The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by NomadatNet  

Joined: 28 Mar 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 11 Aug 2011
Threads: 1
Posts: Total: 457 / Live: 450 / Archived: 7

Speaks Polish?: No

Displayed posts: 451 / page 2 of 16
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
NomadatNet   
8 Aug 2011
News / Andrzej Lepper committed suicide [98]

Or maybe, he was just up to his eyeballs in debt along with legal action and took the easy way out rather than facing the music?

So, he didn't have enough money to buy a gun? people with money problem usually prefer to shoot in their heads.. suicide by rope is rarely seen in their suicides of business people, politicians, public characters.
NomadatNet   
8 Aug 2011
News / Andrzej Lepper committed suicide [98]

Then others would have been taken out too.

Maybe, some small people are already taken out, who knows..
We know public people, people under spotlights. Maybe, Lepper who was also a loose lips, a politican, was a warning / intimidation to the others.. Or, just a revenge, who knows, as documents are already published by Guardian.
NomadatNet   
8 Aug 2011
News / Andrzej Lepper committed suicide [98]

Why wikileaks haven't published MI6 tortures shows that Assange isn't as shown. We have been hearing CIA tortures for a long time, but, haven't heard much about MI6 tortures although it seems it was more than CIA's and more systematic. Guardian published about this a day ago or two. If Lepper spoke about CIA tortures/prisons before, then, he probably had interest in these things, so, he might have also learnt some info about MI6 prisons and tortures too.
NomadatNet   
7 Aug 2011
News / Andrzej Lepper committed suicide [98]

Seanus, Assange knows nothing other than what is given to him by whoever behind wikileaks really.. (for that, to understand who, look into what wikileaks have published for months, after his arrest)

DD, (assuming he knew something secret that was also known by kaczynski - i see you are more about this), who knows.. but, if there is such a secret, then, kaczynski didn't die due to accident and lepper didn't die by suicide.
NomadatNet   
7 Aug 2011
News / Andrzej Lepper committed suicide [98]

He knew many secrets, not only about CIA prisons.

For example, MI6 prisons too in Europe (maybe, in Poland too?), revealed just a day ago or two at Guardian.co?
NomadatNet   
7 Aug 2011
News / Citizen-led Initiative on Abortion Law in Poland [50]

not to mention if she gets raped. is it still her fault and her responsibility?

this is too complicated thing.. in unmarried togethership, it is usually easy to classify, when female complains and applies to the law, most of the time, it is considered as rape.. but, in married togetherships, there is no such a thing like rape. Maybe, most of us are products of rapes in marriages..

Not to call a sexual relation a rape, what is needed? Simple, agreement by both sides, by female and by male, isn't it. When marrying, the both sides say "yes" to togethership, that also means "yes" to making baby too. But, are they asked how many babies? No. Usually husbands make decisions about the number of babies. So, even if wife doesn't want another baby, she is not listened to and another baby is made. This isn't a rape, either? It is. But, woman can't apply anywhere and they will have a baby who won't be seen as rape product. If we think older days, probably, most of us are rape products. Women in marriages just don't have voices. In unmarried sexual relations, if forced, we hear their voices of females about the rape and since it is unmarried relation, all institutions including religion institutions and laws usually side with females and put males into jails. So, while similar things happening in sexual relations including rapes in marriages too, why don't we hear their voices of institutions, religious institutions, etc? Simple, they force people to marry and they don't do this for ethics morals etc, but, to make some benefits for themselves.

Anyway. Everybody knows such things already. Then, why did I tell these, rapes in marriages too? For this reason: Okay, usually richer couples can solve their abortion problems by travelling to Austria etc - but, what will poorer masses do? It is easy: What happens if wife goes to law and says, "it was a rape in marriage", what will the judge do? has to accept as things inside marriages are totally on declarations only.. The judge can't break marriage either if wife and husband say they'll stay married.. So, there is rape and couple can do abortion legally. It doesn't have to be rape. Even in accidental cases, a rape claim is done by wife and abortion is done. So simple.

If my opinion is asked about abortion; First of all, the decision of making baby should be left only and only to women whether in married relation or unmarried relation. Then, unwanted pregnancies will be much less and abortion won't be a serious issue then and women will be free to do abortion then as they are women themselves who really know unwanted pregnancy better.

Btw, abortion/killing of very old people who are in dying beds too can be made legal. If euthanasia is made legal, painless methods can be used for such old people too.
NomadatNet   
7 Aug 2011
News / Andrzej Lepper committed suicide [98]

he wasn't capable of keeping secrets.

Perhaps, he knew some more important things than he spoke already. and his loose lips might have feared someones.

Anyway, without knowing anything, I can say that whenever a politican kills himself/herself, I always doubt. Politicans usually can find somethings to challenge, to stick the life, not to kill themselves. This is one of main characters of politicans.
NomadatNet   
7 Aug 2011
Travel / Direct flights to Asia from Poland [10]

LOT is under privatization process already
wbj.pl/article-55101-no-sector-investor-interested-in-lot.html
it seems they don't have enough finance to fly everywhere.
NomadatNet   
7 Aug 2011
History / Why did communism in Poland fail? [180]

you might have named those who designed revolution that would have sorted everything out.

You expect me to say they were "zionists" who designed revolution and then, we would have sorted everything out?

Designers must be true.
They designed international socialism starting in Russia.
They designed national socialism starting in Germany.
Anyway, even Marx himself too was a zionist.

Everythings really logical and I agree..

However, theory/design makers are a thing, appliers are another thing.
For example, this computer wasn't designed by me, but, I have been using it, differently than some others. You know this computer is used differently by many different groups from prn to radicals to sport hooligans to etc etc etc.. Russians got socialism tool like this computer and they used it for their own nationalist beneficiaries at Moscow center especially starting with late 1920s, when WWI was ended and a new era had started. The period between 1917 and late 1920s were not so important, it was a post-war periods everywhere in the world. Even in Turkey, there were many new revolutions in social lifes, etc. So, we need to look at Soviets more after 1930 to see the character of Soviets. It was more Russian nationalism than socialism, let alone international socialism. For Soviets, actually for Russian nationalists, after 1930, socialism became just a tool, absurdly used tool, like this computer tech which is also being used by radical nationalist right wings today. Anyway, it was still good to see that socialism, an old historical desired system of ordinary folks, became an official name of countries. Even this is a big step in human history. I believe other folks too will try and will maybe do a better socialist system in their countries. Or, as Marx said, maybe, it is time to go for global socialism, who knows. I see revolts, protests everywhere in the world. Just yesterday, 250,000 people in Israel protested and complained about their stiuations. If such a thing happened even in Israel, sleeping lazy folks in kingdoms including Arab kingdoms have no right to critisize anywhere else..
NomadatNet   
7 Aug 2011
Love / Affairs don't pay - Poles say [11]

17% says, pros and cons of romance and benefit are equal.
So, we can assume about half of them, 8.5%, on the benefit side a little bit more.

So, 72% + 8.5% = about 81% on the side of benefits.

About 80% are seperating or having problematic relations. That's, almost equal percentage above with people with opinions favoring benefits.

Either they are wrong in their opinions about benefits before starting relations or they are just simply lying when saying they believe benefits before starting relations.
NomadatNet   
6 Aug 2011
News / IS POLAND INFLUENTIAL? [16]

Poles_happy_with_their_careers__dissatisfied
Some good and true points in this article.

Interesting to read this:

".... only 12% of Poles believed that the crash was in some way engineered or was the result of a conspiracy to assassinate the late president.... . ...... This was an absolute shock for me and showed that Poles are a much more rational and level-headed people than many may think."

and this

"..... (80%) .. they believe everybody's salary should be at a similar level. It is in this respect that Poles are very egalitarian..... "
NomadatNet   
6 Aug 2011
History / Why did communism in Poland fail? [180]

Ok,then the only logical answer to OP question is:Communism in Poland failed because Soviet Union failed.Right or wrong?

Right. But, it wasn't communism that failed. Even at time Poland became a part of Soviets, Soviets were not communists. (in true sense of communism. Or, if we are to define communism as state control economy, all countries in the world are partially communists. In this sense, communism has failed or not? as still exists everywhere at every country in the world.)
NomadatNet   
6 Aug 2011
News / IS POLAND INFLUENTIAL? [16]

we look at countries if they are 1st world, 2nd world, or 3rd world.
Poland used to be 2nd world

This is the ranking of countries by their wealths and Europe countries have been ranked as 1st world due to their wealths. But, if you look at their debts per GDP, 19 of 20 top countries with big debts per Gdp are Western Europe countries which means that Europe countries have been wealthy by debts. Hence, these countries have been feeling the economic crisis most. Reality was that Western Europe countries were not really wealthy, hence, they were not 1st world countries. Western Europe is between 2nd and 3rd world in reality. Poland is better than them and 2nd world. Weapon power of countries isn't important anymore either as they can't make any big wars anymore due to globalization that made the world smaller and it is difficult to tell ordinary people why mass wars are necessary. Poland can be influential only if it is taken as example, with its real sector which doesn't show/overrate itself speculatively like Western Europe have been doing.
NomadatNet   
6 Aug 2011
History / Why did communism in Poland fail? [180]

Are these two statements not contradictory?
First you say the Monarch transformed then you go on to say that it was a monarch/nationalism system.

No, not contradictory. Transformation from monarchy to socialism happened directly, without elections like it happens in republic systems. Then, altough its name was socialist soviets, center of system was still monarchic/nationalist. Libya's country name too is socialist, but, it is very close to monarchy system, just unofficial/undeclared monarchy.

Name a system, that has existed ever, which this has not happened in?

dictation-from-top usually happens in monarchies. Laws are accordingly. When ordinary people in a monarchy don't like a law, they have nothing to do, other than revolting by blood. In Republic system, a law is made by elected representatives and if it is not liked by ordinary people, elected representatives lose their seats which is not a case in a monarchy as monarchy elites always think they think better than ordinary people. Republic system is a search toward better by softer actions and involvements of ordinary people in decision makings are forced slowly and gradually. My guess, ordinary people will reach a kind of socialism at the end. For example, private possessions of resources (lands etc) will not be liked by any ordinary person at the end as it will always cause troubles. State too won't own resources, but, can be organizators about adjustments of use of resources by elected experts by ordinary people.

Democracy is a transition period toward understanding experts in every fields better and better. For example, today, people search better medicine doctors and chose accordingly. If anything results good or bad, it is in patient's responsibility too. However, to minimize mistakes, to make better decisions on who is better expert or not, there will probably be a period of learning/understanding which may occur in a socialist system once resource privateships end. Anyway, it is a further stage that probably next generations will think about. Today, we still have monarchy systems in which people still try to keep their seats.
NomadatNet   
6 Aug 2011
History / Why did communism in Poland fail? [180]

Russia was a monarchy before 1917. With sudden transition from monarchy to socialism, socialism wasn't understood well enough. There is a Re-public-ing system first in which there is a democracy which is a path toward taking individual responsibilities too. In Soviets, centre power was a monarch/nationalists who didn't know such things like individualism and democracy yet and socialism was seen by people as dictation-from-top like it happens in monarchies. Poland under such a monarchist center of Soviets was more ready for socialism actually. If socialism started in Poland, it could be more successful than Russia socialism. Anyway, socialism, like any other system, has to be chosen by ordinary people and this process stage can happen in Republic system better.
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

Did airplane hit the ground on its nose? No. It hit trees even and those trees hitting the wing can be seen like a break, slowing the speed. It is not a hard, sudden impact like hitting its nose into the ground. And, people in the plane were aware of that it was risky landing due to the fog. So, they probably were taking some small safety cautions inside the plane before touching the ground. This cautions can increase survival ration at least 1% at this softer hard crash.. So, at least, one person or two were expected to survive.

But they couldn't, because it would be obvious to Warsaw that they had illegally landed.

Yak couldn't inform about the fog in Smolensk to Warsaw controller, cause Yak knew landing of Tu-154 was illegal, violating technical rules? and they couldn't say this not to make it clear to everyone that their president was doing wrong by landing decision? You mean this? Then, it means Yak crew knew their decision of people inside the plane in advance, an hour ago, that Tu-154 would be landing.. Then, why are we discussing about debates/discussions occured in the airplane in last 30 minutes? Okay, president probably was determined to land on the airport, but, he might not be thinking the fog would be so heavy. President's determination for landing has nothing to do with communication between Yak and Warsaw controller. Yak crew key person there saw himself as president and he made the decision that could be against president Lech? This is not different than Russians' not taking serious safety cautions at Smolensk airport. That's why we see an irrelevant person taking video captures of crash just after the crash?
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

So, Smolensk weather on April 10, 2010 between at Polish times, 5 and 11 AM:

5:00 AM - Poland time (corresponds to 7 AM Smolensk time - and 04 AM London time) -- Mist with 4 km visibility

6:41 AM - Poland time (corresponds to 8:41 AM Smolensk time - and 05:41 AM London time) -- Heavy fog with 400 m visibility) - Crash happend at this time..

8:00 AM - Poland time (corresponds to 10 AM Smolensk time - and 07 AM London time) -- Heavy fog with 500 m visibility

11:00 AM - Poland time (corresponds to 1 PM Smolensk time - and 10 AM London time) -- Mist 4 km visibility

----

We don't know at what time the minimum visibility was. With an interpolation in this weather data based on time, it is likely between 05:30 and 07:30 Polish times. I suppose minimum visibility was before 06:41, maybe, it was 200 m then and it is logical due to sunlights effect (before 8:41 smolensk time.) So, fog was heavier before 6:41, maybe, it was around 5:30- 6 AM when Yak was on Smolensk airport..

Between 6:41 and 8 AM, visibility change is 100 meters only. Since outside effects such as storms etc didn't exist there, it was a kind of stagnant or laminer flow, or slow process, with no sudden changes. So, change in moist/fog is more or less linear change except at around critical point of phase change which likely took a minute or two. So, assuming minimum visibility 400 m was at 6:41, then, at 5:41, visibility was again 500 m.. Again, 5:41 was the time when Yak was at Smolensk airport.. Except those critical minute or two, change in the weather took at least 2-3 hours, between 5 and 8-9 AM polish time. One hour of this change, which was enough to forecast coming fog was before crash time.

So, Yak definitely knew it was heavy fog and Yak crew should have informed urgently.. But, we don't hear anything, any such urgent communication between Yak crew and Warsaw controller..
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

This data I got from a forum, claimed to be taken from an aviation site, is true?

Smolensk on April 10, 2010:
1:00 AM 6 °C -0 °C 52% 1025 hPa 10 kilometers SE 7.2 km/h /
4:00 AM 3 °C -0 °C 72% 1025 hPa 10 kilometers SE 7.2 km/h /
7:00 AM 0 °C -1 °C 89% 1025 hPa 4 kilometers ESE 7.2 km/h / Mist
10:00 AM 1 °C 1 °C 98% 1026 hPa 0.5 kilometers SE 10.8 km/h / Heavy Fog
1:00 PM 3 °C 2 °C 94% 1025 hPa 4 kilometers East 14.4 km/h / Mist


Then, heavy fog occured later after the crush became another reason.
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

"Mist" can turn into "Fog" in a matter of seconds

Yes, but, all points in the air mass at smolensk isn't at the same temperature. For heavy fog, a big mass of air, mist in it, need more than an hour to evaporate. Heavy fog doesn't occur suddenly, it takes more than hour due to that point temperatures at every point of air isn't same.
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

Aviation meteorology on April 10: (got it from a forum - no reference is needed as it is likely official met data.)

1:00 AM 6 °C -0 °C 52% 1025 hPa 10 kilometers SE 7.2 km/h /
4:00 AM 3 °C -0 °C 72% 1025 hPa 10 kilometers SE 7.2 km/h /
7:00 AM 0 °C -1 °C 89% 1025 hPa 4 kilometers ESE 7.2 km/h / Mist
10:00 AM 1 °C 1 °C 98% 1026 hPa 0.5 kilometers SE 10.8 km/h / Heavy Fog
1:00 PM 3 °C 2 °C 94% 1025 hPa 4 kilometers East 14.4 km/h / Mist


Heavy, thick fog was at 10:00 AM, much later. Also, it is only 500 m. 500 m is enough for soft crash.. Somewhere, it says 80 m. Which is true?

You say "fast and hard" - Of course, any airplane crash will be hard - but, how hard? In 500 m visibility, landing at an airport can't be that hard. People in the airplane knowing the risk of landing would be taking some small protections for their lifes and probability of some people surviving from such softer hard crash is 1-5%. It is not a bomb, suddenly exploding..
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

Mist/Fog was reported the entire time.

Weather is reported entire time. As long as it is in allowable visibility limit, fog is usually not reported. This is a heavy fog, not light fog which shortens visibility distance to 80? m. Mist can't turn into heavy fog in an half an hour. And, there is no heavy fog reported before 06:00.
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

Mist turned into fog, it's only a difference in visibility. Visibility deteriorated even worse and it was reported by Minsk and then also later at the airfield.

I read somewhere (in one of Monia's post or on the net) that says fog started at around 00:10 in Smolensk. If this is true, then, it contradicts. However, it is possible that there was no fog till morning and mist might turn into fog. It happens usually in the mornings with the sunlights, heat.. But, this process takes more than hour and it is enough for met stations to know the fog. And, about half an hour, Yak crew was there. If they didn't see heavy fog, fog started to appear after 06:00, 06:10.. then, we hear "we just entered fog now" at 06:26.. Info chaos between Tu-154 probably then as people in the airplane weren't informed about the fog and since they didn't come up the probability of mist turning into fog, distrust by decision makers in the airplane to met stations and controllers happened. Perhaps, they thought that even if they pulled up, airplane would explode, by bombs inside airplane with remote controller and they tried their little chance, land dawn.. In this soft-crash, we can assume that at least 1-5% of people could survive.. Likely, it happened - and, the shot fire sounds heard in the video is about that..
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

The Russians were still going through their authority channels as to who was going so spray the fog ;) ;)

Artificial fog is possible. Real fog too might be there, possible. In the case of real fog, controllers in Warsaw and Yak crew should be questioned.. It is illogical to be sure about a heavy fog for an hour or more. Except 96 people, perhaps, everybody at control points knew the fog an hour ago or two. Heavy fog it is.. It takes an hour or two to occur naturally.

Whether it was artifical or natural, communications about the weather between people and stations are not normal, considering time differences/delays.
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

Is this "no guts, no glory" an explanation to why they went down the minimum? Is this "no guts, no glory" explanation recorded as data somewhere, in a blackbox, greenbox, whatever?

Just after the accident last year without any data yet, I too commented similarly, saying "pilot probably was forced to land by the president in the plane." It was quite possible that pilot had no chance; either he should have tried to land down or he should have lost his job if he didn't do that, and perhaps, more trouble. However, pressure of president on pilot isn't enough explanation, might be just extra irrelevant reasoning that may seem to everybody it was that reason only that pilot had to go down minimum. There are other questions, for ex, that president pressured on electronic circuits too, computer power too? etc etc.

At 06:26:18, the Tu-154 M the aircraft's commander (CC) shared the information about unfavourable weather conditions at SMOLENSK with the diplomatic protocol director, quote: ―Fog has appeared just now

Times. At somewhere, it says fog started to appear slowly at 00:10.
Then, Yak crew landed at 05:17 and the weather was not "asked" by controller in Warsaw. After about half an hour, he "asked"(?) weather condition in Smolensk. (If there was heavy fog, Yak crew should have informed Warsaw without being asked.) At around 05:50, talk/dialog about the weather between Warsaw and Yak crew happens. and Warsaw controller contacts Warsaw meteorology. But, there is no talk between Tu-154 and Warsaw about weather between 05:50 and 06:14/17. After 06:00, likely around 06:15, there is communication between Tu-154 and Minsk about the weather. This late communication isn't meaningful anyway. If we follow Warsaw's handling way about weather, then, it means there was no fog till 06:00 or 06:10.. Then, suddenly, we hear inside from airplane "fog just appears now", at 06:26 as you mentioned about. Then, there was a minute or two only to decide.. Quick decision should have been made.. "pull-up" command from smolensk controller was probably late or was just to fill the gap.. Main issue here isn't their decision in short time, it is "why there is an hour delay in becoming sure about the fog.."
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
Law / Kaczyński doubts the Euro currency will survive [49]

Incidentally, have Albright and Soros attempted to cripple Bosnia and Montenegro?

What? You mean it was Soros and his army who killed 200-250,000 people there?
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

I'm still wondering why no-one has given a credible explanation for why they busted their minimums yet.

It is same that you and those who say it was pilot's fault have not given a credible explanation for why they busted the minimum yet.

Questions unanswered are not only this. Also, why computer power went off before landing.

Anyway, Russians (whether it was accident or not) are always one step ahead of this story as they were ones who investigated everythings first. They won't take blame more than 50% even if it is accident and even if their fault is 90%. For that, they can change or hide some critical data so that Russians won't be blamed for the accident. Russians are always one step ahead in this story and they can easily manipulate all other datas, to generate further chaos.
NomadatNet   
5 Aug 2011
Love / How do Polish guys feel about having an older girlfriend/wife? [30]

I didn't do any judgement. Asked just a question.

You said "we've fallen in love."
Ok, then, why are you here to ask other people?
If you said "i've fallen in love", i could say somethings.
When you say "we've fallen in love", then, there is nothing to say.
NomadatNet   
4 Aug 2011
News / Polish final report on Smoleńsk aircrash [853]

Thirteen top Polish military officers have been fired, and a deputy defence minister has resigned, over last year's air disaster in western Russia.

Exactly a month ago, several key army generals in Russia too resigned by their pressures of President Medvedev and defense minister. Reason was said to be reforms in army and those key generals were said to be against the reforms. But, it is not unknown thing that the big countries tell different reasons than real reasons. Speculation here: can there be a connection to this Smolensk incident? It wasn't a news in mainstream media in the west and in the world except some small news websites.
NomadatNet   
4 Aug 2011
Law / Kaczyński doubts the Euro currency will survive [49]

President Kaczyński has recently cast doubt on whether the euro would survive in the long run.

Such doubts have been voiced by many. It doesn't show anything, whether a person saying positive or negative about Euro can be supporter of Euro or not. His words maybe were just a response, a message to someones at top levels in EU rather than the public.

Euro's main problem is it is money of a union, but, not everybody joined it. UK, Poland, etc etc. Especially, UK is important there cause you're an important member, but, you aren't joining Euro. So, if Euro resists, Sterling goes away or UK exists EU. Otherwise, Euro collapse and Europe return to old days.