History / Jaruzelski vs Pinochet [120]

There's one thing the leftists don't mention.

During the deposed president Allende's rules the level of leftist attacks on ordinary people, mainly richer grew rapidly. That was supported by many Cuban and Soviet agents.

And silently supported by the authorities.
Chile was at the edge of revolution in pure Soviet style.
Trouble is that Chilean constitution did NOT know the idea of legal deposing the president - impeachment.
That is why a large group of MPs actually asked the army to defend the law and depose the bandit Allende and his henchmen by force.

Jaruzelski was a communist, Soviet puppet and dictator ruling in the country by serving its occupants against his countrymen.

Sunglasses and general's rank are the only similarities

History / Jaruzelski vs Pinochet [120]

A new commie tacticts - accusing of boring people when telling about their atrocities. That won't succeed.

History / Jaruzelski vs Pinochet [120]

Read my first post.

Pinochet did the coup because the Parliament urged him to do so as there was no legal way of deposing the mad commie Allende.
And after some time as the situation was better, gave his powers back to the nation.
Jaruzelski was a commie traitor that took power to stop the Poles getting their independence back.

History / Jaruzelski vs Pinochet [120]


This is rather unusual when the whole Parliament agrees on sth, isn't it?
Haven't you heard about the required majority?

History / The reasons of Polish pride? [112]

Cause we are brave, fighting enemies through generations and often beating them when they outnumbered us.