The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Home / News  % width posts: 2,699

Poland`s aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 10


Torq 7 | 808
26 Apr 2024 #1,981
a) mean external control in political and military sphere

Only to some extent. Please tell me who do you think controls Poland. The EU? Ask in Berlin and Brussels how "controllable" is Poland :) The USA? The same thing - they are our important ally but we are hardly "controlled" by them.

instead of becoming someone's else "torpedo with nuclear warhead"

Why would we even want that? Having nuclear weapons would allow us to tell everyone to f*ck off and become independent from any external influence. Isn't that what Russians want - neutral Poland as a buffer between NATO and Russia? Well, in such case you should give us the nukes yourselves. Otherwise we are stuck with NATO.

c) that would mean first become neutral and then get nukes

Yeah, the problem with that option is that when a country is in no military alliance and doesn't have nukes, then some people may get strange ideas about demilitarising and denazifying it. ;)
Velund 1 | 663
26 Apr 2024 #1,982
Yeah, the problem

The problem that Poland is on hook, and have no real way to get completely free and sovereign again. ;)

Optionally - Poland is too small to afford real sovereignity in a modern world...
Torq 7 | 808
26 Apr 2024 #1,983
have no real way to get completely free and sovereign again.

Hold our beer. We are getting those nukes and then we are telling everyone to f*ck off; maybe in a more diplomatic language (maybe).

Poland is too small

Hey, we are richer than Taiwan, bigger than Italy and more populous than Canada.
Velund 1 | 663
26 Apr 2024 #1,984
Why would we even want that?

While your key top politicians is on hook, nobody cares what you want. ;)
Torq 7 | 808
26 Apr 2024 #1,985
your key top politicians is on hook

Our key top politicians are ascetic monks compared to your gold toilet sh*tters!

They are like Pawian - they may have their small shady businesses but first and foremost they love Poland. :)
Velund 1 | 663
26 Apr 2024 #1,986
Our key top politicians are ascetic monks

I cannot say more that was said by Orban in their speech at Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).

It was really funny to read about "small shady businnesses" of "greens" after Orban speech... My apologies to Germans...



Torq 7 | 808
26 Apr 2024 #1,987
"greens"

You want to complain about the "greens" (reds more like)? They are your agents--you train them, you pay them, complain to yourselves. ;)
Velund 1 | 663
26 Apr 2024 #1,988
They are your agents

How convenient... Any shithead here - blame Putin and nobody will be able to complain.

BTW: Why greens fails to work for Russia then?
Torq 7 | 808
26 Apr 2024 #1,989
Why greens fails to work for Russia then?

Of course they work for Russia, at least in Poland - always trying to torpedo energy independence investments, nuclear plants, coal mining, Vistula Spit excavation etc., but they never protested against Nord Stream, for example.

Greens are Putin's lapdogs.
cms neuf 1 | 1,837
26 Apr 2024 #1,990
theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/26/man-charged-conducting-hostile-activity-uk-benefit-russia

North Nigerian sabotage squad caught in UK. Of course they are drunken amateurs and loners but that's about all the Orcs can afford these days
Mr Grunwald 32 | 2,195
26 Apr 2024 #1,991
Well, in such case you should give us the nukes yourselves

That would be something called: "A pro-gamer move"
At the levels of Joseph Stalin statehood&intrigue

It would force Poland to have cordial relations with Russia, and limit western influence drastically. Too much of a good bite to not try and chew it.

Alas I don't think leadership in Russia trusts any ex-Warsaw block members enough to even consider it. Poland hopes for nuclear bases, if Russia would offer Poland some few of her own nukes that she can easily shoot down. It would be a gesture of huge magnitude. It would shake the political scene in Poland.

First reaction would be shock or disbelief, most Polish politicians would see it as unbelievable or a provocation. So it would have to be handled with tact
AntV 5 | 694
26 Apr 2024 #1,992
Is anyone in Europe talking about the problems Ukraine is having with finding able-bodied soldiers?

Just recently Ukraine's desire to call up 500,000 men has been drastically reduced. Some analysts believe Ukraine would have trouble fielding an additional 50,000.

Zelensky has even gone as far as proposing the allowance of convicts and criminals. I recall when Russia did that, PF lambasted Putin and called Russia desperate.

Is the mood changing in Europe regarding goals in Ukraine? Is the prevailing position to drive out Russia from all of Ukraine? Or has that changed in light of Ukraine being meat grinder that appears desperate to find men to fight for the cause of a Russia-free Ukraine?
Ironside 52 | 12,477
26 Apr 2024 #1,993
Why Ukraine doesn't make munitions and depends on western aid. Enough time has passed to start production of their own.
cms neuf 1 | 1,837
26 Apr 2024 #1,994
They are making a lot of drones and using them effectively - some of you seem obsessed with the idea that they should be using world war 1 tactics of aimless artillery and suicidal infantry charges
Torq 7 | 808
26 Apr 2024 #1,995
it would force Poland to have cordial relations with Russia, and limit western influence drastically.

Definitely.

I have been saying this for ages. Poland should ally herself to whomever helps us acquire nuclear weapons, as it is indispensable for our survival.

If it's Russia then it's Russia, if it's the US it's the US. If they won't, it means they want a vassal not an ally. In such case we have to develop what we need ourselves and go neutral.
OP Bratwurst Boy 10 | 11,779
26 Apr 2024 #1,996
If it's Russia then it's Russia, if it's the US it's the US.

Hmm....the US has the NATO....that means also a kind of a nuclear umbrella as an argument for the worst case....the famous Article 5.

And I find it hard to imagine Putin nodding at a nuke-Poland....without any other arguments going for him.
Torq 7 | 808
26 Apr 2024 #1,997
NATO....that means also a kind of a nuclear umbrella

Do you really believe the US will risk an all out nuclear war with Russia if they drop a nuke or two on Poland (or Germany for that matter)?
Bobko 25 | 2,178
26 Apr 2024 #1,998
call up 500,000 men has been drastically reduced. Some analysts believe Ukraine would have trouble fielding an additional 50,000.

Calling up an additional 500,000 men, results in approx. $2-3B in additional monthly expenditures for the Ukrainian budget.

That is, potentially $36B a year. Perhaps more, since the UA government has been increasing bonuses for frontline duty.

The current aid packages are enough to fund Ukraine's budget for a year or more, but if mobilization kicked off on that scale - Ukraine would urgently need more funds.

Zelensky and his hapless chief commander have come up with some funny excuses for why they no longer want to raise 500K men. Their main argument now, is that following some magical "audit", they discovered hundreds of thousands of soldiers that have never been to the front.

The real problems, of course, are that:

1) No same person in Ukraine wants to join the army. It is a one way ticket, and tantamount to suicide - since there is still no law regarding demobilization.

2) They have alienated the entirety of the diaspora and refugees through their recent draconian laws that make those people second class citizens unless they enlist.

3) They have no money to pay these people

4) They do not have enough kit to equip these people with.

Even Russia could not easily stand up 500,000 men. America would struggle. Probably China would find it difficult.

How on Earth is Ukraine supposed to do it, with a $60B package supposed to last years?
Tacitus 2 | 1,379
26 Apr 2024 #1,999
@Ironside

Why Ukraine doesn't make munitions

They are, but building those factories takes time, even if your country is not actively bombarded.

english.nv.ua/business/rheinmetall-to-build-at-least-four-manufacturing-facilities-in-ukraine-50401282.html
Bobko 25 | 2,178
26 Apr 2024 #2,000
@Tacitus

Tacitus, father of history, tell us - what happens to a country at war when it runs out of money and manpower?

With a name like that, you should be able to tell us at least something?
AntV 5 | 694
26 Apr 2024 #2,001
How on Earth is Ukraine supposed to do it, with a $60B package supposed to last years?

Good question.

But, it seems to be moot, as the Ukes can't get even a fraction of that into uniform.

Therefore, I wonder if the focus has shifted in Europe on what the goals of Ukraine should be. Do we keep the meat grinder open by supporting Ukraine's goal of pushing Russia completely out or do we tell Zelensky and the boys it's time to move the goal posts?
Bobko 25 | 2,178
26 Apr 2024 #2,002
Do we keep the meat grinder open

Honestly, that's what all those bright people from good families are clapping for, and patting each other on the back for.

Maybe they don't understand it, and that's probably better for my sanity and belief in the good of this world.

But... end of the day - that's exactly what Mike Johnson, et al, have done.

They killed another several hundred thousand people. Great job for such a spiritual person!
AntV 5 | 694
26 Apr 2024 #2,003
@Bobko

But, lest us not forget that Russian aggression opened the meat grinder in the first place. While I may have a certain intellectual empathy for Russian concerns of Ukraine chumming up with the West, there is no moral justification for having opened up the meat grinder.

If there was any indication that the goal was for Ukraine to force Russia to the negotiation table with the aim to get realistic concessions from both sides , I'd be all for arming Ukraine to the teeth. But, that's not happening...ao the meat grinder continues to grind and grind.
Bobko 25 | 2,178
26 Apr 2024 #2,004
But, lest us not forget that Russian aggression opened the meat grinder in the first place.

Fair enough, but even at the market there are two people: the seller and the buyer.

It is the same here. Many, many things could have been done after the initial aggression, that would have minimized 100-fold the bloodshed which has occurred.

I'm not arguing that every soldier should have laid down their arms and let us parade around Kiev. But there were other alternatives to what is happening now, which you correctly describe as a meat grinder.
AntV 5 | 694
26 Apr 2024 #2,005
But there were other alternatives to what is happening

Agreed. Russia had control over some of those alternatives, though. Putin was unwilling to surrender his goal, as Zelensky and his syndicate are unwilling to do now.
Tacitus 2 | 1,379
26 Apr 2024 #2,006
But there were other alternatives to what is happening now, which you correctly describe as a meat grinder.

Russia has the chance to end this war at any moment. All it needs to do is to withdraw from Ukraine.
Novichok 4 | 8,324
26 Apr 2024 #2,007
Let me educate you, morons...

NATO + Ukraine = War with Russia.

Got it, idiots, or is this still too complicated?

Just in case you are tempted to come back with shyt like "sovereign country" or "freedom and democracy", write it on a sheet of paper, roll it up, and shove it.
Miloslaw 19 | 5,064
26 Apr 2024 #2,008
But, lest us not forget that Russian aggression opened the meat grinder in the first place.

That is the most important thing in this debate.

The meat grinder will continue, on both sides, as long as the west continue to support Ukraine with arms and as long as Russia continues this futile invasion.

In the end, the west will not let Ukraine lose.If it comes to it, it will be WW3...... is Russia ready for that?

I don't think so.
Novichok 4 | 8,324
26 Apr 2024 #2,009
as the west continues to support Ukraine with arms and as long as Russia continues this futile invasion.

Not futile at all. Russia now owns CDL and made Ukraine as unattractive to the EU and NATO as hookers with AIDS are unattractive to the johns.

If it is worth the deaths and expenses is up to Russia. Not my problem.

Blowing billions on a war nobody here gives a fvck about is my business because I am paying for this shyt.

Ukraine was part of the USSR so I don't give a rat's ass if one day it becomes part of Russia.

BTW, did I say that I celebrate when Russians kill NATO volunteers? I can watch those videos all day long...
Novichok 4 | 8,324
26 Apr 2024 #2,010
US nuclear weapons in Poland would be priority military target - Moscow
Warsaw wants to host NATO arms under the bloc's sharing scheme

Russia would consider foreign deployments of nuclear weapons in Poland a primary military target, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has warned.


...and rightly so...

Just as the US considered Cuba with the Soviet nukes a target worth going to blows with the Soviets over...

I didn't realize that Poland has so many morons...The supply far exceeds the demand.


Home / News / Poland`s aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 10