I think you don't understand what PolAm what to say, as he is a poor communicator, or hasn't even formulated it in his mind and is groping in the dark for the right words to express his half-formed thoughts.
I try to be a self-appointed spokesperson for the dude because I feel sorry for him as you pile on him with everything every time he posts.
He is saying that the economy and demography make it certain that Ukraine will lose to Russia in the war of attrition because Russia can take more punishment than Ukraine and still fight.
So PolAm thinks that while the US backs up Ukraine, it is high time for Ukraine to cut its losses and to come to some peaceful accommodation with Russia.
Even if that would be only a temporary solution, and even if it means losing half of the territory to Russia.
All is better because the US won't be supporting Ukraine indefinitely.
As Ukraine on its own, even if it keeps fighting for another three years or even six, will lose to Russia.
The above is an argument PolAm would make if he knew how.
I hope I moved this argument forward, and we won't go back to this childish back-and-forth without really addressing the crux of the matter.
I try to be a self-appointed spokesperson for the dude because I feel sorry for him as you pile on him with everything every time he posts.
He is saying that the economy and demography make it certain that Ukraine will lose to Russia in the war of attrition because Russia can take more punishment than Ukraine and still fight.
So PolAm thinks that while the US backs up Ukraine, it is high time for Ukraine to cut its losses and to come to some peaceful accommodation with Russia.
Even if that would be only a temporary solution, and even if it means losing half of the territory to Russia.
All is better because the US won't be supporting Ukraine indefinitely.
As Ukraine on its own, even if it keeps fighting for another three years or even six, will lose to Russia.
The above is an argument PolAm would make if he knew how.
I hope I moved this argument forward, and we won't go back to this childish back-and-forth without really addressing the crux of the matter.