The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Home / News  % width   posts: 122

Should Poland made an energy bridge deal with Russia?


Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #61
Come on people we are part of a union for a reason and energy is a good start :)

Why are you so against it that countries organize their energy directly...here between Germany and Russia? You should know by know that we made some bad experiences with having to many middle men...

You seem nothing to have against german dependency on instable middle men regarding it's energy security, why is that?
convex  20 | 3928
5 Apr 2010   #62
Well, Germany is one of the biggest pushers to block nuclear energy as a source of power in many countries...
nomaderol  5 | 726
5 Apr 2010   #63
So it's not a socialist paradise?

A small country like Turkmenistan will show such a big character by tring to give their folks free energy, free hospital, etc and the big West will show characterless behaviours by stirring the policies and you will prove socialism is not paradise? Of course, the life is not paradise. But, being against the free energy, free hospital, etc as an ordinary folk like you can be considered as idiot fool only.. West is already in marsh. Economy is sinking badly in the west and you still are against free hospital etc? Idiot, fool.. If Turkmenistan isnt so successful, do it better.. No, you ordinary folks of west are so fool that you love to stay in marsh. Economy sinking.. Enjoy sinking.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #64
Well, Germany is one of the biggest pushers to block nuclear energy as a source of power in many countries...

Well, Germany is rethinking that policy right now...
SeanBM  34 | 5781
5 Apr 2010   #65
Why are you so against it that countries organize their energy directly.

European Union countries rely heavily on Russian energy:

The EU currently imports 82% of its oil and 57% of its gas, making it the world's leading importer of these fuels.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_policy_of_the_European_Union

I am for a European Union doing business together showing a united front. Russia, China, America a few other big players... a divided Europe is not going to be good for any of us.

It is not about Germany being independent but about the E.U. being a bigger stronger force in the world.
nomaderol  5 | 726
5 Apr 2010   #66
European Union countries rely heavily on Russian energy:

Russia is trader only. They export their small amount of their energy as they consume most of energy in Russia. EU heavily rely on Turkmenistan and Algeria gases as these are importan sources and exporters.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #67
I am for a European Union doing business together showing a united front.

Again...come out with an exact scenario please...to do what exactly as an united front???

It is not about Germany being independent but about the E.U. being a bigger stronger force in the world.

Again, great words...but we still need our daily energy in the mean time.

Russia has it - we need it! Other countries tried to abuse german/european dependency on those pipelines going over their soil...tried to use it as a leverage in spats with Russians...ergo Germany decides to diversify their sources.
SeanBM  34 | 5781
5 Apr 2010   #68
Again, great words...but we still need our daily energy in the mean time.

Looks like the E.U. have been trying:
External energy relations
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_policy_of_the_European_Union#External_energy_relations

Again...come out with an exact scenario please...to do what exactly as an united front???

Having a pipeline that does not pass through third parties but is kept in the E.U.
I have already said a more stable supply without price hikes.

but we still need our daily energy in the mean time.

Do you not think that our E.U. should be unified on it's over dependency on Russian energy, we are all having the same problem, why are you against solving it together?
convex  20 | 3928
5 Apr 2010   #69
being against the free energy, free hospital, etc as an ordinary folk like you can be considered as idiot fool only..

They closed all the hospitals in the country side, they're not investing in infrastructure to actually get the free energy to their people, and they're taking away people's pensions. It's a nightmare down there. And a huge shame considering how resource rich the country is.

Russia is trader only

You're right here. Gazprom is a middle man. Sell off the Turkmen gas and then sell the Russian gas once supplies get tight. Smart.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #70
Do you not think that our E.U. should be unified on it's over dependency on Russian energy, we are all having the same problem, why are you against solving it together?

How?
Who else can supply the EU with the needed energy?
I'm not against solving the problem but I ask you desperatedly for an alternative....you have no idea either, right?

The only real alternative are projects like desertec...but that will need some years...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desertec
SeanBM  34 | 5781
5 Apr 2010   #71
* Locking in Demand - Moscow is attempting to use long-term contracts with European countries to lock in demand. By dealing separately with countries rather than as a group, Moscow can discriminate countries on prices.
* Locking in Supply - Moscow attempts to consolidate its control of strategic energy infrastructure throughout Europe and Eurasia, including supply, sale, and distribution of natural gas as well as as pipelines, refineries, electric grids, and ports.
* Derailing Competition - For example, Moscow has pushed South Stream which competes against the EU's Nabucco pipeline as well as the proposed extension of the EU-backed South Caucasus Pipeline.

Russian strategy and tactics for Europe
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe%27s_energy_dependence_on_Russia#Russian_strategy_and_tactics
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #72
Again...your alternative would be? Come on Seanie...gimme some meat!!!

The pragmatic me thinks till we are getting independent from fossil resources at all those countries who have the stuff will be always profit from it where countries without much resources like Germany will always be dependent....
nomaderol  5 | 726
5 Apr 2010   #73
Convex, you live in the West? You want free energy, free hospital, etc as one in ordinary folk? You are critizising Turkmenistan, a small country open to games of Russia, West, etc about not being very successful in these giving free energy, free hospital, etc.? Then, West is doing the worse. Do it better than Turkmenistan. But, no, western ordinary folks are so fool idiots or so stupids that they can't do even a free hospital thing (see hard discussions against obamas new health care in usa). Look at yourselves first before critisizing Turkmenistan. West is in sh*t marsh and they are belittleing Turkmenistan. Pity you!
SeanBM  34 | 5781
5 Apr 2010   #74
Who else can supply the EU with the needed energy?

I am not suggesting that we stop our business with Russia.
I am saying that divided we are weaker, much weaker.

Supply and demand, if we are united one on one with Russia for gas we have more pulling power. Russia also needs to sell.

Again...your alternative would be? Come on Seanie...gimme some meat!!!

We could all live in windmills :)

Again I am not suggesting not doing business with Russia but a true European Union would benefit from a united front, a steady supply and no price hikes.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #75
Then, West is doing the worse. Do it better than Turkmenistan.

Erm...not really hard to to:
/wiki/Turkmenistan#Human_rights

...
According to the 2007 Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index, Turkmenistan had the third-worst restrictions on the freedom of the press in the world.
Former president Saparmurat Niyazov enforced a ban on satellite dishes[14] and also banned beards, long hair, ballet, opera and recorded music in Turkmenistan.[15] These restrictions are now being gradually relaxed by the new president Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow. Although there were modest improvements, the government continued to commit serious abuses, and its human rights record remained poor.[16]

Sounds like a creep country!
convex  20 | 3928
5 Apr 2010   #76
You are critizising Turkmenistan, a small country open to games of Russia, West, etc

Turkmenistan, which by all means should be a ridiculously rich country, does a worse job at keeping its people alive than Western governments.

At least in the West we get a chance to get the things that we want and need, as opposed to the situation in most dictatorships where the people are at the whims of the government to either bless them or let them suffer. I'll take free choice, thanks.
time means  5 | 1309
5 Apr 2010   #77
Sounds like a creep country!

He should fit in well there then.
convex  20 | 3928
5 Apr 2010   #78
Yes my suggestion is exactly the same as before when North Korea was held up as a great model. Just go experience it for a while (just don't complain about it when you get there! seriously, you'll get thrown in the klink).
SeanBM  34 | 5781
5 Apr 2010   #79
banned beards, long hair, ballet, opera and recorded music in Turkmenistan

What??? That is screwy.
nomaderol  5 | 726
5 Apr 2010   #81
I'll take free choice, thanks.

Free choice? Freedom? West? LoL !

Look. Your so called democracies are under control of a rich minority only. Ask your all politicians. Why do they tell so much lie and give up their words during elections? Simple. You select someones and then a rich control them. Look at a factory in West. There is an owner. Owner chose a president/ceo. Ceo choses directors. Directors chose managers. Managers chose workers and employees. Employee vote for president/ceo? In country, you think so. Eh, you always think wrong. Eh, this is why West is sinking economically. You need another war? LoL. Yes, you have freedom. You can push nuke buttons. Your only freedom is this freedom.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #82
We don't shoot you for stating your opinion! ;)
Crow  154 | 9314
5 Apr 2010   #83
Should Poland made an energy bridge deal with Russia?

of course
time means  5 | 1309
5 Apr 2010   #84
We don't shoot you for stating your opinion! ;)

Could we not make him the exception?
Torq
5 Apr 2010   #85
banned beards (...) ballet, opera (...) in Turkmenistan

At least in Turkmenistan these things are banned - hopefully the rest of the world will follow
their example! :D
convex  20 | 3928
5 Apr 2010   #86
Ask your all politicians. Why do they tell so much lie and give up their words during elections?

Dunno, at least we have the option of saying "hey, you're stealing from us!" without being thrown in jail. Turkmen don't have that option. They have to take it.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11820
5 Apr 2010   #87
hopefully the rest of the world will follow their example! :D

You know how they say..."First they came for the beards, then they came for the ballet and opera stuff and as they came for my helmet there was nobody there anymore"...or so...
nomaderol  5 | 726
5 Apr 2010   #88
Dunno, at least we have the option of saying "hey, you're stealing from us!" without being thrown in jail.

Saying, but, getting nothing. If you try to get, you are kicked out of company or out of life in the West.
Torq
5 Apr 2010   #89
"First they came for the beards, then they came for the ballet and opera stuff and as they came for my helmet there was nobody there anymore"

Yeah - they also said "I don't agree with your love of ballet and opera but I would
give my life to guarantee you the right to express it" :-)

Ah, well - can we at least ban wearing baseball caps back-to-front?
convex  20 | 3928
5 Apr 2010   #90
Saying, but, getting nothing. If you try to get, you are kicked out of company or out of life in the West.

Getting nothing is better than getting tossed in jail and having all your belongings taken from you by your friendly local government authorities.


Home / News / Should Poland made an energy bridge deal with Russia?

Please login to post here!