European News and Poland Thread - part 4

hey ryszard don't be like that, all of us know you're polish.

Quoting:

If someone travels through a safe country and doesn't apply for asylum there, they may not be eligible to apply in a subsequent country.

It means nothing.


Really? Opinion is irrelevant since the stats are fficial and unbiased.


Most of them aren't illegal (that guff about safe countries has no legal force) however they have disrespected our visa and entry requirements and should never be allowed to settle.

Anyway, most are from middle class backgrounds and are conservative religious people so they can fùck off home.


They all had. A small number were acquitted however the evidence against the Nazi War Criminals was indisputable.

Again, no, because countries which are signatories of the 1951 convention cannot "impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees" (that bit is so short I'm allowed to quote it).

is no longer fit for purpose.... it needs to be scrapped, it serve no useful purpose anymore

That's something which we could discuss. What is indisputable, however, is that it is now in force and needs to be obeyed until/unless it is reformed.

I think what's going to happen is that countries will simply start ignoring it since in the current context it's absolutely against the national interest of too many countries.

Deportation is not a penalty.

Penalties: fine, prison, flogging, death. "Get the fvck out" is not a penalty. It's a form of self-defense.

Without it, a country like Denmark can be striffled to death by a million refugees.

No, mass deportation is a crime. This does not apply to the deportation of individuals for criminal offenses.

Is mass immigration illegal?

Nothing is a crime until the USC makes it a crime.

He just pulls shlt out of his ass because it feels good...I got to try it one of these days...

It usually isn't, at least the mass emigration of Poles to the West over the years was not illegal, at least from the Western point of view. For Poland, however, it was often illegal but rather not sanctioned. Otherwise, the "Germans" would not come to visit their family in Poland.

It's amazing how quiet the PF Euros are about the riots and mayhem in England. Yet these are the same people who are always the first to criticize our borders.

Did you know you can get arrested in the UK just for critizing their immigration policy.

Its Orwells 1984 over there. Ill stay right here in the good old USA where we still have freedom of speech.

• 
  526897154_7711275387.jpg
  

It's Orwellian and so sad to watch an otherwise sane country die by a million cuits...I really mean it. It's really sad...

The problem is that it's impossible for them to admit that they have been wrong all these years...Their feeling of moral superiority would be poof gone in one minute...

Memo to Euros:

Learn the difference between testicles and balls as well as being civil and a suicidal moron...

Which Nazi Germany's law had they broken?
--

lol! You mean the laws of other countries that they imposed on Germany? On what ground?Lex retro non agit - this rule is one of the basic rules of any system of law.

Germany can't even do that!

How is the current model of letting anyone and everyone into the country and never making them leave going?

How is it sustainable?

The whole "sanctuary" system was thought out and made into law by our german founding fathers with the horrors of the last war still freshly in mind....with the making of a safe space for political refugees fighting dictatorships, and to give the wandering masses after the forced re-ordering of european borders after '45 quickly a new home.

It was never meant to invite the masses from the whole planet, from far away places and incompatible cultures/religions....that was NEVER meant with that!

Germany needs to go back to the roots of this law, quickly....or it will be thrown into the bin of history!