Polish women fight for their rights - manifa and other events

Jaskier, it is unfortunate that you are unable to follow along with the discussion.

A majority of women have such fantasies. That's the point.

Go do a search for the following title: Study: Up to 60 percent of women fantasize about 'being dominated'. It is from the Washington Post which is a Leftist propaganda rag.


If so many women enjoy being dominated then why would they have a problem carrying out servant duties around the house for the man who paid for it all and provides for them?

Here's one explanation:

psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psyched/200905/why-dominant-women-enjoy-sexual-submission-fantasies-part-2

- "these fantasies instead reflect a passionate exchange with a powerful, resource-holding, and attentive suitor, then through them the dominant woman could reinforce her high standing in the group and her favorable opinion of herself."

In short these fantasies reinforce women's inherent hypergamous and solipsistic nature.

Go back and read the read the article I provided from The Independent regarding divorce. The number one reason give for the high divorce rates was due to "unreasonable behaviour".


These female domination fantasies don't suddenly go away when a man and woman shack-up together or when they exchange wedding vows.

So how can any man expect to have a loving, stable, long-term relationship when there is a disproportionate chance that he will land a woman who is constantly unsatisfied with sex and her material station in life compared to other women?

And don't forget that, like children, women do not want any responsibilities for their own decision or actions they take in life or how it impacts those around them.

Also don't forget how so-called "patriarchial" societies are in fact gynocentric. Indeed, men evolved to mate with as many women as available. Women prefer one mate but, like their domination fantasies, don't mind sharing that one mate as long as she perceives he is an alfa and she has higher status as a result.

Look at how religions made ceremonies and vows that a man will give up his biological imperative and pair bond with only one woman which only satisfies her biological imperative.

Look at how laws disproportionately favour women in ensuring their care and comfort even when they are the ones who nearly always initiate a divorce.

Look at how laws wrongly assume that women should have custody and control over children from birth and through upbringing particularly when they initiate a divorce.

Look at how policies and programs disproportionately favour women regarding maternity, homelessness, and other welfare the overwhelming amount of which is funded off the labour of men.

Given this reality, your stance is that that a man should come home after a long day at work and rather than be shown any gratitude from those he cares and provides for (particularly his "oppressed" wife with domination fantasies) he instead should get busy cooking and cleaning so that all the women in his life can live the feminist fantasy of being totally equal to a man.

It's a shame that so many countries who proudly claim to be secular or strive to separate religious influence on government and social life don't squelch the screeching voice of feminist fanatics in equal measure.

Thank you for that detailed explanation. You have more patience with explaining things to beta cucks than I do. Although I've come to the realization that the vast majority won't change their minds despite presented with mounds of evidence, stats, etc and therefore it is simply more amusing to poke fun at their ridiculous cultural marxist beliefs. The surprising thing is how so often their physiognomy more resembles that of an unattractive woman or pubescent boy.

Great, so what stops man doing their share? And how are women more suited to eadhing the dishes or vacuuming? Can't man do the tasks most 10 year olds can do (including boys)?


And as any sexuologist will tell you fantasy is nit real life. It's lije a man fantasizing about huge penis to realize that one cannot do much with it.

And even if most women enjoyed being dominated in bed in real life it doesn't mean they would want the same outside of the bedroom.

The laws you are mentioning usually are there because of kids, not women. Do you want to check how many fathers stay around to raise disabled kids?


Why not? That's what most women do. The times when most women had to stay at home are gone . The only residue is the dispriportion in house chores

Feminism in action in the uk

• 
  2019internationalw.jpg
  

You are such a stud...Bravo...
That's what you wanted to acomplish posting picture of few women that you deem unatractive?
How brave, how manly...

I guarantee it's a lot less than black men staying around to raise their kids. Black and disabled? No way...

It's like the saying what's the most confusing day in Harlem? Father's day.


Fine.... I'll post one of a beautiful attractive feminist

Happy now?

Let's play a game

Pregnant or fat? The one in the middle and to the right. The middle one is easy, one to the right is a little harder.

You libs make this too easy...

You know what my woman did yesterday? Made dinner and drank wine with me and two bottles later ended up in the bedroom. And I guarantee this morning she's happier than any feminist above.

Are you talking about your problems with your man? Bring it up with him. Why ask me? People and their interaction are a mixed bag and complex. IF you're talking in general terms I can answer that easily. It none of your business.

What are you, a warrior princess for justices? Don't butt in into other people relationship, that meddling is not good for anyone and is not a good trait.


Are you in relationship or you're just F buddies or dating? I'm being generous here with my questions. To be honest it seems as if you were bragging that you get laid. Which brings about a creeping suspicious thought - is that a lie?

I don't really apply terms and just go with the flow. Ive been with her several years though

I am really talking, and I find this conversation really fascinating, because I have never heard such radically funny views before. I wonder where they come from. Did you, lot, have awfully dominating mothers and in result of a childish trauma, you detest similar women today? Or there are other reasons? To be honest, I would love to know them, as exploring human psychology is one of my fav hobbies.

One more thing. I don`t expect anyone of you, Dirk, Ptak, Shiton and Iron, to be on good and intimately close terms with a feminazi, as you call them. But what about an average woman who is self confident and doesn`t allow you to be treated like a doormat. Simply speaking, unsubmissive type but still normal. Are you able to get an erection on her or are you too scared? Sorry for asking, I don`t want to hurt your feelings, I am just curious.

Very few of those women identify with the current radical feminist movement.

Sadly, now we're at a point where now mom's have to tell their sons to avoid women in college lest they end up in a situation where they have drunken sex, the woman claims rape and now the dude has to register as a sex offenders for the rest of his life - even though oftentimes rhe woman recants and even acts as a character witness for the defense. Sadly by then it's too late. That's what feminism has created.

Stop spreading false info. College rape is a painful issue in the USA, all those rape cases can`t be made up.

campussafetymagazine.com/safety/sexual-assault-statistics-and-myths/

More than half of raped college women tell no one of their victimization (1)
99% of people who rape are men (1)
Only about 2% of all sexual assault accusations reported to police turn out to be false.

Its BS. Believe it on your peril.


That question confirm you're not very bright.

Guys, stop this silly bickering and focus on the subject matter -manifas and other events.

Yesterday we celebrated the 8th of March - Women`s Day. Did you thank your female partners for being such wonderful creatures they stick to you no matter what you do/say?

International Women` Strike celebration in Warsaw!

wprost.pl/zycie/10197542/disco-przeciw-nienawisci-protestujacy-w-warszawie-chca-zmiany-nazwy-ronda-dmowskiego.html

The declaration: We protest against misogynists, chauvinists and naziols. Also, against child molesters and haters. We demand that Roman Dmowski roundabout is renamed to Women`s Rights. (Dmowski, rightist nationalist, objected to equal rights of women)

• 
  D1IlX2HWoAAkRck.jpg
  
• 
  ru0r660660q80.jpg
  

You described females as creatures, huh? Really?!

Did anyone else notice the virtue-signalling OP's chauvinistic Freudian slip?

This isn't some minor translation error.

It is this sort of latent misogynistic depersonification of a protected class of people which always results in violence against women.

Shiton, are you blind with fury or you don`t know English? :)

creature - used to refer to a life form that is unusual:
The unicorn is a mythical creature.

Fake Feminist, are you so blind with your misogyny that you don't realise that others will take notice of your choice of words and what they really mean in English?

creature

noun: creature; plural noun: creatures

- an animal, as distinct from a human being.

- a fictional or imaginary being, typically a frightening one.

You are using biased sources which suit your antifemale agenda, woman hater. Of course they are worthless, don`t expect that any reasonable people will fall for that. :) Don`t you see you make a fool of yourself in every post of yours? I suggest you register anew and start another life here, because as Shiton you are finished. :)

The term feminazi speaks more of the authors that use it than of a feminazi.

Google is a biased source? Yes, they are, but they are feminist.

You describing women as creatures has exposed you for who you really are and that it is you with suppressed misogynistic attitudes towards women.

Like all virtue-signallers you are a phony and have been using this thread to project your own demonstrated chauvinism onto other men.

If you genuinely cared about women you wouldn't have started this wedge-issue topic in the first place.

Yes. However, I am sure those maniacal rightists realise that it discredits them but they just can`t resist, it is stronger than them. :)


Aaah, this is ailing you! Sorry, Shiton , but I have always fought for women`s rights and will continue till my last hour. Give up all hope because I won`t stop. Amen! See you again in this and other threads. :)

Admit you sprang your own trap. Those who correct minor mistakes of others ,sooner or later fall into contraption of their own making

Your excuse sounds like guy admitting to an adultery. Yeah but that was with a woman other than my wife ,besides ***** is dead now

Hmm, I must be tired and sleepy because I don`t remember correcting anybody`s minor mistake. What do you mean?

Maybe in Germany thanks to the cultural enrichers, not the USA though.

A coed having consensual sex while drunk is not rape.


Bwahahah. That's the hypocrisy I'm talking about. The left ends up always eating their own ..

But honestly can you believe the amount of soy running through some of these peoples veins???


Facebook found that at their company there's a gender pay gap. Men are paid less than women there.

Just like 'women's health's now means killing unborn babies, gender pay gap is more social engineering b.s.

Virtue signalling doesn't count. Virtue signalling is a self-serving, attention-seeking exercise which the doer knows full well is futile and of no benefit to the special interest group being championed.

Indeed, if you have been fighting for women's rights your whole life then it says everything that women are still needing to "fight for their rights" in the 21st century when you lived most of yours back in the 20th.

Not this matters to any fake feminists, but hardcore feminists really do hate men and don't want men's assistance because then they would have to give men credit and they can't bear to do that.

Don't believe me? Then don't.

But the next time you are boasting of your feminist credentials and how you have been "fighting for women's right" since your cherished PRL heydays then stop to remember this old but widely known feminist slogan:

"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle."

Facebook found that at their company there's a gender pay gap. Men are paid less than women there.


That's because you're a beta. Most women would prefer you be an alpha. Instead of supporting feminazis, you would make more women happier by doing things like working out and getting swole, making money, driving a gas guzzler or motorcycle, learning how to remodel your homes so you don't appear less of a man when your sink gets clogged or a ceiling fan needs to be installed

The number one criticism of women regarding men today is that they're not manly enough.at the same time, most women's fantasy is to be dominated by a man. Women don't want some beta fighting for their rights. No they want a hairy chested dude pinning them down and being rough. You don't even need to be a rich man to attract 8s 9s and 10s. Just being manly and confident is enough. Hell one of my friends works as a jeweler and his wife is a psyd making hundreds of thousands a year while he's making 20 an hour. And she absolutely adores him

BTW, most feminist leaders and prominent feminists are Jewish. Cohencidence??? I think not...

Guys, it is a great pleasure to talk to you, but it is nearly 2 am now and I prefer to call it a day. But feel free to discuss the topic with each other while I have a rest, I will look through it later on and contribute with some comments. Thanks for your input, it is really appreciated. :):)

Take care gnite

Where did you get the idea that ,"rightists" as you label conservatism, are against women rights. Nothing further from the truth.
You just see excessive demands as rights . Do you support Virginia law, for instance, allowing doctor and the mother to murder a baby born alive and outside mothers body?

Do you agree that's the woman right?

Agreed!


Hear, hear!


I'm not surprised. I'm sure you know too that California wants a quota system for women on corporate boards or face fines. Not because they are qualified and will benefit the companies but simply because they are women.

Women are also now over represented in many colleges thanks to programs that actively discriminate against eminently eligible and gifted young men.

Never mind most of these women will never benefit the economy with their degrees because once they find a job they will soon want to get knocked up and join the legions of stay-at-home mothers living off the high taxes levied on other working men.

Jaskier, I'm sure that most men these days are not still living in the stone age, as demonstrated by some 'men' posting here. I wonder if they would talk to their own mothers in the same way as they do here. I suspect not.


These inadequate 'men' don't want someone that is their equal. They only feel in control when they have someone to dominate who is not a threat to them. Someone who looks good, doesn't have much between the ears, and doesn't answer back. Basically, they want a stepford wife.


Have you not been reading this thread? In addition, go look in Polanda at the recently removed random chat posts, there are comments there from 'conservatives' who think that women should never have been allowed to vote.

* Waits for the response of 'I must be a man-hater' or an 'ugly short dyke'.