The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Home / News  % width posts: 74

Simon Mol is dead:No regrets


southern 75 | 7,096
28 Oct 2008 #1
Did these women deserve it or did they fall for their naivety?

Simon Mol, the Cameroonian charged with intentionally infecting several Polish women with HIV, died in a hospital, Saturday night.

ShelleyS 14 | 2,893
28 Oct 2008 #2
No one deserves what he did to them, neither do the men that these women may have unwillingly infected
Kilkline 1 | 689
28 Oct 2008 #3
Good point. Chances are that these girls werent exactly shy with their favours so who knows how many they've passed it onto, and so on.

One AIDS infected phoney asylum seeker = alot of dead Poles.
Harry
28 Oct 2008 #4
Do try and remember that he died an innocent man.
OP southern 75 | 7,096
28 Oct 2008 #5
that he died an innocent man.

An innocent man?
ShelleyS 14 | 2,893
28 Oct 2008 #6
Harry

I understand your point, but this guy knowingly infected god knows how many women and in turn they have infected other people, he was not convicted but the fact still remain that he knowingly engaged in unprotected sex with these girls whilst knowing full well he had HIV / AIDS which tantamounts to murder in my book.

Chances are that these girls werent exactly shy with their favours so who knows how many they've passed it onto, and so on.

I dont want to turn this into a war of the sexes but if these girls were a bit loose, what about the kind of guys that they slept with? I dont think the fact that they slept with him really says anything about their morals or what kind of girls they were and it's unfair to call them on that. What has happened is a terrible for anyone involved who may have HIV.
Kilkline 1 | 689
28 Oct 2008 #7
I dont want to turn this into a war of the sexes but if these girls were a bit loose, what about the kind of guys that they slept with? I dont think the fact that they slept with him really says anything about their morals or what kind of girls they were and it's unfair to call them on that. What has happened is a terrible for anyone involved who may have HIV.

I'm not saying that they got their just deserts or anything stupid like that. However I suspect that women who sleep with African asylum seekers that they've just met are not exactly paragons of chastity and its probably not unreasonable to deduce from this that he probably wasnt the first or last guy they had a one night stand with. Therefore the true number of infected is greater than if these girls hadnt been shagging around. Same goes for the guys that these girls in turn shagged, and so on.

I may get shot down for this but when it comes to sex it isnt the same rules for men and women. A woman can get pregnant and therefore should have more care with who she sleeps with. If a man could get pregnant I suspect he'd be less inclined to chase anything with tits and a pulse. We can manipulate societies rules but nature has its own.
miranda
28 Oct 2008 #8
I may get shot down for this but when it comes to sex it isnt the same rules for men and women. A woman can get pregnant and therefore should have more care with who she sleeps with.

different rules appear to have something to do with morality not with getting pregnant. It is OK for a men to have a number of partners and being perceived as a stud but if a woman sleeps around she is a w......, so I am not shooting you down for this yet, men can impregnate women. In fact, a woman cannot get pregnant by herself and men should be as concerned about pregnancy as women.
ShelleyS 14 | 2,893
28 Oct 2008 #9
I may get shot down for this but when it comes to sex it isnt the same rules for men and women. A woman can get pregnant and therefore should have more care with who she sleeps with. If a man could get pregnant I suspect he'd be less inclined to chase anything with tits and a pulse. We can manipulate societies rules but nature has its own.

Men are just as irrisponsible and personally I dont think pregnancy is on the mind of some thirsty dog and what do they care if a women gets pregnant - it's easy to say adios - in the case of these guys who slept with the girls that are infected they can't say adios to AIDS! I believe that both sexes have a responsibility to take care of themselves especially in this day and age.

However I suspect that women who sleep with African asylum seekers that they've just met are not exactly paragons of chastity

The word "exotic" gets banded about on the forum, I expect some Polish women have a different take on African asylum seekers than what the majority of British women have.

different rules appear to have something to do with morality not with getting pregnant. It is OK for a men to have a number of partners and being perceived as a stud but if a woman sleeps around she is a w......, so I am not shooting you down for this yet, men can impregnate women. In fact, woman cannot get pregnant by herself.

Bingo!

I'm not saying that they got their just deserts or anything stupid like that

I know you weren't.

This is not completely related to this topic but has a connection, a friend of mine who is Slovakian has lived here in the UK for years and her husband is English, her younger brother came over to work here a couple of years ago and said he wouldn't date a British girl because we have all AIDS! I think people from certain countries think that it's not their country's problem and they are almost imune to it.
Kilkline 1 | 689
28 Oct 2008 #10
different rules appear to have something to do with morality not with getting pregnant. It is OK for a men to have a number of partners and being perceived as a stud but if a woman sleeps around she is a w......,

Morality and the consequences of sex are not unrelated, in fact one is a consequence of the other. Human morality is a set of rules and guidelines that spring from what we are as humans, what we need to function as a society. These rules serve a purpose, maybe an updated purpose in some instances, but still.

Women who sleep around will be judged harsher for this than men as it shows shes playing fast and loose with her body in a way a man cant. A man has sex and thats it. A women has sex and the consequences can be much, much more severe.

Wishing this wasnt the case wont make it so.

men should be as concerned about pregnancy as women.

A person should be concerned when their actions have consequences for other people. However when that other person is practically a stranger then your concern for them isnt going to be anything like your concern for yourself. You cant rely on a stranger to not get you pregnant.
BubbaWoo 33 | 3,510
28 Oct 2008 #11
what do they care if a women gets pregnant

isnt that the point...?
ShelleyS 14 | 2,893
28 Oct 2008 #12
Yes - I got carried away, please forgive me almighty Mr B :)
BubbaWoo 33 | 3,510
28 Oct 2008 #13
you are forgiven, as always :)
Patrycja19 63 | 2,699
28 Oct 2008 #14
A woman can get pregnant and therefore should have more care with who she sleeps with.

same applys to men, because they are the fertilizer as thus nature intended ... but forgot to put a automatic stop button on the fertilizer so that he wont go around getting females pregnant.. but thats what the cold shower is for now.

men can impregnate women. In fact, a woman cannot get pregnant by herself and men should be as concerned about pregnancy as women.

Amen!!

If a man could get pregnant I suspect he'd be less inclined to chase anything with tits and a pulse. We can manipulate societies rules but nature has its own.

if we all had one wish, it would be for nature to let men have babies the way we do , none of you would last one minute in the stirrups..

as for manipulating societys rules, I think they have found a way to manipulate nature with technology ..
ShelleyS 14 | 2,893
28 Oct 2008 #15
I think they have found a way to manipulate nature with technology ..

To a certain degree, but this has made promiscuity rife - women have the pill so does that make it okay for them to sh*g about?
IronsE11 2 | 442
28 Oct 2008 #16
wouldn't date a British girl because we have all AIDS

I knew a polish guy who said exactly the same thing to me. I found it quite bizarre!!

but thats what the cold shower is for now.

There are slightly more pleasurable alternatives...
Kilkline 1 | 689
28 Oct 2008 #17
same applys to men, because they are the fertilizer as thus nature intended ... but forgot to put a automatic stop button on the fertilizer so that he wont go around getting females pregnant.. but thats what the cold shower is for now.

Do you sleep around Patrycja? If not why not? Is it just because society tells you not to or because yopu know its not a wise thing for you to do?

if we all had one wish, it would be for nature to let men have babies the way we do

If this was the case then we would need to change our behaviour and morality to reflect this. I cant say thats a day I'm particularly looking forward to though. :)
Patrycja19 63 | 2,699
28 Oct 2008 #18
women have the pill so does that make it okay for them to sh*g about?

nope, i dont agree with the pill. and dont agree with women sleeping around, its unsafe, I agree with that, but it equally goes for the men, thats what I am pointing out and that miranda has pointed out, the blame keeps shifting to the women so convieniently..

I think theres a misconception with the pill and condoms,, its for a person to prevent pregnancy, ( one partener) but some dont care of consequences ( apparently) and maybe dont have the resources to get protection.. even though its not a prevention for disease. but education isnt enough.. so what is the solution to a ongoing epidemic?

Do you sleep around Patrycja?

do u??

If not why not?

because I am married, society doesnt tell me shyt..

or because yopu know its not a wise thing for you to do?

because I was educated and taught morals.. this isnt the case for some and maybe is <~you can get education, but what you take from it is up to you as a person!!

If this was the case then we would need to change our behaviour and morality to reflect this. I cant say thats a day I'm particularly looking forward to though. :)

I would have loved to see my husbands face if he was the one to go into labor and me wipe his forhead from a armslength distance!!

its ok hon, everything will be ok, OUCH thats my arm,, oh god , oh god she has my head in a vicelock.. DOCTOR~~~
OP southern 75 | 7,096
28 Oct 2008 #19
women have the pill

The pill does not protect from STDs.
miranda
28 Oct 2008 #20
Morality and the consequences of sex are not unrelated, in fact one is a consequence of the other

agree but one of the ancient reason for not wanting women be be pregnant with another men was linked to property law. If a men was married and had to support a child of another men, then he was dividing his property in the future to a child of another men. Also, women who had children with other men became demonized as w......., so they would stop getting pregnant with other men and dilute the property.

Morality was a cover up for property protection:).

Far fetched but probably true.
Lodz_The_Boat 32 | 1,535
28 Oct 2008 #21
I say both Mr. Simon and his so called 'naive' victims got what they deserved. You go ahead sleeping around without any morality or respect what so ever!... and expect to receive the delights of this and the after life... its ridiculous!

And those guyz who got bitten by this 'naive' victims!... Well they should've been more hygene then that!

HIV spreads through most immoral, unhygene and abusive means... includes all kinds of pathetic things.

Ofcourse... there are accidents aswell... and my heart goes out for those people! And the cure should also be invented solely for the sake of those innocent people.

These polish or non-polish people who got infected...are all the sons of the same immoral eliment.

Mean?.... but then... the fact.

Morality was a cover up for property protection:).

Whatever it was... it was and is and will always be there. Actually I think all else was a coverup for morality. The intellect of ancient man was not as rich as todays man. Tommorow is always better than today!... more illumined...more wise... as we understand the more important thing....we leave the cover ups behind...and move forward with the real thing...MORALITY.
jonni 16 | 2,485
28 Oct 2008 #22
Harry:
that he died an innocent man.

An innocent man?

Yes. He wasn't convicted of anything in any court, therefore innocent until proven guilty and we will probably never know the truth.

One issue in this whole sorry matter that has been ignored by the media is that he was looking obviously ill for a long time, many people (including me who was a slight acquaintance rather than a friend) knew he had HIV (he was more or less open about this) and that at least some of the Polish women who had sex with him were fully aware that he was HIV positive and that they probably would be infected by unprotected sex.

Strange people indeed.
Wroclaw 44 | 5,386
28 Oct 2008 #24
I say both Mr. Simon and his so called 'naive' victims got what they deserved. You go ahead sleeping around without any morality or respect what so ever!... and expect to receive the delights of this and the after life... its ridiculous!

You have no idea as to the relationship between those women and Mr Mol at the time they were sleeping together.

In fact, you, like the rest of us, are speculating. But where you and I differ is that I don't think these women deserve what they got. However stupid they may have been.

And saving yourself until marriage doesn't necessarily save you from HIV, if your partner already has it.
polishcanuck 7 | 462
28 Oct 2008 #25
Did these women deserve it or did they fall for their naivety?

They're just stupid.
ShelleyS 14 | 2,893
29 Oct 2008 #26
The pill does not protect from STDs.

That's my point - but it has promoted promiscuity amongst women.

I say both Mr. Simon and his so called 'naive' victims got what they deserved.

Im not feeling the love in the room after that comment - very ignorant and unpleasant.

HIV spreads through most immoral, unhygene and abusive means... includes all kinds of pathetic things.

Really? How about my friends uncle who WAS a hemaphiliac? you are a stupid little fuckwit.

and that at least some of the Polish women who had sex with him were fully aware that he was HIV positive and that they probably would be infected by unprotected sex.

I find it hard to believe that any woman would have unprotected sex with a man who is open about his AIDS unless they were unware of what HIV / AIDS was and that is even more unbelievable!.
Kilkline 1 | 689
29 Oct 2008 #27
And those guyz who got bitten by this 'naive' victims!... Well they should've been more hygene then that!

HIV spreads through most immoral, unhygene and abusive means... includes all kinds of pathetic things.

Your ignorance is laughable. You sound like a third world medicine man. Maybe if the victims had slept with a virgin and showered afterwards that would have cured them.
jonni 16 | 2,485
29 Oct 2008 #28
jonni:
and that at least some of the Polish women who had sex with him were fully aware that he was HIV positive and that they probably would be infected by unprotected sex.

I find it hard to believe that any woman would have unprotected sex with a man who is open about his AIDS unless they were unware of what HIV / AIDS was and that is even more unbelievable!.

The social circle he moved within comprised a lot of very self-destructive and damaged individuals, most with enduring mental health issues. He chose his victims carefully.
ShelleyS 14 | 2,893
29 Oct 2008 #29
Are you being sarcastic?

Yes. He wasn't convicted of anything in any court, therefore innocent until proven guilty and we will probably never know the truth.

jonni 16 | 2,485
29 Oct 2008 #30
Unfortunately not.

There are some very disturbed people in this world, no different here in Poland. Simon Mol spent a lot of time with a particular radical (even extreme) organisation, from which most of the women came. Most were students or recent students, all were involved in radical politics, some (and I know a few of those people but tend to avoid them) are very damaged individuals.

Home / News / Simon Mol is dead:No regrets
Discussion is closed.