Stalin, Hitler
Hitler's figure is complex and contradictory. But Hitler came to power legally, unlike the Communists in Russia. Hitler was supported by the greater part of the German people. Not only was Hitler an ingenious orator, but overall he possessed unique personal qualities. Hitler was a very well read man and had a good understanding of history. In addition, when he wrote «Mein Kampf» in the year 1924, he was confronted by a figure of Russia, which had been eaten and nibbled to the bone by Jews. So Hitler had a great grasp of the essence of jewish games. The experience of Russia was before his very eyes.
Yet, had it not been for Hitler and World War II, the Russian people would no longer exist. Hitler forced world Zionism to weaken the rope around the neck of the Russian people. Initially, Hitler and Stalin made friends and made common plans. But the backstage was able to seduce Hitler and Stalin and start World War II. Thanks to that war, the Wall Street bankers in the United States made a huge amount of money.
One should not bother and make Hitler the figure of the ideal hero, but for the sake of justice, some comparisons of the red regime with the grey one can be made. The Communists lost the elections in Russia and seized power by force. Hitler won the election and came to power in Germany quite legitimately. The Communists hated the Russian people, and the Russian people hated the Communists. The Communists had to wage a long civil war and deal with the most terrible genocide of the Russian people until they succeeded in turning the Russian people into Soviet «people». Hitler loved the German people, and the Germans loved Hitler. Hitler was supported by 95% of the German population. Hitler did not wage any civil wars against the Germans or deal with the German genocide.
The phenomenon of Hitler's Nazism did not originate in an empty place and was the result of a concrete historical process. Note that in the emergence of the ideology of Hitler's Nazism a major role was played by Polish emigration (Friedrich Nietzsche). Information about what Hitler's Nazism really represents was closed in the USSR. Already, this leads to the idea that Hitler's ideology is not as stupid as they portray it. Hitler's ideology can be acknowledged or denied, loved or hated. But every smart person realizes that fascist ideology cannot be destroyed by force, it needs to be broken ideally. And since they can't break it down ideally and simply forbid it, it immediately confirms the strength of that ideology. That is why all the jewish cries for the destruction of »fascism«, concealed by false slogans such as the struggle for »democracy«, can provoke nothing but abhorrence in a thinking man.
Imagine the situation. The peoples of the USSR lost over 20 million inhabitants in World War II. Lost in the battle with Hitler and his ideology. And what is this ideology? In the fight against what kind of ideology have nations lost tens of millions of people? Where could they get to know this ideology? In which stores did the USSR sell Hitler's book »My Struggle«? Not in any. Not only could this ideology not be known. For the very attempt to get to know it, the man was automatically imprisoned in the USSR. All attempts to find out the truth, to find out what the Soviet people were fighting for and against were banned and severely punished. The Soviet man was an absolute slave and had no right to know anything. He didn't even have the right to ask questions. He was sent to war, and he had no right to know what and against who he was fighting. Stalin and his successors did not allow the Soviet people to know the simple truth that Hitler had fought against the Jews and that the Soviet people had fought on the side of the Jews. And that's all true, as simple as 2 x 2.
Today in Germany, where is allegedly a democracy, and in fact it is a jewdocracy, Hitler's book is banned. And that is your freedom of speech. In USA, Hitler's book is allowed. Republicans are pressing the tail of the Jews and not letting them to completely stifle the freedom of speech. In the USSR, people were fed cheap jewish propaganda, the most primitive of all Soviet-era demagogy. Hitler was portrayed as an idiot, mentally ill, Germans as miserable scarecrows, and Soviet warriors as rarely brave fighters, who themselves defeat a hundred Germans. Yet this jewish propaganda by no means explained how these miserable, idiot-led scarecrows conquered half of Russia and reached until Moscow. All the Soviet films that brought to life this propaganda did not fit into real reality. The first Soviet film to feature the objective elements of Hitler's Nazism was the movie Seventeen Moments of War. The Soviet people saw that the leaders of the Third Reich were not at all foolish, but powerful and strong figures. Although Hitler's figure was virtually absent in that film and it did not portray the ideology of Nazism, the success of the film was astounding. To date, there is virtually no objective information about Hitler and Nazism in Russia. There is a mass of cheap jewish falsifications.
In general, when mud is poured on Hitler, it makes sense to think and discuss a little. Let's take a look at our life experience. Probably everyone was dealing with people's conflicts. For example, you are analyzing a couple's conflict. You listen to one side, - one picture turns out, you listen to the other side - the picture is completely different. And only after hearing both sides can you form an objective opinion. If they convict someone in advance and do not justify him, then it is not a court but a judgement. When and where did we listen on television, on the radio, in other MSM protectors of Hitler? When and where? Never and nowhere. Doesn't that say anything? That says a lot. Doesn't that say that those in power fear Hitler's protector as a fire. Why are they afraid? That means there is truth and strength on the side of the protector of Hitler. No one is afraid of lies and weaknesses. Turn on today's American or British television (Judeovision), where some pitiful commentators brandish someone angrily. And do they give a word to those who they brand as (fascists, extremists, nationalists, etc.)? No. Is that not a court? Is it a democracy? No - it's a jewdocracy.
Official historians completely falsify the causes of both World War II and World War I. The most important thing is to understand one thing: not all revolutions, and not all wars are due to some objective causes. Wars and revolutions - these are the means of remodeling the world at the hands of the worldwide jewish-masonic mafia and their occult masters. Who was Hitler fighting against? Against the Communist (Zionist) USSR, against the Zionist USA and Zionist England. Hitler did not want to make war against England, but to his detriment (and to the unluckiness of the English) came to power Winston Churchill, who was in a strong personal financial dependence on jewish financiers and pursued policies in favor of world Zionism. Many historians have written about it, especially David Irving. That is, Hitler fought against world Zionism. This should never be forgotten. There is a version that Hitler was ¼ a Jew. It may be so, but that doesn't change anything in Hitler's view of the world and his behavior. For the Jews of the whole world, Hitler is - enemy number one. And the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition (including the Stalinist USSR) - the main protectors of Jewry.
