The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Ironside  

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - A
Last Post: 3 Nov 2025
Threads: Total: 53 / Live: 27 / Archived: 26
Posts: Total: 13894 / Live: 7283 / Archived: 6611
From: The Royal Palace of Warsaw
Speaks Polish?: Better than most

Displayed posts: 7310 / page 226 of 244
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Ironside   
26 Jun 2011
UK, Ireland / Polish and East European prostitutes in the UK [240]

You are becoming sloppy Sean. That would be more Seanus-like sentence

I would say that your interest guide your steps and because of that you tend to stumble upon slutty prostitutes

shame on you :)
Ironside   
26 Jun 2011
UK, Ireland / Polish and East European prostitutes in the UK [240]

well, Rebut can me in secret what your previous screen name was?
On PF there are aplenty of such threads and topics, just use a search function.
I would say that your interest guide your steps and because of that you tend to stumble upon slutty prostitutes.
Seriously, I suggest that you pay for an sociological survey if you are really interested in a credible answer.
Ironside   
26 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

What I am?

Whatever you are my dear, you are seriously messed up and I don't see any point of discussing history with you of which you obviously do not know much about.

nd who thinks it was ok to destroy 1000yrs of history and replace it with socialistic shoe boxes

Would you like to quote my words where I said that, or admit that you are lying.
That would be proof of your sincerity and I would be willing to correct your erroneous views, if not then you can go and play with yourself for all I care:)
Ironside   
26 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

free to claim Wladimir Pawlowski was Austrian,

Never heard about him, and given Austrian past he could well be an Austrian.
Even if he wasn't, so what ?

The latest "cleansing" of Jews in poland took place in 1968 and the poles so far didn"t offer any compensantion for those holocaust survivor"s and descendents they kicked out of the country - want to talk to those people?

At last size able number of them should be talk to by an investigator to explain they role they played in soviet regime in Poland.

And nobody kick them out at the gun point, they could stay.
However it is a highly abstractive subject - I don't consider that to be part of the Polish history, rather a history of Poland under Soviet rule.

for Polish Concentration camps I cordially invite you to visit Ruda Slaska (amongst other places)

Well, they were hardly Polish Concentrations camps.

many Germans didn't flee in panic, they were kicked out by Poles who took over their property

Yeah, many didn't and were kicked out - nobody deny it.What is your point ?

There you'd have your polish Nazi.

He would be a German Nazi and Polish Traitor :)

Well, the Nazis, Hitler and all wasn't imposed on Germans by a foreign power, and implemented by a foreign army and bayonets. No foreign army was backing Hitler;s degree's and thugs but German.

so, hahaha in your face :) Get your facts straights first!
Antisemitism a deeply rooted polish thing ?
Hhahah in your face again ! What are you anyway ?

Then talk to former inmates before they pass away. Ruda Slaska was a polish concentration camp (with survival rates close to Ausschwitz) until 1953!

Really ? From 1945 Poland was an Soviet run pupped state, at the same time the biggest Polish heroes were being murdered by soviets - so think twice about calling that camp - Polish !

These were mostly innocent people, so they should get their property back unless they were party members.

They payed for the action of their government. IF you have a beef with the way they had been treated, I suggest you call GB, USA and Russia government's . Because it was decisions of their predecessors, not Poland's.
Ironside   
17 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

So in essence you are telling me that you will not accept any number or any source, as long as it can't tell you exactly how many Germans were killed, when and where - if possible with a name, photo, eye witness report and accompanying death certificate? Well, I guess we can retire all historians then...

Now, don't be absurd. I can accept a reasonable estimation done by professionals.
What I refuse to do is accept numbers which comes from equation :
The Number of civilians before end of the war on certain territories and the number of civilians from those territories after the war, it tells us nothing!

What about the passage of the Red Army, doesn't that account for most of those 500,000 missing ?
You tell me......
So, far you have your theory and I have mine, both plausible, but mine slightly more than yours, eh?
Ironside   
16 Jun 2011
Life / Are Polish roads really this bad? [237]

So, why is that?

gee, due to corruption - no wonder that all hate Kaczynski because he was going after corrupted!
Ironside   
16 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

You cannot deny the fact that there was a large number of casualties amongst German civilians after the end of the war.

A large number of casualties amongst German civilians is an enigmatic expression which tell us exactly nothing !
After the end of the war - that better!
Are you in possession of sources that can tell us actual number of killed after the war? That would be basics on which we could discus further , otherwise is only stipulation.

What I would like to see, is the number of German civilians killed after the war in Poland.

Yes, there were rapes, robbery's and sometimes killings of deportees done by some demoralized by the war Poles.
Nothing near 500 000 , though!
As I said that number is a summary of all death from the territories they were being deported. Which means that includes killed during the war as well.

Not too worry, as soon as there will be credible book on the subject. I will read that and accept 5, 50, 500 or 5000 victims of Poles - no bother! The point is I will not accept stipulations and estimations based on tin air!
Ironside   
16 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

Yes, rounding up Jews and packing them into cattle trucks off to the death camps was a perfectly acceptable thing to do. Oh, sorry, yet another inconvenient part of Polish history....

Sure Harry any prove ? eh? lies and lies ?
rounding up ? they were already in ghettos if so packing and rounding were being done by Jewish police !

Deny, deny, deny, and keep denying!

Any Poles working for Soviets was a traitor, so what your issue Harry ? Deny what exactly ? What is that you want? but really.... no more BS!

Yes & Pilsudski didn't want Poland & Fran

listen if you are really polish shut your trap!
Ironside   
16 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

Half a million was on the lower end of the estimates, and you know that.

Yes but German's were repulsed from Baltic states, Hungary, Romania, Czechoslovakia and finally Poland. Do you those 500 000 death want to blame on Poles? Fine, where is your prove ?

The fact is that Germans count their death summarily. It doesn't say for example whatever death occurred in 1944 or 1945 or 1946, majority of killed were happened during the war.

And that case would not stand a chance in court !
Erica that lovely lady forgot conveniently that she was conceived and spend first years of her life spend in the apartment stolen from a Polish owner who was kick out and deported if not killed. Hypocrite !

As for using incorrect nomenclature, your link only shows that present definition is being challenged but it has no bearing on the cases from the past!
Ironside   
16 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

Well, that is only YOURspeculationsso far Harry !
Nobody is stopping you from hiring some historian to research that subject!

But to Polish sources he is Belorussian. What was I saying about denial?

Not only Polish sources but also German. Let say, he was Polish - so what ?

A few hundred actually, but that fact is also inconvenient, let's sweep it away.

That a few clearly shows your bias and prejudice sunshine, two hundred. There was documentary in Polish TV about that, few years ago. So, your claim about sweeping it away is burst

The term "concentration camp" was used by contemporary media to describe the camps in question. But it is easier to simply deny that fact.

What fact? The fact that before WWII there was political prison in Poland, and if you want to call it concentration camp to maliciously bring connotations with German camps from the times of WWII.

Sure, all you did was ban their language, close their schools, close their churches, close their libraries, close their reading rooms, ban their organisations

Not that bad, considering times and circumstances - maybe not nice and I do not condone that but not that bad. Once again, nobody denies that, well nobody is going about it round the clock, but your claim that it is not dealt with is empty and invalid.

ban their organisations and send anybody who objected too loudly to a concentration camp. None of that is bad!

Yes, terrorist organizations or organizations closely associated with terrorists !

The fact is that there were several. But it is easier to deny again.

Several ? When? After WWII camps was run by Soviets and traitors. Poles were in those camps as the victims along with others !

Really? Could you be so kind as to point out the US law which said that Jews could only sit on certain benches in universities?

Fine, but those practices () started in 1937 and there hardly been time to implement them before 1939. Again, hardly a secret, some do goodies and other pussies ram that down our throats every now and then, probably because it was about Jews. Hardly a big deal considering.As for others countries (not that it matters):

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerus_clausus#Numerus_clausus_in_the_United_States

The Blue Police perhaps

Police was OK!

The Świętokrzyżka brigade maybe?

They were doing a good job !
Harry, what is your issue ? Time to confess:)
Ironside   
16 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

Ethnic cleansing of the German population ... BUT the Russians were responsible, and the Germans fled anyway.

Fine, let deal with that first.
You use incorrect term of ethnic cleaning to describe what happened after 1945.
Ethnic cleansingis a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas

Whereas you are talking about:
Population transfer is the movement of a large group of people from one region to another by state policy or international authority, most frequently on the basis of ethnicity or religion.

Term ethnic cleansing is new term, adopted after civil war in Yugoslavia.

Population transfer was a legal measure in the eyes of the international law until 1949. When such transfer if involuntary lost blessing of legality.
If you want fair and honest discussion on the subject you cannot use such imprecise or/and prejudiced language.

Primo, Russia, Britain and USA are directly responsible for so called expulsion of Germans, that is unquestionable fact - do you want to argue this????

Secondly that fate was at the time shared by other nations including Poles. More, Germans first used expulsion against Poles kicking them out from parts of the occupied Poland.

Thirdly, German civilians flee in the face of advancing Red Army.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_Germans_after_World_War_II

Well, it happened, do you want Poles to apologize or feel responsible for that eh?

Pomerania and Silesia were annexed ... BUT we Poles weren't asked, and since the Piasts (or whatever they were called) owned the lands 10,000 years ago we call them regained territories anyway.

Well, Poles weren't asked. However I fully support that acquisition of Prussian territories for a number of reasons.
Nevertheless that argument would be a strong one if not for one single detail - at the same time Poland lost even bigger territory to Soviets.

There were labor camps in Poland after the war which came very close to what is considered a concentration camp

That is not argument that admittance of being ignorant - those labor camps were used for Poles from patriotic and notable families, at the same time officers and soldiers of Polish forces, heroes of Resistance against Germans were being fight, imprisoned and murdered. Poland turned into Soviet colony. Those who were running and directing labor camps were criminals and traitors who should be shot.

You do not expect seriously Poles to take responsibility for that eh?

There is always an excuse - never ever do certain people on PF admit that their own country might have some skeletons in its historical closet, too.

Yeah, I agree on that, Poles have a tendency to deny some facts. I think due to complexes and wannabe MR Nice obsession :)
I can admit whatever there is skeletons or not, but you must be serious about it. I will not admit something just because you think I should ie skeleton must be there !:)

All this ends up in the Google index for everybody out there to find and read

by all means the google are answer to everything :)
Ironside   
15 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

Iron, I think you are way too sensitive.

Sensitive not really, I'm a bit tied of the repetitive Harry's stuff, let get to the bottom of that.

There are traitors in every nation. Same with szabrownicy.

I know, and I did ask Harry - so what if there was 100 or 1000 traitors ?No answer mind you! :)
We should be taking about traitors during the commie times, not about not that kosher Poles during WWII>all death anyway.

No nation of people has done so much good & so little bad as Poles.

Even if overtly that maybe the truth it is one of those nuts hard to crack, ie to prove!
I do appreciate your love of country you don't really know but a little less enthusiasm, ie, chill dude !
Most important you are off-topic - see above the topic subject ? One more outburst of your puppyish enthusiasm and I will report you to mods and you will end in the bin - understood ?>
Ironside   
15 Jun 2011
History / So called "inconvenient parts" of Polish history - what do you think? [158]

Some people on PF and in real life keep insisting that Poland and Poles did not deal with so called inconvenient parts of Polish history.

I wonder what they have in mind. Do they think about general knowledge about history in Poland? Which means simplified into almost postcard-like snaps of bits and pieces from the Polish History shown on TV or in newspapers.

Maybe that have in mind group of professional historians or people deeply interested in Polish history?
Which I don't know.
For example:

Polish SS. Poles who took an active part in the holocaust. Polish concentration camps. Post-war treatment of Germans. Interbellum treatment of all ethnic minorities. State-sponsored anti-semitism. The genesis of the Final Solution. Shall I go on?

I know nothing about Poles in SS. Given example of an individual recognized by the Interned sources (both German and Polish)as an Belorussian.
Attempt to recruit from Highlanders drew few volunteers but came to nothing.
Polish concentrations camps are either fallacy in understanding or bias and a bad intend. Poland only political prison could be hardly called concentration camp let alone concentrations camps, regardless nomenclature its existence is no secrets to any-one, Poles are learning about it in school.

Post-war treatment of Germans is a hardly a secret,only problem is in numbers, because many Germans fled in panic as RED ARMY entered German territory.Nowadays those are put on Poles shoulders which is nonsense.

Treatment of minorities in Poland before WWII wasn't that bad, question of opinion, and no secret either, if somebody wanted could learn about it.

As for construct State-sponsored anti-semitism don't know what author had in mind, but if my guess is correct I should point out that USA had the same laws for much longer than Poland.

The genesis of the Final Solution [i][/i] no clue
Shall I go on?[
By all means go!

I would think that part of history in need of study are the times of communism in Poland ie Soviet occupation.
Also in dire need study and publication are countless heroic deeds during German occupation of Poland done by Resistance from the Home Army and National Forces.

By all means lets the discussion begins!
Ironside   
22 May 2011
Life / The Legacy of Polish Poster design [36]

I was hoping for a stimulating discussion. Meaning:an exchange of arguments, facts and views.
It is disappointing that all you came with is a well know game of labelling. You stick some labels on me and in return I will stick some labels on you. Thank you I pass.

It would be nice if you did me courtesy of reading my post, as I did read yours - not only admiring pictures I posted.

I'm not speaking for Poles, I speak for myself. I don't deny that some Poles may viewed or view it the way you described but I'm still claiming that said similarity is only superficial.

If we talking the times of the winged hussars, they were all business like professional winners and their spirit come from countless battles which ended with their victory.

Whereas Indian's warrior spirit come from their way of life and their beliefs.
Ironside   
21 May 2011
Life / The Legacy of Polish Poster design [36]

Ironside, you underestimate the complexity of the Plains Indian society.

Maybe I'm, however with all their internal and spiritual complexity society of the Plains Indians was pretty simple, no social classes. Simply speaking lack of the factors necessary for existence of civilisation.

The Plains Indians by having domesticated and militarized the horse became the central continental overlords of North America just as the Poles did in central Europe with their own variety of artillery supported equestrian based military technology.

Polish power wasn't based on her military power, for most of her Golden Age, military power was used only for defence purposes, most historians are in concert that one of the downfall of Poland's Power was anti-militaristic attitude of majority of her citizen (nobles).

If Poland would had utilized her riches and potentials, without even straining herself would have had been able to handle all her neighbours.
Military power was there only to provide security for advanced and complex society based on knowledge, agriculture and technology unsuppressed in the world.
Overlords of North America is only an exaggerated expression, which means that because of their numbers, warrior culture and vacuum caused by white men advance into North America which caused havoc therefore wiping out and pushing aside other Indians.Because of all that their ruling "so to speak" was unchallenged.

In no point their overlord-ship meant more than a passing gallop of their horses.

The parallels are there for anyone with eyes to see, but you insist upon the distinguishing the Plains Indians as primitive and the Poles as civilized in a myopic manner.

What parallels you are talking about ?Use of horses and feathers? Well, I can grant you that, but further than that its only confabulation.
There is nothing myopic in my approach, I'm just taking a stand against comparing everything with everything, it makes no sense and is counter-productive.

I did not call Indians primitive on purpose, but their nomadic lifestyle, and even more their ancient but remote culture put them entirely on a different plane of existence than Polish civilization.

That: against that ?:

The first one doesn't even needs his horse to ridicule your comparison.
Ironside   
21 May 2011
Life / The Legacy of Polish Poster design [36]

The similarity between Plains Indians and Poles stems from an innate spirit of aristocratic cockiness that both peoples share which is essential rather than superficial.

Poles don't have spirit of aristocratic cockiness,so called national character was shaped by spirit of freedom and citizenship, enjoyed by Polish nobles.
So, called cockiness and spirit it is quality due to Polish Royal Army and its knights-soldiers. IT is a soldierly quality and spirit, which has been an overplayed factor due to unfurtunate circumstances of Poland in later years.

Poles, their bards and storytellers hummed that tune of free chivalrous warrior, knight in shiny armour and all that to enchant kids with an idea of Poland.

In fact a real Polish cavalryman had been superior due to original tactics, close cooperation and support of infantry and artillery combined together into Polish Way of Welfare. And due to superior armour, sabre, musket and artillery all that providable by the country, and only a tiny percent of the nobles were directly involved in wars.

Whereas Indians where free warriors, free in a tribal and nomadic (or half-nomadic)way.
Their free spirit was primal and fruit of culture where norms could not be to strict because members of the group would vote with their feet (and often did - many tribes and sub-tribes of American Indians). When on the other hand ,Poland's free spirit was a fruit of complex and rich civilisation with laws, custom and legislations - civilisation which dominated for 400 years half of the European continent.

Not the same thing.
Ironside   
21 May 2011
Life / The Legacy of Polish Poster design [36]

The boastful, expertly equestrian, Plains Indians bedecked in feathers are actually very very similiar to Poles when one thinks about it.

Only on the surface, only on the surface dear DesEss !
Ironside   
19 May 2011
Law / Weapons laws in Poland. Carrying a concealed handgun? [918]

3. Solidarity won the Polish independence in 1989, completely unarmed.

Solidarity won ? Hey ! Why nobody told me ?

As for weapons is Poland.
Everyone above 24 years of age should be able to buy a gun.Provided he/she has no criminal record, history of mental illnesses and is employed.

Why not?

I like your post.
Ironside   
17 May 2011
History / Were Nobles during Commonwealth constituting the Nation of Poland? [37]

On paper yes. But if a lets say Mr Potocki wanted the tiny little village of the poor Mr Piotrowski he took it by sword, and then bribed his way out of the court.

Not necessarily, but you are right, somebody rich, connected and powerful have a better chance to get away with crime, but it is also the truth of our times.

In France or England if some simple or not so simple noble said publicly that King's policy is wrong, he was finished, quite literately, in Poland (Commonwealth - not so). Small but significant difference.

That's the reason why the Szlachta wanted foreign monarchs. Why have strong king with power that will make you his puppet while you can have a weak king that will be your puppet?

The reasons were a bit more complex than that!But the main reason of looking for a foreign prince was lack of suitable candidates inside Commonwealth, or at last majority of the nobles thought so.

Ukies

What ukies?

polish gun:

s-

hairy chest of your Cossack against :

d-
Ironside   
17 May 2011
News / Achievements of the Tusk's Polish government [538]

If you feel it is too much education for you, tell me and I will ease up a little. :):):)

pawian, I just said that yours translation is not good and I have provided a better one, you can take it or leave it!

I see.

No, you don't she is a Polish Ukrainian,huh ?

Governments can only make the opportunities for individual success or limit such opportunities.

Exactly, and the current government is doing a particularly shity job!
Ironside   
16 May 2011
History / Were Nobles during Commonwealth constituting the Nation of Poland? [37]

In case of Commonwealth it was their rights, which made them standing out not only from other social group but from other nobles in Europe and the world. They had a rights not unlike Roman citizens of old, no matter poor or rich, every noble enjoyed the same rights. Freedom breeds a different kind of men.

I read the linked article above and while it was only a tiny part of the article, it seemed to indicate that modern historians doubt that the nobility descended from Samatians:

To be honest nobody really investigated nobles from that angle.

I wonder if there are any genetic studies done on surviving Polish nobility to investigate the question from that aspect.

none that I'm aware of ...
I think that is a quite possible that some Sarmatians in times immemorial consisted an nucleus of group which latter become nobles. I wouldn't overestimated ethnic aspect of the Polish nobles, I think that Polish nobles were mix if you would think about ethnic aspect. What counted was culture, traditions and customs; interesting thought to ponder, whatever some elements of Sarmatian culture or ethos survived intertwined into a rich tradition of Polish nobles.

(So much gridlock with the veto and the meddling into Polish elections by other countries).

I would put the blame on the foreign origin of elected monarchs. They had no understanding of Polish constitution nor the will to work according to the guidelines of the law in Poland, and they used their prerogatives to muddle about and corrupt the system and the people.