European News and Poland Thread - part 4

hey ryszard don't be like that, all of us know you're polish.

Quoting:

If someone travels through a safe country and doesn't apply for asylum there, they may not be eligible to apply in a subsequent country.

It means nothing.


Really? Opinion is irrelevant since the stats are fficial and unbiased.


Most of them aren't illegal (that guff about safe countries has no legal force) however they have disrespected our visa and entry requirements and should never be allowed to settle.

Anyway, most are from middle class backgrounds and are conservative religious people so they can fùck off home.


They all had. A small number were acquitted however the evidence against the Nazi War Criminals was indisputable.

Again, no, because countries which are signatories of the 1951 convention cannot "impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees" (that bit is so short I'm allowed to quote it).

is no longer fit for purpose.... it needs to be scrapped, it serve no useful purpose anymore

That's something which we could discuss. What is indisputable, however, is that it is now in force and needs to be obeyed until/unless it is reformed.

I think what's going to happen is that countries will simply start ignoring it since in the current context it's absolutely against the national interest of too many countries.

Deportation is not a penalty.

Penalties: fine, prison, flogging, death. "Get the fvck out" is not a penalty. It's a form of self-defense.

Without it, a country like Denmark can be striffled to death by a million refugees.

No, mass deportation is a crime. This does not apply to the deportation of individuals for criminal offenses.