Nobel Prize and Oscars = Propaganda?

Hey, moron, that photo depicted a protest in Iran and the discussion was about protests in Iran and your comment was posted directly after my comment (and without any mention of the US), so learn to make comments that make sense and are on topic and relevant to the discussion.

Also, I doubt that even in case of US "majority of demostrators are women". I'm guessing that it depends on the situation. For example, look at this photo here:

apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-race-and-ethnicity-elections-dc8f6803f90f844177f324d374242cb6


Indeed.

Hey, stupid, I see broads like this everywhere in the US so your point is pointless.

@Novichok, those are not "broads", you stupid a$$hole. Unless your wife, daughters and granddaughters are "broads" too - then I'll make sure to call them like that from now on :)


In what way is it "pointless"? You bemoan the fact that people in the US don't have it in them to stand up to the government and make street protests or even riots about policies they don't like and then you... sh1t on women for protesting against killing a woman for not wearing her headscarf "properly"? Wtf is wrong with you?

By definition...A screaming woman is a stupid broad. If she sits down and has a conversation she is a woman we can reason with.

@Novichok, so what is a screaming man? You realise that men scream, yell and chant slogans during demonstrations too, right? They even break and burn things and throw stuff at the police.


There's no such "definition". It's all in your head, psycho.

Nothing.

Nobody killed a woman for not wearing a scarf properly. The bi*tch was argumentative, resistsing police orders and arrest.

We have this kind of shlt daily except that it's black thugs, not women. When a thug goes for the cop's gun and gets killed it's reported as:

Cop Murders a Boy for a Missing Sticker.

Don't call her a "bi*tch", you disgusting, lying piece of sh1t. She wasn't resistsing the police orders or arrest and got beaten up when she was already in the police van as witnessed by her co-detainees.


She wasn't a f*cking thug and she wasn't going for anyone's gun, you moron.


Everything is wrong with you.

Hey, stupid, cops don't beat one but not the other who - oh by the way - is a witness.

Why did they pick her? Because she said: Ooops, sorry, I didn't know the dress code or because she gave them a mouthful?

You give a mouthful all the time. You are actually one of the most annoying, screetching posters- can we do the same with you?

Well, let him be happy and for once he will be on top. He is the most annoying (for lack of Strzelec).

You don't say what is too much according to you.

Showing a bit of skin doesn't "bring harassment or worse". Harassers "or worse" do that of their own volition.

That will change into an argument of cause and effect. I don't want that.
I hope you recognize there is more than one factor at play in those social interactions. I like to lessen the odds of them going the wrong path by having certain and clear criteria - appropriate attire in public, behavior, and attitude. There will always be some oddballs and criminals acting out, but I think that would work for most people.

It's people who harass etc that are "going the wrong path".


What does that mean?

Because I don't like you.

I never mouth off to cops. That kind of stupidity belongs to the low intelligence people like blacks and women.

Exactlyl

The dead broad went to Iran to "show them". They didn't beat up her buddy. Only her.

you missing my point, it is rarely a one-way street, there is often more than one factor at play.
---

Well, it could mean many things. It would depend on the context. I don't pretend it is a solution that would work everywhere.

What isn't?

If some people can't control their urges if they see a bit of skin, the fault is theirs alone.

See, cause and effect. I said I don't want to discus that.

The cause is solely men who are so weak they can't control their behaviour.

I disagree, although it might be true about some men, there are more factors than men. Modern society blames everything on men, it is not right. To have responsibilities one needs to have the right to shoulder responsibilities, if you have only responsibilities and not rights it has a name - slavery.

What are those factors though?


Rape and harassment of women are far from being solely modern.

That's why women should not be allowed to vote unless they served in the army and pay taxes.

Currently, in the US, they play tennis and watch Real Housewives all day long and vote for warmongers every four years.

Consequences? What's that? Can't you see I am busy shopping for my next bag and plastic surgeon?

Novi, I noticed you love playing a parasite in this forum. You never start a thread on your own and you always join the discussion only when sb else posts in a thread and it appears on the main page.

Why?????

In fact, he is a saprophyte, he loves carrion.

Nobel Prize and Oscars = Propaganda?

As with "studies"...If it's STEM, it's real...maybe...

If it's because some azhole is black (see Obongo), it's bullshlt for sure...

Novi dear, it's mostly Americans, dear little simpletons that they are, who are taken in by the nonsense of the Oscars.

Hey, stupid, you know damn well that I referred to Nobel Prize.

Nice try, azhole...Obongo never received an Oscar...

women acting recklessly, vices, greed, bad people - men/women being bad, etc.

----

Rape and harassment of women is hardly the only issue, it is just a narrow point of view or even worse a leftie talking point.

...especially when pulled over for speeding while drunk...They will argue with the cops for 15 minutes before they are forcibly removed and cuffed. Then they open up from both barrels, with six fvcks in every sentence ... if you can call their incoherent bs sentences...Many end up in a body wrap and spit mask... Men are seldom that stupid...

Yes, they reach for firearms immediately.

Stop talking dirty.