Poland & Nuclear Weapons for Defense - Opinions

Will Poland really be getting nuclear weapons or is it all hype ?
The song and dance changed once reality set in.
"In the event US nuclear weapons appear on Polish soil, the relevant facilities will immediately be added to the list of legitimate targets to be hit in the scenario of a direct military confrontation with NATO," Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said late last month.

Poland now seems to be split on the issue.

msn.com/en-us/news/world/poland-conflicted-on-nuclear-weapons/

I suppose there are already other strategic Polish targets on Russian lists. So, nothing new. A few more targets doesn`t matter. With Jesus King of Poland protection shield we can sneeze at those empty threats.


Yes, rightist President Duda is hurraoptimistically for while Mr Honourable Prime Holy Minister Donald Reverend Tusk is doubtful. Not against - just doubtful.

Russia attacked lots of neutral countries. Lots of its own allies in the unique alliance to only attack its own members. Yet they attacked ZERO nato members.

So far. NATO cancer is spreading without knowing where the Russian red line is. Trust me, there is a red line.
The US had its red line during the Cuban crisis. Russia is entitled to have its own.

russia's only legitimate red line is its 2013 borders.

if russia stays in its own lane then it will be fine.

No part of the soviet union that wasn't russia in 2013 is russia's business....

The US's only legitimate red line was its border in 1962 off the coast of Florida. The US extended its red line into the Atlantic Ocean far from Florida.

Russia can extend its red line to a location of its choice.


No part of the US that wasn't Cuba...

history, idiot, learn it..... cold war "we will bury you".... and the US was a superpower in a completely different league from the third rate dirt empire of russia....

the US was and is simply superior to cccp/ russia in every possible way.

different rules for class A superpowers and class C (at best) wannabe superpowers...

Your idiotic post does not make mine wrong in any way.

If fact, you moved the discussion from right and wrong to the cynicism of who has a bigger gun.

I am OK with and I appreciate the change.

Russia, go and kill them all. You can apologize later - if you give a fvck.

Thanks, maf.

It's difficult to understand what you're saying when you tremble so hard. Putin is too shitscared to even touch Latvia and Estonia which are under NATO protective umbrella. If not for the likes of Merkel, Ukraine could have also enjoyed this umbrella and Russia could only seethe about it.

Fortunately NATO!!!!!!!!

They wanna nuke the US far more than anywhere in Europe, which you'd know if you paid any attention to real russian media (as opposed to the censored garbage put out on RT)

500,000 Ukrainians are dead because of NATO. Good job NATO...

Dear NATO me toos: What's stopping you, stinking cowards, from putting on U uniforms and chasing Russia out?

Z can give you instant citizenship to keep things clean and from getting out of hand...


Let me guess...You lost the link...Bad boy...

the stupid and the lazy are two dim to do their own research but fortunately there are kind souls who are ready to help them...

twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1785154775618658507

I'd love it if the NATO leaders have the balls.

We should not be afraid of Russia's red lines. Russia should be afraid of NATO's.

The red line for Russia is always the next possible escalation step... until it happens and the red line is moved to the one after that.

Do you really believe that there are no American and British troops already in Ukraine?


Agreed 100%.

There aren`t. If you claim there are, it is Russian propaganda which you happily spread. Shame on you!

Of course, I believe that there are Americans and Brits in Ukraine and I wish them a quick death as new Ukraine citizens before this war becomes WW3.

Their numbers, however, are insufficient to move the needle.

The US and the UK should send 500,000 men each and finish off what Z clearly can't.


This sentence of yours reveals the insanity of NATO as a suicide pact.

Imagine you are Biden. Russia attacks Estonia.

What do you do?

Get an ice-cream cone and hope there is a little girl at the ice-cream shop to sniff.
Then call Putin and threaten to send killer drones and a $50 billion aid package to Estonia to defend themselves.
Then take his meds and a nap.

I join Poland and Finland that are already there, defending Estonia.

I would ask over breakfast where Estonia actually is?

Why would Poland go nuclear? To sate magnates of the USA and the Vatican?

Why Serbia need Kosovo? Serbvs moved out a long time ago. Voted with their feet.

Its not the same situation to be taken as example. As for Kosovo and Serbs, we didn`t move. We resisted. Some Serbs were expelled or as it is popular to say were ethnically cleansed, some escaped, what comes to be the same as ethnic cleansing, some were killed and some local Serbs still stood. While Albanians (Shiftars), that were fist against Serbs, were sponsored to populate Kosovo. Sponsored by the Turks, AH, Vatican, Italy, France, Germany.

So, what Poland goes nuclear for the sake of foreigners, have with Kosovo Serbian question and our resistance to foreigners. To same those foreigners that would profit if Poland goes nuclear. Tell me.

For our sake. To make absolutely sure that we are never again invaded by Russia.

Nukes are for foreigners to know their place and not have any bright ideas.
---


It is, if Serbia had nukes they wouldn't take Kosovo away from you, Now it was as easy as taking a candy away from a child. Hell, you are still crying about it.

---


You have been told and enlightened some thank you is in order.