger and the British ran very fast back home across the channel.

I disagree...

* German armored strength May 10 1940: 2439 battle tanks, of which 349 Panzer III and 278 Panzer IV.
* Allied armored strength May 10 1940: 4204 battle tanks including 300 Somua and 274 Char B.
---
* Allied Airforce in continental Europe: 4,469 of which at the front: 1,453
* German Luftwaffe: 3,578 of which at the front 2,589 (w/material advantage)
---
* Germany deployed about three million men for the battle.
* Because of a low birthrate, which had even further declined during the First World War, France had a severe manpower shortage relative to its total population, which furthermore was barely half that of Germany. To compensate, France had mobilised about a third of the male population between the ages of 20 and 45, bringing the strength of its armed forces to over six million men, more than the entire German Wehrmacht of 5.4 million. Only 2.2 million of these served in army units in the north, though the total there was brought to over 3.3 million by the British, Belgian and Dutch forces.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_France

To Lose a Battle: France 1940 - Sir Alistair Horne
Babinich   
5 Sep 2009
News / Poland Remembers start of WW2 [200]

When a outnumbered attacking force runs over a bigger army and their whole country in 6 weeks you can call that either "middle finger" or the most humiliating defeat of an army ever!

Shkop,

Bagration - the death of Army Group Center was a greater defeat.

The Germans lost 450K men and AGC's strength fell from 880K to 445K. Another 100K fell in secondary battles (AGS Ukraine). The Soviets lost 178.5K killed and 587K wounded. The Soviets lost 2957 tanks & self propelled guns & 2447 guns and mortars.

Despite these losses the Soviets increased their troop levels from 6,394,500 in March 1944 to 6,500,00 in late fall of 1944. The Germans and it allies lost troops: from 2,460,000 in June of 1944 to 2,030,000 by Nov 1944.

Soviet material for tanks and self propelled went from 7753 on June 1 to 8,300 by Jan 1945. German gains for the same equipment went from 2608 on June 1944 to 3700 by Nov 1944. Over the same time frame Soviet artillery went from 100K to 114K; German artillery decreased from 7080 in June 1944 to 5700 in Nov 1944.
Babinich   
5 Sep 2009
News / Poland Remembers start of WW2 [200]

There is nothing humiliating about that defeat...the Germans made them pay! Every german stubblehopper, tanker, pilot inflicted much more damage to the enemy than the other way around.
What a "walk over" for the Soviets, yeah right...

Shkop,

The annihilation of AGC was total. The repercussions of this defeat were immeasurable. From this point forward the corrupt Nazi hierarchy went into meltdown. Martin Bormann's orders to the SS to arrest army officer because of his feeling that the General Staff aligned itself with the Moscow Free Germany Committee. Jodl proposed the German General Staff be abolished.

Hitler, now believing that a shock blow to one of the allied fronts would save Germany, wasted men and material in the Ardennes in what was called the Battle of the Bulge.

The Bulge, from the German perspective, was a waste of men and material.

The Nazi leadership disintegrated. Political infighting increased, and Hitler's optimism after Bagration (he thought it was a net positive because the front was shortened) was nothing more that wild-eyed fantasy.

Ironic, German generals had argued for shortening the front in the spring of 1944. For their arguments Manstein, Hoth, and Kleist were dismissed.

This was a total collapse; to argue any other point is foolish.
Babinich   
11 Sep 2009
News / Poland Remembers start of WW2 [200]

If the French had fighted like the Wehrmacht in Russia, inflicting 3times the casualties inspite of being hugely outnumbered in men and material (what the french weren't!) the war would had found a quick end then already....

What are you talking about? Comparing the eastern and western fronts are apples and oranges.

Bagration caught the Germans unprepared and confused. Bagration left the east wide open to the Soviets.

You can quote all the numbers you want. The reality of the matter was that Bagration left no doubt that the Soviet could do whatever it wanted as it marched west into Prussia and Germany.

Everybody fighted and won/lost but did fight well...but the French that is.

Quit promoting the myth that the French just left their weapons and ran to London/Vichy. There are many examples where the French inflicted tremendous causalities on the overconfident Germans.

To Lose A Battle: France 1940 - Sir Alistair Horne
Babinich   
14 Sep 2009
News / Death Sentence in Poland, when was it abolished? Last executed? [26]

More effective would be indeed lifelong imprisonment. May cost society something, but at least you get the benefit that the perpetrator gets to be confronted with himself and the deed he has done for the rest of his life.

How do you know the offender embraces contrition?
Babinich   
22 Sep 2009
News / The most spectacular errors in Polish politics. [264]

Refusal to enter into some negotiation with the Germans over issues involving Czechoslovakia and the Danzig area were big mistakes

Sorry, but treaties with arch criminals are not worth the paper they're written on.
Babinich   
15 Oct 2009
USA, Canada / SHOULD WE POL-AMS BE ASHAMED OF AMERICA? [24]

If you want to be ashamed about America be ashamed at the lack of competence in the people running the country.

powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/10/024710.php
Babinich   
17 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

Poland is capable of defending itself and should build their own defense systems. After all, why on God's green earth would you trust this administration with your safety when it has people like this in its midst: powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/10/024720.php

I bet not one of those idiots even know what its really used for

Are you talking about Poles or a certain Chicago north side baseball club? :')
Babinich   
18 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

Russia would overrun Poland without too much difficulty.

Would that action be tolerated by the EU?
Babinich   
18 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

Are you saying Eurofor & the European Union Battlegroup cannot act as a counterweight to Russia?
Babinich   
18 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

Of course I am serious. I know that in such a situation the bat phone would ring and help would be requested.

My point is that the Poles should depend on no one other than themselves for their defense. The old adage of "there is strength in numbers" should be pursued.
Babinich   
18 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

What? You don't want to provide that help again.. and PAY for it as well! For shame!

If it were up to me the US would withdraw from NATO.
Babinich   
18 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

I realize that the current administration will not get out of NATO. What you're seeing is what I would do if I were in power.
Babinich   
19 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

Who cares if they peak around?

I do...

This is a show of weakness of epic proportions.

I get this feeling that America and Russia will partner more in the future.

I get the feeling the US & China will partner more in the future.
Babinich   
20 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

US and China won't exactly "partner". More like China will own the US and take all the money.

Please describe how you see this scenario of yours becoming reality.
Babinich   
20 Oct 2009
News / NEW PATRIOT MISSILES FOR POLAND [178]

oh, that could be the start of another thread entirely :D

How about a tease?

*yawn* and where's the EU, sire?

Scrappy, the EU was here on negotiating Iran's uranium enrichment. Where was our shrewd negotiating genius, you know, the guy occupying the White House?

powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/10/024745.php
Babinich   
26 Oct 2009
History / The Battle of Vienna - Poland helped save Europe [57]

Nobody has really shown how Europe was saved, I'm not convinced so far.

The Russians defeated the creme of the Deutsches Heer and the western allies, primarily the US, bombed the axis into oblivion.

Just because it had been Poland suffering during the last centuries from their weakness compared to their neighbours that doesn't make these neighbours the ultimate devil incarnate!

Stalin & Hitler: the devil shroud in mortal coil.
Babinich   
1 Nov 2009
News / Slavic linguistic union inside of EU; Polish language official [95]

I suggest particulary Polish as official in Slavic lingustic union, considering that Poland represent biggest Slavic country in EU. After all, ancient Polish linguistic area reached territories from Baltic to Balkan.

Sorry, but I have to disagree with you moj brat.

Keep the slavs free and independent...

Let the slavic nation states speak in their own tongue.
Babinich   
18 Nov 2009
History / What would Europe look like with Polish-Lithuanian-Ukrainian Commonwealth today [209]

Certainly not free. Ireland is the only country in the EU to hold a referendum on the treaty, as required by their constitution. Every other member state can ratify the treaty by a vote in their national parliament. As such, we hold responsibility for supporting or rejecting the treaty on behalf of about 490 million Europeans who do not have the option to vote.
Babinich   
23 Nov 2009
History / The Poms who stood by the Poles in WW2 [156]

There were a number of British politicians that voiced their opinion of aggressive support early in the war.

As was mentioned in a previous post, Hitler had an affinity for the Empire.