jwojcie
18 Jan 2011
Travel / PKP (Polish National Railway) is a turn off [47]
Personally I would dissolve PKP XX and start again... nevertheless PKP Intercity is quite ok. PKP PR is different story though. PKP as whole is amalgam of issues, problems, etc...
As far as I know you can basically brake the issue into
1. PKP IC - expensive but usually with relatively good quality of service (it is train operator though so they are not responsible for tracks state)
2. [PKP] PR - inexpensive with very low quality of service, basically all what was bad was putted to that company
3. PKP PLK - basically tracks operator, seems to be unable to efficiently use funds for tracks modernization
4. various regional operators
Basically the idea with PKP PR was, that it would operate regionally, so mostly on not profitable routes but due to public importance partially funded by regional govs. Inability of PKP PR to give proper quality of service triggered formation/grow of regional operators for example Koleje Mazowieckie or Koleje Dolnoslaskie. Anyway I see the light in here. On the other hand I don't see how PR can survive in the long run when one by one voivodeships (main stakeholders in PR) are forming their own operators...
PS. actually I've learnt funny thing: PR is no longer PKP, it is company entirely belonging to voivodeships and it current name is:
Przewozy Regionalne Sp. z o.o.
Personally I would dissolve PKP XX and start again... nevertheless PKP Intercity is quite ok. PKP PR is different story though. PKP as whole is amalgam of issues, problems, etc...
As far as I know you can basically brake the issue into
1. PKP IC - expensive but usually with relatively good quality of service (it is train operator though so they are not responsible for tracks state)
2. [PKP] PR - inexpensive with very low quality of service, basically all what was bad was putted to that company
3. PKP PLK - basically tracks operator, seems to be unable to efficiently use funds for tracks modernization
4. various regional operators
Basically the idea with PKP PR was, that it would operate regionally, so mostly on not profitable routes but due to public importance partially funded by regional govs. Inability of PKP PR to give proper quality of service triggered formation/grow of regional operators for example Koleje Mazowieckie or Koleje Dolnoslaskie. Anyway I see the light in here. On the other hand I don't see how PR can survive in the long run when one by one voivodeships (main stakeholders in PR) are forming their own operators...
PS. actually I've learnt funny thing: PR is no longer PKP, it is company entirely belonging to voivodeships and it current name is:
Przewozy Regionalne Sp. z o.o.