The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Home / Law  % width posts: 2,874

The right to own guns: would you support such legislation in Poland?


Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,731
besides a lethal weapon?

I will answer your question after you answer the questions I already asked.

1. Do you own a car?
2. Did you ever call 911?
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,733
Cars are lethal. You should immediately give up yours.

what do you use gun for besides a lethal weapon?

To stop the threat. Cops have guns precisely for the same reason.

Why did you call 911, not a local library or a priest?
Lenka 5 | 3,518
28 Apr 2024 #2,734
Can be, true. But they are also immensely useful in everyday use. Guns are not.
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,735
Can be, true. But they are also immensely useful

Not "can be". They are when used irresponsibly. Following your logic, the state should have a monopoly on transporting people just as it has a monopoly of protecting them.

Therefore, cars should be driven only by well-trained and licensed government car operators. Private ownership should be banned. Need to go shopping? Call 1-800-123-TAXI.

Why did you call 911, not a local library or a priest?
Lenka 5 | 3,518
28 Apr 2024 #2,736
Following your logic

Again, cars are useful on daily basis. Guns are not.
And yes, we do license who can use them, same with guns.

not a local library or a priest?

Because I needed different services. But no, I didn't need police for their guns.
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,737
Again, cars are useful on a daily basis. Guns are not.

If guns were not useful on a daily basis, cops would not be carrying them daily. Only on parades.

The probability of being useful is another matter.

To estimate guns' usefulness you multiply the probability of being absolutely critical by the value of what they protect when that moment comes.

If this concept is over your head, I will be happy to elaborate further.

Because I needed different services.

You are lying. Nobody calls 911 unless it's an emergency. When you do, they ask if you want the police or EMTs or both. For information, every police department had a different number.

So what was the reason why you called their emergency number?
pawian 223 | 24,567
28 Apr 2024 #2,738
If guns were not useful on a daily basis, cops would not be carrying them daily.

Using your logic, English language books are useful on a daily basis, too and as such you should have one on you at all times. Do you, from September to June at least??? hahahaha
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,739
And yes, we do license who can use them, same with guns.

You skipped over the issue of government monopoly. If the gov can demand a monopoly on the use of guns it should have a monopoly on the use of cars.
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,740
In Poland, in 2020:

Deadly car accidents - 2500 per year
Homicides - 500 per year

Ban private cars, give the government a monopoly on transporting goods and people, and save 2400 lives.

Unreasonable? Fine...Pass a law that suspends DL for life after being caught with more alcohol than in a baby's formula.
Lenka 5 | 3,518
28 Apr 2024 #2,741
Nobody calls 911 unless it's an emergency.

You are correct but it doesn't mean you need someone with a gun. Again, Polish police uses guns very sporadically. It's for years less then 200 times a year.

You skipped over the issue of government monopoly

Government doesn't have a monopoly. People can get a permit. It's just much more complex than USA. And Poles like it that way
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,742
People can get a permit.

To have guns at home, loaded and ready for self-defense?

Why did you call 911?
Lenka 5 | 3,518
28 Apr 2024 #2,743
To have guns at home, loaded and ready for self-defense?

Yes but it has to be kept in a safe
pawian 223 | 24,567
28 Apr 2024 #2,744
to be kept in a safe

Which can prove useless, in fact. I remember a case when burglars tore the safe with a hunting gun off the wall and took out the whole thing. I saw that hole in the wall later on.
jon357 74 | 22,287
28 Apr 2024 #2,745
tore the safe with a hunting gun off the wall and took out the whole thing

Quite.

Some of the posters from one particular country think that if more people had guns then they could stop violent crime.

Yet in that country they have 120 guns per 100 people and it doesn't stop violent crime at all; in fact they very obviously have none of the highest rates of gun crime in the world.

The bad guys are better at using them and have the element of surprise.
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,746
Yes but it has to be kept in a safe

Then it's useless.

It also means that Poles have no right to self-defense and that defense against violent attacks is a state monopoly.

Yet in that country they have 120 guns per 100 people and it doesn't stop violent crime at all

You are a damn liar.

The white US with its 400,000,000 guns has a murder rate that is lower than in Finland, Austria, France, and Canada.

See Post 2646. If your data is different, post it or GFY.

Is every Euro a brainless moron?
Lenka 5 | 3,518
28 Apr 2024 #2,747
It also means that Poles have no right to self-defense

No, it means we treat seriously the possibility of accidental shooting and chance of the gun being stolen.

But FFS it's none of your business. Go hug your guns and leave Poland and Europe alone
jon357 74 | 22,287
28 Apr 2024 #2,748
white US

As countries go, it's very much not 'white' though is it.

Finland, Austria, France, and Canada

That's not a high bar.

Nor is it a genuine statistic since there's no such thing as "white America".
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,749
No, it means we treat seriously the possibility of accidental shooting and chance of the gun being stolen.

You are not entitled to switch subjects while responding to a claim.

Poles have no right to self-defense

My claim sands alone. You either agree with it or not.

Your quoted sentence deals with policies and rules. You can collectively decide to give up your right to self-defense for a variety of reasons.

But that is separate from the fact that today you have no right to self-defense. We do and will never give it up. Ask any American here.

Any BS about how guns are statistically dangerous to "society" is pure demagoguery because when MY LIFE is threatened statistics don't matter.

The only thing that matters is who will be still standing in the next 10 seconds.

Nor is it a genuine statistic since there's no such thing as "white America".

Yes, there is such a thing as white America - the America where nig*ers don't live in numbers sufficient to sway the crime rates. See Vermont, Montana...

Locally, Northbrook, Illinois. Haven't seen black face yet...

Why do you think houses are so expensive there...
Lenka 5 | 3,518
28 Apr 2024 #2,750
You can collectively decide to give up your right to self-defense for a variety of reasons.

We didn't. You can defend yourself including with gun. The laws around storing your gun don't negate that.
Novichok 4 | 8,067
28 Apr 2024 #2,751
The laws around storing your gun don't negate that.

Without a gun, even adult men can't defend themselves. This is why cops carry guns.

Why don't you call that grandma and tell her how to do it without a gun?

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13357935/Albuquerque-grandmother-shoots-intruder-granddaughter-home.html
jon357 74 | 22,287
28 Apr 2024 #2,752
even adult men can't defend themselves

Why would anyone need to?

You must live in a shítty place.
Joker 3 | 2,409
29 Apr 2024 #2,753
You must live in a shítty place.

Its much nicer than anything York has to offer, thats for sure.
Novichok 4 | 8,067
29 Apr 2024 #2,754
Why would anyone need to?

When I see your "jon357" I feel like I need to throw up. Please don't make it worse by idiotic comments like your last one.

In the hetero world, men attack men with fists, hard objects, and guns. In your world, there are no men so I am not surprised by your question.

Go away...
johnny reb 49 | 7,328
29 Apr 2024 #2,755
We only have a couple of Polish members here voicing their opinion on this subject.
My bet is that if a poll was taken today that the overwhelming number of citizens of Poland would prefer to be able to have the right to have a gun in their home.
Novichok 4 | 8,067
29 Apr 2024 #2,756
to have the right to have a gun in their home.

You are absolutely correct.

Poles, better than any other country, know what happens to defenseless people.

To suggest that Poles, brave enough to stand up to the Germans in 1939 and 1944, would voluntarily disarm themselves and beg for their lives when a couple of drunk azzholes came uninvited at 2 am is insanity.
jon357 74 | 22,287
29 Apr 2024 #2,757
Its much nicer than anything York has to offer

York?

One of the nicest cities in the world. And no gun crime ever. Why? Because guns are rightly unavailable.

It's interesting that the only people here who are promoting easy availability of guns are people who live in a place with a stratospherically high level of gun crime.

Nobody else wants that.
Alien 21 | 5,172
29 Apr 2024 #2,758
overwhelming number of citizens of Poland would prefer to be able to have the right to have a gun in their home.

But that's exactly what it is. You can apply for a gun permit and you usually get it, but very few people in Poland and Germany do it.
johnny reb 49 | 7,328
29 Apr 2024 #2,759
But that's exactly what it is.

So you can go to a gun shop in Poland and buy an AR-15 and a Glock handgun with 1000 rounds of ammo for each of them with that permit ?

It's interesting that the only people here

The only people ?
jon357, you are an ex-pat and speaking volumes for the country of Poland.
You are British, correct, and married your Polish husband to get your Polish citizenship. Pfffft !

.
Alien 21 | 5,172
29 Apr 2024 #2,760
you can go to a gun shop in Poland and buy

In fact, yes. Although I don't know if it's that easy to get a permit for an assault rifle.?


Home / Law / The right to own guns: would you support such legislation in Poland?