Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland?

PolskiMoc is circumcised. He's a TRUE POLE.

Everything you say delphi is absolutely stupid. you never say anything smart, or anything positive about poland, you are just here to bully polish people. If I were admin you would be range banned for life.

He isn't a Pole - he's never been here, doesn't speak the language and only 'knows' what he's read on the internet.

Circumcisn is cool! All Poles should do it!

Lose the hood! :D

Because they love their children and they see how this practice is abusive to children.

I think it has become obvious from this thread that the reason more Poles don't do it is because of the anti-snipping militants bullying them.

Hey, here's an idea, how about you leave peeps alone to make such decisions for their own families! You know, privacy, liberty and freedom and all that...

Circumcision is a personal choice of parents, much as is to breast feed or not...

Who cares about this issue?

This is like the the various absurd topics posted by forum homosexuals.

Why would cosmetic surgery on the penis be even remotely important?

I don't really care so much about it. I just always make it a point to oppose militant Lefties who refuse to just MTOFB as they try to bully their will onto others.

It displays the tyrannical mob mentality of the Left. And if left unchecked, such mentality leads to actual policy, as we are presently seeing in the US where a few LibCommie communities are actually TRYING TO OUTLAW circumcision. Crazy.

Poles, like everyone else, should have the personal freedom to decide such private things without the mob bullies having any say in the matter.

Fair enough, which is probably why it's only practiced in Poland by Jews and Muslims. Parents have made the personal choice not to chop their kids for various reasons that are mentioned earlier in the thread.

Fine. So long as they make such decisions freely without being pressured by the meddling mob.


I think this smart guy may be onto something here. Perhaps this bullying mob mentality, bent on controlling the private lives of others, we have seen here is a holdover from Poland's Commie days?

No one is bullying any Poles from what I can see. It is just natural for them to leave it alone. So, why do you care?

You are the one who is bullying them to change their ways.

OMG. Maybe you need to reread the thread.


I already explained why I care. Rather clearly.


Nope. I am challenging the bullies to let peeps decide for themselves. Freedom of choice. One could hardly call this 'bullying' (well, unless one sees bullying of bullies as a bad thing. Lol).

Poor try on your part. Fail.

Very well put, Llama :)
Totally agree. Most Poles wouldn't do it though, because it's not a cultural norm. Most the world doesn't have it done so I doubt it ever becomes popular in Poland.

You may be in a contest to pass or fail.

Generally, I enjoy a good discussion. I have no vested interest in pass or fail. I believe the original poster's question was answered. However, his question was laced with the notion that Polish customs were barbaric. That to me was bullying, and a thinly veiled put-down.

I do know there are those in the States who militantly want everyone to conform to what they view as wholesome and good. So, I get where you are coming from. However, my impression is that Poland has its customs, and they are not in danger of being bullied into changing them. Especially not from people on a forum. I could be wrong, but to me this is not an issue in Poland. Just their own personal preference.


In a way, I do. lol

Very well. :)

Softie smiles and passes the olive branch. :)

Poland is in Europe. Anyone who is not a backward person would know that. Anyone who wasn't sure would check an atlas, world map, or globe, if he or she were not so backward. Yup, Europe, that place where no one is circumcised, other than the rare Jewish family that still does it (many do not) or Muslim guest workers with families in tow. In some European countries with absolutely no circumcision the HIV/AIDS rate is 600% less than it is in the USA with all its circumcised men. Same for Japan. Now who is backward? Modern, enlightened cultures that do not brutally mutilate the sex organs of infants and children, or those who continue to practice pre-historic Middle Eastern blood rituals that harm infants and children?

would you cut a girl so she is not made fun of?

The arguments for male genital mutilation are all retarded, and largely driven by desperation of men to justify their obvious loss of a normal sexual anatomy.

I am a circumcised male, and I hate it. I am a victim of violent disfiguring child rape.

Was it crazy to outlaw female circumcision? Many forms of female circumcision are far less damaging than male circumcision.

No parent should have the right to decide that you don't get to keep part of your normal genitalia. Any other position on the matter is retarded. Genital mutilation, and yes, male circumcision is mutilation should be punishable by death.

As far as I know from the major western civilized countries
only America practices this nonsense.

I believe though that even in the US more people are realizing that circumcision is pointless.

What a s'tupid topic. Most of Europe does not circumcize. Damn trolls.

Very well done.

Next we'll ask why Polish men grow mustaches...who cares, it doesn't hurt them or anyone else. It's part of their culture and ought to be respected.

Circumcision in America was widely popularised by Jewish doctors after the European horror of WW2.

It was promoted even sooner than that. During the Great Depression the Civilian Conservation Corps was formed to provide employment for youths and they were all required to undergo circumcision and be back on the job after only a few days recuperation, but the kinder supervisors allowed them to wear overcoats rigged with sticks, like tents, so that no cloth would scrape their wound.

this sounds like they were retaliating for the WWII on innocent victims, being active part of slicing and cutting process for a change :))

What does it have to do with horror of WWII?

And. Russians lost 15 million civilians, we lost close to a million, Poles 6 million.
And did we get the chance to perform symbolic castrations in return? No.

It makes nude Gentile men indistinguishable from nude Jewish men, thus preventing the latter from being singled out for extermination by being disrobed.

the scary thing is you probably believe that to be true

please tell me you are joking

The Germns did not have to rely on pen1s apperance to decide who is Jew and who is not.They had a whole lot of anthropometric tools.

Probably circumcision was widespread in America to reduce incidence of syphilis transmission and other STDs where Europeans had the ceremonial stuff.However the uncircumcised pen1s is always superior as our slavic women can testify.

Nonsense.

Jews are fairly easy to pick out.

Large deformed noses (hooked like)
Sleepy Hallow Eyes
Black Curly Hair.
etc

I was merely explaining to Natasa why Pawain wrote of WW2 in post #173. I do not believe that Jewish doctors promoted circumcision for this reason, nor do I believe its widespread practice in the USA was instigated at the behest of Jewish doctors. The scary thing is that you, Hythorn, are ready to believe that I am some kind of conspiracy theorist when I have never, in all my posts on this forum, ascribed to any of the conspiracy theories that are herein promoted, some by your fellow English teachers.

Edit: on re-examining your post, Hythorn, it appears that you are saying that circumcision does not make Jews and Gentiles indistinguishable when disrobed, and if you believe this to be the case, then you're even scarier that I thought.

Yes.


All of them? You told us what your sterotyped image of a Jew is like.

Do you know there are Jews that are blond?


Sometimes they did.


I agree. Hythorn doesn`t know much about it.