The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Ironside  

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - A
Last Post: 3 Nov 2025
Threads: Total: 53 / Live: 27 / Archived: 26
Posts: Total: 13894 / Live: 7283 / Archived: 6611
From: The Royal Palace of Warsaw
Speaks Polish?: Better than most

Displayed posts: 7310 / page 204 of 244
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Ironside   
24 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Towards the end of the war they were looking for anybody to fight the Soviets (1943-1944). Fact is that the Nazis have been trying to approach Polish Underground and convince them to fight against Soviets. Details are little hazy but that proposition has been rejected, yet until the Warsaw Rising Germans kept that option open.

They captured general "Arrow" Rowecki the first commander of the Home Army and over a year were holding him and were trying to convince him to German option. when the rising started he was executed.
Ironside   
23 May 2013
UK, Ireland / London is Poland's 24th largest city [85]

However you want to phrase it, I'm sure you know the point I was trying to make.

Sure I do the old "bloody foreigners" complex. I just wonder what is has to do with reality? I mean people of London are for the most part immigrants or born to immigrant parents, grandparents and so on. Then there are people who migrated to London from other parts of the country. So ingenious residents of London are in minority if they exist at all as London has been for centuries melting pot for people from all walks of life and gene-pool.

Also you are laboring here under misconception that the UK government and the UK elite somehow give a flying copulation what commoners and plebeians think. Sure they are fast enough when there is a need to apse them and to keep them in line and contend to some extend but in reality they don't really care. I mean who has been affected by the influx of foreigners and who gained ? You can answer that one yourself I'm sure.

Also, do you think that an average Pole (and one able to read English) would think twice about what some Anglik in some borough think about him/her commencing to work in the UK?For him/her the clear indication would be availability of work, whether or not that work is legal and that about it.

The only way to stop further influx of people form the EU would be voting the UKIP into power. Which I think unlikely.
There is out there are people like you harping on about foreigners and immigrants and this or that. In fact they are powerless and impotent and they know that.

Instead they chose to vent their frustration on this or other internet forum to no avail.
I mean if you want implement some changes you need to change your country policy. I would think that one would be obvious cause ******* on immigrants do not help and there are always a chance they will **** back.

By the way feel free to come back here any time to say the same but I would like to listen to something new for a change. :)
Ironside   
18 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Hitler was an Austrian that joined the German army, rather than the Austrian army, in WW1 because he didn't want to serve in an army containing such a high percentage of Slavs.

Rather because he admired Prussic Empire.

Indeed, threads like this one, that proport to give "answers" to questions involving massive counter-factuals, may be interesting to read but these answers have absolutely no historical value. History is about what actually happened and no one can claim to know the truth about how WW2 would've turned out if the titular counter-factual had actually happened.

That is obviously what if qestion and none is pretending otherwise.
Although that could be interesting as a means to find out rationale behind Poland decision to refute German offer of alliance. So far it seems like a mistake.

It is even more pressing that you know as Poland at the moment is in fact German close "partner" not to say "younger partner". Question:

Was all those sacrifices and looses including lost of half of Polish territory and then 46 years of Soviet occupation were all for nought as Poland is back in the square one and in close relationship with Germany.

True but we can only wonder how it would look like if he won the war.

well would he won or would he just destroyed Soviets? that is the qestion for which there is no answer.
Only suggestion that given more time the western powers and the USA would have to really put their back into it and win the war in fact.
Ironside   
18 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Don't give me this quote crap... read between the lines, Hitler insinuates that the Germanic people are Aryan and not the "lower peoples" ...

Well you can read between the lines or even between pages if you want but the fact remain that there isn't any such quote in Hitler's book. You have been caught.

The fact is that Hitler classified people as lower or not according to his whims with an exception of Jews and Bolsheviks.

Why would Poland accept Hitler's agreement, when there is so much hostility towards East Prussia?

What are you talking about?

ust because there is no exact sentence to reference that, does not mean that the entirety of the book could not insinuate that.

Hitler wanted Poland in his camp. He wanted to use them to fight Soviets whom he seen as communist in his mind it equalled the world Jewry.

His beef with Poland and Poles came to be about the fact that Poland resisted him and fought hard against him. For Hitler they action were irrational as he offered Poland alliance.

I read it and although he didn't say sub human he detested Slavs

Yet he worked with Slovakia and Croatia all right. Even Czechs were not that badly treated as Poles. In fact they were doing all right in comparison.
Ironside   
16 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

And one clearly aimed at Delph and I.

If you say so. I don't see the connection but you know better I'm sure.

I see you're lying yet again: he was talking about the descendants of peasants?

nah he is harping about peasants this or that as if there was something wrong with being a one or having such ancestry, what wrong with peasants? Nothing, only bigot could even imply that.

Either way, just go to eastern Poland and you'll see more peasants than farmers. Peasants in Poland even have their own political party; the pre-war leader of that party had fairly firm views about Poland accepting Hitler's offer, which is one of the reasons the Nazis locked him up.

How are you distinguishing between peasants and farmers?Do you measure their sculls? Ask them? What?
PSL? It suppose to be party for farmers.Where from did you get this peasant thingy, that historical expression.
Ironside   
16 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Good to see that you still have no idea who Delph and I are

Never said a word about you or delph. That was just exercise in hyperbole.
I know what you are Harry.

Anybody who claims that there were Nazi-Polish invasions is clearly a liar: there was only one occasions that the Poles and the Nazis invaded the same country at the same time.

So what you are fretting about?

are unpleasant racist bigots;

like delph harping about peasants? very pleasant, not bigoted and not racist at all, especially if some Aberdeen gangsta keep saying that. In Poland there are no peasant anymore, there are farmers.
Ironside   
16 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

we can't have facts getting in the way of an opportunity to jump on Polish shadows - indoctrination by Western propaganda,

What one can expect form a colonial of German extraction who is ashamed of his former country and some gutter swept from the outer fringes of the globe. Hypothetically speaking - off course.

Yes, they were the same Ukrainians, those loyal to the government headed by Symon Petlyura.

No, Poland have been fighting with one bunch of Ukrainians who had no communication with the other bunch headed by Petlura. so not quite the same Ukrainians. One were subjects of Hapsburg and other has been Tzar subjects.

Local councils which were absorbed by the relevant national governments with the national governments taking on the rights and responsibilities of the bodies which they had absorbed. If Poland had objected to the requirements of the interim agreement, Poland should have stated that at the time, rather than just ignoring the bits it didn't like.

Skip the nonsense. the fact is that said territory enjoyed Polish majority, the fact is that Czechoslovakia government agreed to divide that territory according to the ethnic borders, the fact is that they lied and chested and in effect used force to gain their objective.

Now, you are anti-Polish taken stance that somehow Poles were to blame.

has done quite a bit of work to help Poland and pays taxes here while you do none of those things?

delusion of grander kaffir?
Your financial arrangements and the place you sleep and shyte has nothing to do with the fact that you are taking anti-Polish stance on PF.
Ironside   
15 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

First of all Polish central government constituted on and after 11th of November, so you are talking about action taken by some local organizations.
Polish and Czechoslovakian governments agreed on border based on ethnic boundaries.
Czechoslovakia claims were just a flimsy excuse for an armed aggression.

As usual, I will now challenge you to produce a quote in which I tell a lie and to explain what makes it a lie (as I have done with your lie about Poland taking Polish land in 1938). As usual you will either claim 'it is obvious' or 'I don't have time' or just throw out more insults.

you are a troll, i own you nothing. Given the fact that you are always taking anti-Polish makes it a pleasure.

9 was against the same Ukrainians with whom Poland later signed an alliance and then stabbed in the back by selling them and their country to the Soviets.

you seems not to be grasping a fact that they wasn't the same Ukrainians. (what is wrong with you?)What country? what backstabbing? what it has to do with the issue debated

No debate there. However, the Polish broke the treaty first and then rejected Czechoslovak requests that they stop breaking it. Simple as that.

no that was Polish ethnic territory and Czechoslovakia government under flimsy excuse used their armed forces to get it - simple like that.
Ironside   
15 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Polish forces invaded Czech territory in 1918 and then Poland ignored the interim peace treaty. How is that tit for tat?!

What Czechoslovakia territory? Are you telling me that Poland signed territorial agreement with Czechoslovakia prior to 1918?
So stop lying Harry.

Yet another lie from you: Britain had no alliance whatsoever with Czechoslovakia to honour when the Nazis and Poles decided they were going to invade Czechoslovakia and occupy Czechoslovakian territory.

Yet she felt need to broke a deal with Mr Hitler. Why? Because she had a close alliance with France and if France would have been involved in war with Germany they would have to follow their suit.

all is connected Harry and if you fail to see that you have no place to debate history shoo troll.

I see that you are lying again: Poland took territory that Poland had agreed was part of Czechoslovakia. The land that Poland took was not Polish, it was Czechoslovakian, as even the state of Poland had agreed when signing the international treaty confirming that fact.

At the stage Czechoslovakia surrendered their sovereignty to international bodies and give up a large chunk of their territory without the fight. The only fair would be take back area with predominately Polish population and which had been stolen by Czechoslovakia by stabbing Poland in the back during her war with the Soviets in 1920.

Maybe they should wait and obtain such paper as given to Mr Hitler by the western powers to make good and legal his claim. I'm sure they would do just that if only they knew about your bureaucratic streak.

To be sure Poland's government obtained such paper from the Czechoslovakia government if that ease your pain.
Well I don't expect pan-European to understand complexity and quirks of the European history.
By the way what had happened with your country?
Ironside   
15 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

No, I mean that Poland and the Nazis both invaded parts of Czechoslovakia;

If you are implying some kind of agreement between those two you are wrong.

Trying to deflect the issue

trying to imply things and making big issue out of small border dispute is a clear sign that some trolls here are bored.
Fall of Czechoslovakia came in two stages, in the first stage Germans took The Sudetenland and Poland their Cieszyn.The Second stage seen de-integration of Czechoslovakia as a state and then when so called invasion had happened and Poland had no part in the stage two.

There is the thing, Poland paid Czechoslovakia tit for tat.
The Czechoslovakian government in pre-war times snubbed Poland many times believing themselves safe. They calculated that Poland is in danger from both Germany and Soviets, whereas Czechoslovakia seen only Germany as a potential danger and lulled themselves into false sense of security believing that have pretty sound and cordial relation with Soviets.

Also Czechoslovakian government for most part of the early XX century was a darling of western powers mainly France.They considered themselves being in a close and cordial alliance with France.

When out of the blue they have been sold down the river and they long standing ally though nothing of betraying them.
Here came part I don't understand. Seeing how so called western powers are treating their long standing and praised ally, how they disregard their oblivions how they easily exchanged honour for convenience without even as much as a bating an eyelid. How they could have take their empty promised as a face value and how they could have refuse Hitler's offers and overtures.

It is clear that it was the only rational course of action at the time.
what were they thinking?
That is the qestion.
Ironside   
15 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Either way, I note that not even you can bring yourself to deny that Poland joined with the Nazis in invading Czechoslovakia in 1938.

Joined? If you mean that they meet in conflict that you are right. But it wasn't some space Nazis but Germans, repeat Harry Germans.

Faux-Polish Patriots: Hypocrisy gone wild.

Where is your country Harry? If you have none stop be jealous and talk smack about something you have no idea about.

Too bad that Poland was willing to argue over areas that were neither here nor there rather than forming a military alliance that might have helped both countries. As I said, the II RP's diplomacy was absolutely dreadful - was 250,000 people really worth the consequences?

Stop repeating that rubbish, how often your came backs are just sad and dry repetitions of already overused repertoire, you should learn as you go along and I'm sure that that qestion has been explained thoughtfully, only idiot or a person with malicious intent would saying things that he know to be untrue.

An alliance with Ukraine would certainly have helped too, if Poland hadn't sold independent Ukraine to the USSR anyway.

Such country never existed so couldn't have been sold. I see that you are up to your lies and trick.
Repeat after me Germans.

This nonsense view that criticising Polish history somehow makes you "Polonophobic" is nothing but the rantings of a deluded minority.

Criticizing? you are an ignorant but cheeky m***** who do know that much about Polish history and who do not understand history at all. The only one deluded is you.

We have two anti -Polish dudes in this thread. Anybody care to guess their names?[b][/b]
Ironside   
14 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

awn. Still trying to claim that Poland didn't join with the Nazis in invading Czechoslovakia, I see. Why do you insist on trying to excuse the inexcusable Chris?

stop lying about Chris post, after all everybody can read his post and your pathological lies are quite transparent.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Or perhaps it could be due to your ignorance of air-war related topics?

Nah i will stick with my version.

If you wish to claim that a full-scale attack could have been launched by British forces at that time, I do expect you to go into detail about what attack could, in your opinion, have been launched.

stop that nonsense I'm not British war office from the period. They would tell you what they could do in details if they ever planned for that, but they didn't and neither did France they simply duped Poland.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

The work done by historians who know quite a bit more about this topic than you do very much say otherwise.

any links or books?

The first British jet flew in 1941. The first British combat jet flew in 1943 and entered service in 1944.

Did they now? Never heard about it. Must be because of their negligible impact on the war.

Do feel most welcome to go into detail about the full offensive that the British could have launched then.

What? do you want the details of something that never materialism? Very much like attaching gross of their forced to the attack and please do not put France out of the equation.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Please do not make that untrue claim that France and Britain failed to help Poland in the way that they were contractually required to do. As for the Soviet Union, I am unaware of any pacts of mutual assistance between the UK and the USSR.

we are talking - what if here Harry!
If Poland and Germany would have attacked Soviets would Britain and France take part in the war at the stage attaching themselves to Soviet and if so would that attack Germany? I doubt that.

The only way to help Poland in 1939 would be full fledged offensive - so yes they failed to help Poland - end of story.

And that plane would have been going up against British jets.

In 1944 or in 1943? British had no jets before Germans.

Not at all: different units flying different planes in different roles against different enemy aircraft types will have differing rates of actual kill to claimed kill on different days, and that's before you factor in differences in different air forces as to what could actually be claimed as a kill.

Still percentage would not be altered much.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

And then there's the question of what effect those Polish pilots would have been if Poland had allied with the Nazis

It all depends whether France and Britain would attack Germany over Soviets like they didn't do it for Poland.

Would the Luftwaffe really have let Poles play with their toys?

No need, given the time Poland would develop their own fighter-plane that already had in the prototype stage.

Doing that shows that the percentages most certainly do change

well that would be highly unlikely.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

I think that all rules were there to establish the real number of kills. Putting it all down to implied inferior methods of verification in Polish air forces is just a nonsense.

The same goes for RAF - they claimed more kills than there had been real kills.
All that has no real impact on percentage and that is clear for anybody who know their ass from their elbow.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

He quotes claimed kills, not actual kills. On that particular day 303 claimed 13 kills from a total number of allied claims of 34 planes but actual German losses were only nine planes.

well wouldn't be percentage be the same regardless of the numbers of planes.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Do you happen to have a source for that? My understanding is that on that day 303 squadron actually 'accounted for' 145% of German losses.

Norman Davies Rising 44 p 38.

clearly they needed no retaining at all.

That is not what I said. Surely undisciplined is in this case just a qestion of perspective or a one point of view.
Ironside   
6 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Utter bollox mate and you know it, there was ONE squadron of Polish who fought in the last few weeks of the Battle of Britain.

Polish pilots represented of 10% of the total filers employed. On 15th of September they accounted for 14% of German losses, on 19th - 25% and on 26th 48%.

"Had it not been for the magnificent material contributed by Polish squadrons and their unsuppressed gallantry, I hesitate to say that the outcome of the battle have been the same" - Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh Dowding.

I'm sure that you are in better position to judge - not.

*Your * pilots were an undisaplined liability more than anything else untill well into 1941.

Polish pilots were very disciplined, most of them have been career officers of Polish Armed Forces, they were highly motivated and had experience of combat with the enemy. Treating them as recruits didn't inspire they trust in British officers after all many of them experienced the same imperial attitude and pricksh arrogance in France just to see that country going down in only six weeks not that much better than Poland. Given that Poland was devoured by the Germans and Soviets together and France faced only Germany, had a year to prepare, and the fact that geography and borders were much more favorable to France.

But, I suppose it is rather pointless trying to convince histories perpetual losers of anything once they get on their self pitying/self congratulating hobby horse is it,so, in that spirit

I guess it easy to be a "victor" living on an island in the middle of nowhere - would you like to share border with Superpower - Soviets. I just wonder how long would you last - not really but.

Stop whinnying will you? I don't care one way or the other but i think it is a pity that there are some people out there who do know something about history just to be so bloody stupid about it. The facts are there and denying them do not make you bigger but makes you less, like a petty little haggler.

Be like that if you want but do not start with the imperial attitude in the next sentence that just comical.

Of course it was only some Pole responsible for the entire Bletchley Park

No but the key role of Polish cryptologists should be recognized.That the way to do it properly, not to grab all the glory for themselves like insecure lying little sissy.

t was a regiment of Poles who won the war in italy...

War not, but the battle which all others people mentioned by you couldn't win. It inflicted have losses on Polish soldiers whose homeland had been handed to Soviet and at the point in time Polish high command was well aware of the fact. From the malpractice point of view it didn't make sense for them to continue fight against Germany.

That tragedy and dilemma and all what was involved is completely lost on you.

If Poles and Poland were so god dammed tough and invicable why the FK didnt you go and invade the soviet union yourself and liberate your own fking country?

That is a silly qestion - one I'm sure you wish to retract. It just illustrates that you understand nothing from history save some bunch of disconnected facts and dates.

Abilities, skills and fighting spirit of Polish officers and soldiers and their contribution to the victory cannot be diminished by the fact that Poland economy after 19 years of independence and without benefits of long term exploitations of colonies wasn't able to support armaments needed to win against Soviets and Germans combined.
Ironside   
4 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Could you give any reliable link where it is stated that Hitler provided Poland any posibility to join him (on favorable conditions)?

Not everything you can find on the internet and in any case I cannot be bother to look for that specific piece of information. However there were definitively long history of diplomatic negotiation between Hitler and Beck. Also Hitler wanted Poland in his camp as primarily he wanted to attack Soviets.

If Poland had joined with the nazis then the RAF would have flattened Warsaw for the invading Russians instead of Dresden.

You are way off course!
When would that happened? after or before Soviets would have been conquered?Would you attack Germany then?Really?

Poland could have done better against Germany and Russia especially after the War, after-all they were offered the Marshall Plan, but refused.

That is nonsense and rubbish.

Poland doesn't have a history of good governance.

Well, it is debatetable, depends what period you are talking about but given the fact that you constantly exposes your ignorance as to facts about Poland I can sadly say that you are wrong.

Anyway gov of the IIRP was actually very good.
Ironside   
25 Apr 2013
UK, Ireland / London is Poland's 24th largest city [85]

Chicago bills itself as the largest Polish city outside of Poland with approximately 1,100,000 people of Polish ethnicity in the Chicago metropolitan area
Ironside   
11 Apr 2013
Genealogy / Mongolian the Golden Horde - do Poles have Mongolian ancestry? [256]

Not all Poles have Tatar extraction.

Most don't. Regardless it being bad or good. Pure fact.

But, they did routinely attack areas. They almost made it to Austria at one point, even. Though my history on that maybe fuzzy.

They made it few time to strike deeply into territory of Poland and Hungary. It was in 13th and 14th after that the only Tatars attacking Polish Territory (now part of Ukrainian) came from their settlement on Crimea and those attacks were nothing more than rides to rob or steal people to sell them on Ottoman Empire slave markets. So if there were DNA admixture it was on the Ottoman Turkish and Tatar population not the other way around or seldom.

They almost made it to Austria at one point, even. Though my history on that maybe fuzzy.

You are talking about Ottoman empire and 1686. They didn't have to cross Polish territory to make it into Austria. You need to read a couple of books more and do not forget geography.