So no abortions whatsoever even if the mother's life is in danger?
You see you have asked a question. I will pretend it wasn't a rhetorical one. A Happy day for you as you might learn something/.
There is not a clear cut choice an abortion or mother die. In reality it means that any treatment would be deadly to a child.
In 99,9% cases the choice is between treatment for a woman and dead kid or let her die eventually just to save a kid.
In all those 99,9% cases and also in 0,1% cases where an abortion would be recommended to save mothers life the choice of course belongs to her, a woman, mother.
By all means, There is no inconsistency here. That is just quite obvious.
I just despair about the state of mind of all those people who have that genuine need to ask about it. Are you people mental or you are so deep in the rabbit hole of your own lost soul that you don't even know anything anymore?
The court which is under rightard control
Well that the way it rolls, one there is more left leaning people other time there is more right leaning people. What is important is the fact that regardless of their differences they seem to agree on that ruling. As i said the ruling is consistent. It means it is not U-turn, it means it doesn't go against previous rulings.
You just seems to be lost and do not know how that stuff works.
Face facts and reality and stop stumping your feet and cry like a toddler. It is not only boring but it is also dumb.