Ironside
24 Sep 2016
News / Abortion still under control in Poland [2986]
Why mother? In the Roman times it was father that could decide about fate of his children.
Seriously, do you think it is right to kill someone right off the bat just because you can? Just to save your self some grief later?
Because if she would kill her own child it would not affect her at all! She just shrug it off just like that!
Nobody forces mother to rare her child or to care for it. If she is not up for a task, she can give it up for adoption or whatnot! You're full of drama! :)
Some reverse psychology here, redundant. Killing children that cannot even defend themselves is wrong. Period.
No, killing children is wrong. Once you decide that you have right to kill someone because you can and it is convenient to you when does it stop? Next you know it could be you in that redundant human waste category that can be and should be easy discarded.
No, it is moral and human. You propose something that is clearly a backwoods backlash to the philosophy best emphasised by The Tarpeian Rock!
That the key word here. That what it all about! That case has been used to bring forgather laws that would grant people an abortion if requested.
Highly likely? Meaning, maybe maybe not.
That is your opinion.
That is not an argument, but a logical fallacy! Crimes are still being committed regardless of the laws. Should we abolish laws as they clearly do not prevent criminals from committing crimes?
My views have nothing against an aborcion if mother's life is in danger. The point is they didn't know that because they didn't take her complain seriously, saving money and all that.
Irrelevant!
so the mother can decide what is in the best interests of her unborn child.
Why mother? In the Roman times it was father that could decide about fate of his children.
Seriously, do you think it is right to kill someone right off the bat just because you can? Just to save your self some grief later?
this is something that will affect her for the rest of her life.
Because if she would kill her own child it would not affect her at all! She just shrug it off just like that!
with no regard given to the mother at all.
Nobody forces mother to rare her child or to care for it. If she is not up for a task, she can give it up for adoption or whatnot! You're full of drama! :)
painting women that do so as callous and evil is plain wrong.
Some reverse psychology here, redundant. Killing children that cannot even defend themselves is wrong. Period.
But I think if a mother decides after hearing that grim truth, not to have that child, that should be her right.
No, killing children is wrong. Once you decide that you have right to kill someone because you can and it is convenient to you when does it stop? Next you know it could be you in that redundant human waste category that can be and should be easy discarded.
To be forced to go through with it against their wishes though, is nothing short of barbaric.
No, it is moral and human. You propose something that is clearly a backwoods backlash to the philosophy best emphasised by The Tarpeian Rock!
requested.
That the key word here. That what it all about! That case has been used to bring forgather laws that would grant people an abortion if requested.
Ireland's leading obstetricians
Highly likely? Meaning, maybe maybe not.
I think there is
That is your opinion.
All to no avail. Women will still undergo abortions
That is not an argument, but a logical fallacy! Crimes are still being committed regardless of the laws. Should we abolish laws as they clearly do not prevent criminals from committing crimes?
Maybe that statement didn't suit your pro-life views?
My views have nothing against an aborcion if mother's life is in danger. The point is they didn't know that because they didn't take her complain seriously, saving money and all that.
Would you advocate
Irrelevant!
