History /
How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]
I note that you completely fail to address the 'with what' part of the question.
"In September 1939, the army had a total of 892,697 officers and men in both the full-time regular army and part-time Territorial Army."
Also, perhaps you can explain how the British, even if they had had the forces to do so, were supposed to launch an attack from French soil which the French did no want to be launched.
Ok, lets compromise. England is responsible for WW2 because the French wouldnt let them.
And i said that the British+French could have easily marched to Berlin in under 2 weeks.
So what?
I should just stop here.
Why did Poland fail to stop Germany from taking those actions?
Because Poland was not bound to. This is getting really tiresome.
Could you be so kind as to quote the exact sections of the treaty (or treaties) in question?
Nope, im too lazy to explain history to you again.
BTW, if we're talking about interbellum treaties, shall we go into the interbellum treaties which Poland broke? Perhaps the ones about not invading Czechoslovakia? Or the one about not selling the Ukrainians to the Soviets? Or the one about not invading Lithuania?
So you finally acknowledge that England broke treaties prior to WW2. Thank you.
No please admit that the English were pussies and we can end this.