The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Home / News  % width   posts: 63

Saab A26 submarines for Poland


Torq  26 | 2095
26 Nov 2025   #1
Poland is buying three Saab A26 stealth submarines...



... as best suitable for action in the Baltic Sea.

I have only one question: can multi-warhead nuclear missiles be fired from these subs?
Novichok  7 | 11482
26 Nov 2025   #2
... as best suitable for action in the Baltic Sea.

I see that Poles are on the way to commit suicide.

So go ahead and get those coffins ... but first remove the DC from your speed dial, fvcking idiots.

A question for fvcking idiots: How does Switzerland survive without nukes and subs?
Ironside  53 | 13904
26 Nov 2025   #3
Poland is buying

Poland should prioritize its military spending. We can't afford to overlook that. We are not a sea power; what we need is land power.

Additionally, I doubt those subs can have nuclear weapons, but that at least would make sense if we could have submarines with nuclear capabilities.
OP Torq  26 | 2095
26 Nov 2025   #4
remove the DC from your speed dial

You must surely remember my repeated advice to Americans concerning what they should do from Europe:

F _ CK _FF

Would you like to buy a vowel?

if we could have submarines with nuclear capabilities

Plus, they are stealth submarines. So they can strike from any unknown place with multiple warheads. Stationary nukes on land can be destroyed by a pre-emptive strike. If we put them on subs, there's nothing our enemies can do to prevent us from firing them when such need arises.
OP Torq  26 | 2095
26 Nov 2025   #5
How does Switzerland survive without nukes and subs?

Very strong military, mass territorial defense, and no border with Russia make surviving ever so easier.

Also, they are landlocked, Ryszard, so they have no use for submarines. :)
Ironside  53 | 13904
26 Nov 2025   #6
Ryszard, so they have no use for submarines. :)

He means Yellow Submarine.
Novichok  7 | 11482
26 Nov 2025   #7
So they can strike from any unknown place with multiple warheads

...only to witness Warsaw become flatter than an Ikea parking lot at midnight. Great plan...

I have a question...Poland has 40 million people. What percentage is total and irreparable morons?

Hey, Bobko, you owe me one for asking this question, so you don't have to.
OP Torq  26 | 2095
26 Nov 2025   #8
Great plan...

It is a great plan indeed: if our enemies know that they cannot destroy Poland without suffering nuclear annihilation of epic proportions themselves, they will never dare to attack us. That's the whole point of having nuclear weapons.

What percentage is total and irreparable morons?

The more important question is: what percentage are cowards? And the answer is: negligible. Therefore, galactic c*nts who harbor fantasies of attacking Poland should reconsider their brilliant plans.
Alien  29 | 7637
26 Nov 2025   #9
How does Switzerland survive without nukes and subs

They have banks.
Novichok  7 | 11482
26 Nov 2025   #10
if our enemies know that they cannot destroy Poland

Who is your enemy?

What made them your enemy?
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #11
Who is your enemy?

Criminal putinist regime.

What made them your enemy?

They made themselves our enemies by reverting to 19th century imperial politics and threatening us (repeatedly) with war and nuclear weapons.
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #12
Criminal putinist regime.

That enemy liberated Poland in 1945. In 1994, it ordered 300,000 of its troops out of Poland and didn't object to Poland joining NATO.

Now let me tell you who the real enemy of Poland is....Morons like you.
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #13
Almost forgot...That enemy protected Poland from the "freedom and democracy" spreading American warmongers, busily killing Koreans and Vietnamese who didn't like the idea...
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #14
That enemy liberated Poland in 1945.

Did I say Russia/Soviet Union?

No, I said "criminal putinist regime". They did none of the things you write about.

Morons like you.

Don't push it, Ryszard, or I will reconsider my latest policy of being nice to you.
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #15
Did I say Russia/Soviet Union?

You, Russian hating azzholes, can't have both ways...

Either the Soviet Union then and Russia today are two separate countries or the same "evil".

I noticed that Russia haters choose one or the other depending on what fits better...
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #16
Russian hating azzhoiles

Who are you talking to? I am the greatest Russophile in pomorskie vojvodship.

two separate countries or the same "evil"

Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore but there is a legal continuity between the SU and the Russian Federation. What's your point (assuming boldly that there is any)?
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #17
Who are you talking to? I am the greatest Russophile in pomorskie vojvodship.

There are at least three kinds of "you"...Individual, editorial, and plural that is applicable to a specific group....

If I meant you individually, I would say, you, Torq,...In this case, I meant Russia-hating morons like Milo, jon, and cymes . This clearly excludes you, Torq.

How did you decide to use Torq, not Torque? Are you into cars?
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #18
What's your point (assuming boldly that there

My point is fairness and equality.

Poland is friendly with Germany. Good.

Poland has 1000 more reasons to be friendly with Russia, but it it's not. In fact, the relations with Germany and Russia are in reverse...Disgusting...

If you ever will need nukes, based on history, they should be against Germans, not Russians. Which, of course, would be totally ridiculous.

My best advice for Poles: STFU, forget your stupid nuke dreams, enjoy the US umbrella, and say thank you, Novi and other US taxpayers, for paying for it.
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #19
You, Russian hating azzholes

Well, you said it in reply to my post, so I wanted to make sure you didn't mean me.

How did you decide to use Torq

It's from Tomás de Torquemada - great son of the Church and a man of profound religious conviction.

be friendly with Russia

Oh, we would be absolutely delighted to be friendly with them if it wasn't for the fact that they are currently conducting a hybrid warfare against Poland and regularly threaten us with much more than a hybrid war.

Russia is ruled by people for whom the fall of the Soviet Union was the greatest trauma in life. Now they seek revenge and return to their imperial past. Their choice.
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #20
they are currently conducting a hybrid warfare against Poland

...but not against a dozen other Euro countries...including Austria and Switzeland.

Why is that? Maybe because you are siding with their enemy who is currently occupying Russia and killing Russisans?

How about staying out of this war and minding your own damn business...

Again...before you say something really stupid...look up Kosovo, Crimea, and self-determination referendum...

I noticed that Russia haters hate the word "referendum" more than they hate Russia itself. No, I will never stop referring to "referendum" and "Kosovo"...
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #21
who is currently occupying Russia and killing Russisans?

It wasn't Ukraine who invaded Russia but the other way around.

How about staying out of this war and minding your own damn business...

What happens to Ukraine is our business since we were given to understand that "we will be next".

I am of the opinion that if Russia conducts another act of sabotage against Poland, we should go to war against them. Actually, we should go to war against them right now, without delay - we can either fight now, while Ukraine is still defending, or we will be figthing alone (with limited aid from our European allies) later.

It breaks my Russophile heart but putinist criminals are leaving us no other option. However, even as we go to war we should make it abundantly clear: Russian nation is not our enemy, our enemy is quasi-fascist, neo-imperial putinist regime.
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #22
It wasn't Ukraine that invaded Russia, but the other way around.

The Russian soldiers are in Russia trying to liberate Russia from Western proxies.

It is the Ukrainian soldiers who are illegally occupying Russia. They have three choices: GTFO, surrender, or die.

What would you advise them?

Memo to the Russian army: Kill as many as you can to prevent any future attempt to reoccupy Russian land.
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #23
The Russian soldiers are in Russia trying to liberate Russia from Western proxies.

Hm... it is difficult to say whether you really swallow all that propaganda like a young pelican swallows fish or you are just so afraid that you cowardice speaks through you.

What would you advise them?

Keep defending your country, because if Russia goes further, there will be more Buchas and more Mariupols. Keep fighting for your fatherland.

Memo to the Russian army: Kill as many as you can

Oh, the occupiers are trying to do that just. However, the heroic defenders are inflicting high losses on the invaders.
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #24
Hm... it is difficult

No, it's not. Name the land where the Russian army is outside Russia and killing the other guys.

Keep defending your country,

Their country is not under attack. Russia is.

Kosovo, Crimea, referendum...Duh...
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #25
Name the land where the Russian army is outside Russia

Ukraine.

Their country is not under attack. Russia is.

Hm... perhaps you are genuinely retarded after all.

Oh, well.
Novichok  7 | 11482
27 Nov 2025   #26
However, the heroic defenders are inflicting high losses on the invaders.

So did the German army at Stalingrad.

Do you want me to remind you how it ended?

Long live Russia. Death to those who want to drag the US into a war that is not ours to fight.


  • flag.jpg
OP Torq  26 | 2095
27 Nov 2025   #27
So did the German army at Stalingrad.

No. At Stalingrad Germans were the invaders and Russians defended their land. You should sue your history teacher - he did an atrocious job.
Alien  29 | 7637
27 Nov 2025   #28
So did the German army at Stalingrad

The Germans surrendered at Stalingrad.
Korvinus  9 | 855
27 Nov 2025   #29
Long live Russia.

Have you heard what people are saying about your old lady in town?
Novichok  7 | 11482
28 Nov 2025   #30
No. At Stalingrad, the Germans were the invaders and the Russians defended their land.

In this war, Ukrainians are the invaders and Russians defend their land.

Don't believe me? Try to visit Mariupol and see whose visa you will need - Ukrainian or Russian...

Good answer, Polish boy...Yes, it will be a Russian visa, and that's how it will be for the next 1000 years...hahahahahahahahaha...because the voters voted to separate from U and join R.

Kind of like in Kosovo...This damn Kosovo again...how to weasel out of this one...


Home / News / Saab A26 submarines for Poland

Please login to post here!