The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by Semsem  

Joined: 28 Dec 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 29 Apr 2012
Threads: Total: 16 / Live: 15 / Archived: 1
Posts: Total: 26 / Live: 23 / Archived: 3
From: United States

Displayed posts: 38 / page 2 of 2
sort: Oldest first   Latest first   |
Semsem   
6 Mar 2011
News / How Polish diaspora see future of Poland? as ethnic Polish state or just Polish in origin? [120]

Poland is Poland. The homeland of the Poles. The land that gave us kielbasa and pączki. The origin of our Catholicism. The father of the greatest Pope.

No self-respecting Pole (even a Plastic Pole) would ever think of Poland as being "Polish in origin", as that would give the idea that Poland is no longer an ethnically Polish country.

Although the birth rate of European nations is declining, Poland still (I believe) has a birthrate higher than that of the death rate, and so long as that continues and the Polish tongue is kept, it will always be viewed as an ethnically Polish state.
Semsem   
6 Mar 2011
History / Kingdom of Poland Map [14]

when exactly?

Not sure. Just found the map.

nope not even under the commonwealth was PL ever that big

Can I be pointed to a location that contains various maps of Poland from various time periods?

And, a side-question, is it correct (in any sense) to say that Poland owned Russia between 1610-12 with future Władysław IV as elected (but not crowned) Czar by the Seven Boyars? And then what of during the elected monarchy period? Would it be proper to say that when Poland was ruled by the King of a foreign land (Sweden, France, etc.), Poland was part of those nations (or vice-versa) at least monarchical wise (as opposed to governmental wise)?
Semsem   
18 Jul 2011
History / Why is the Battle of Grunwald celebrated more than the Battle of Lubiszewo? [29]

Wouldn't it also be since Grunwald halted the Tuetons, whom if had won would have probably continued and conquered Western Europe? At least...that's what I was taught, and I find it interesting how many times Poland saved the rest of Europe, but don't even get an honorable mention in history classes in most nations.
Semsem   
24 Jul 2011
History / Why is the Battle of Grunwald celebrated more than the Battle of Lubiszewo? [29]

How do you figure both is "bollocks" (an English term which I don't really know exactly)?

The Battle of Grunwald killed off the grand master of the time, and many of the other heads of the order. They were unable to truly recover from then, and thus slowly declined as history shows us. The Knights, had they been victorious, would have most likely spread and continued to conquer other vast parts (if not all) of Western Europe.

And, with regards to Education, it is NOT taught in ANY schools in America or Canada. It might be taught in some nations of Europe, but I'd be willing to bet that it isn't taught in that many.

Or again, am I wrong?
Semsem   
6 Sep 2011
Genealogy / BIALIK / Bialek, Kotecki, Witucki, Ezdebski Families - Jaslo and Poznan [17]

Well, I know no Bialik's were ennobled, but I know Biały's were (as per Wiki) and if I understand hereditary inheritance and whatnot, since my Biały's became Białyk, then Białik, and finally Bialik, over the centuries, then that would mean that although the name evolved, the c-o-a was still inherited, would it not have been?
Semsem   
23 Apr 2012
Language / The complement of the verb "to be" [14]

Trying to make sense of "Polish an Essential Grammar" by Dana Bielec....going over the verbs part for the umpteenth time,and still having problems...

Namely with the complement of the verb "to be". I can't seem to make sense of it. Some of the examples make sense that she has, but others not...to me at least.

So, can anyone explain to me when you are to use the infinitive as the complement of the verb "to be"?

One example she uses: Dlaczego mu nie pomóc? - Why not help him? ... Why is "Pomóc" in the infinitive? Where would any form of "to be" possibly fit in there (being omitted of course)?
Semsem   
29 Apr 2012
Language / The complement of the verb "to be" [14]

Well, an example from the book that I understand:

Lepiej poczekać. - It's better to wait.

My problem was that there are examples under "5.1.1.3 As complement of the verb 'to be' (which is left unsaid)", but only some of them made sense to me where some form of "to be" would be possible to include to make the sentence still grammatically correct. I was thinking of "am, are, is" etc.

Makes sense though with the conditional tense. Kind of stupid of me. Read the whole chapter on verbs multiple times, and as such have read over the conditional tense many times. It would appear as though I still have a hard time fully understanding the translation...the fact that Polish has a conditional tense (although, I'd imagine English has one as well, to be technical), only English doesn't have a special word or series of words to make it distinguishable from the other tenses (like: I was, I am, I will be; ate, eat. will eat; etc.)

The lesson learned today for me: always remember Polish has additional tenses and distinguishing forms of words, and that at times a translation might require a bit of abstract thought...not like the extremely linear thought that is English.

I also feel the need to thank all of you who have made me realize this. As I think that that might just be the thing that allows me to truly master Polish in due time. To step out from the idea there must be a proper word-for-word translation, that each word needs to be translated somehow, and realize that Polish might need additives to words and whatnot that one would never find in English.

There are days when I wish my ancestors had taught Polish to their children, instead of letting them learn solely English; or that I had been born in a nation of Europe where I'd have stood a chance learning a more complicated grammatical language. But alas, such is life.